What DNA vaccine are being developed?

17 March 2025
Introduction to DNA Vaccines

Definition and Mechanism
DNA vaccines are defined as plasmid DNA constructs carrying genetic information that encodes one or more antigenic proteins of interest. Once administered, they work by entering host cells—either by passive uptake or via assisted delivery techniques such as electroporation—and subsequently reaching the nucleus where they are transcribed into messenger RNA. The produced mRNA is then translated into antigenic proteins that are processed and presented by antigen‐presenting cells (APCs). This process results in the induction of both humoral (antibody‐mediated) and cellular (T cell–mediated) immune responses. In this way, DNA vaccines attempt to mimic natural infections. They bypass some of the limitations associated with conventional vaccine platforms, such as the risks intrinsic to live‐attenuated or inactivated vaccines, while offering the benefits of rapid production, stability over a broad temperature range, and the flexibility to encode diverse antigens.

Historical Development and Milestones
The concept of DNA vaccination has been around since the early 1990s when Wolff et al. initially demonstrated that direct injection of plasmid DNA could result in protein expression in animal models. Over time, basic research breakthroughs—ranging from the refinement of plasmid backbones to advances in delivery methods (such as electroporation or lipid-based nanoparticle formulation)—have allowed significant translation from bench to preclinical models and even to human clinical trials. Milestones include the demonstration of protective immunity in small animal models, the first clinical trials combining DNA vaccination with viral vector boosts to overcome immune tolerance, and the approval of several DNA vaccines for veterinary use (for instance, against West Nile virus or infectious hematopoietic necrosis). As our understanding of gene-based immunization advanced, both the intellectual property landscape—illustrated by a series of patents—and regulatory pathways have evolved, setting the stage for candidate vaccines targeting infectious diseases and cancer.

Current DNA Vaccines in Development

Vaccines Targeting Infectious Diseases
A number of DNA vaccines are being designed to combat emerging infectious diseases and pandemics. Several candidates are in various phases of preclinical and clinical development. For example, during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, DNA vaccines such as Inovio’s INO-4800 have entered clinical evaluation. This candidate is constructed as a plasmid that expresses the full-length spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 and is delivered via electroporation to enhance cellular uptake and antigen expression. Early animal studies with INO-4800 demonstrated the generation of both neutralizing antibodies and a robust T cell response. Additional clinical trials for infectious disease targets—such as DNA vaccines against influenza, Ebola, and Zika virus—are underway and rely on rapid manufacturing cycles and the ease of sequence modification of these plasmid constructs.

Beyond SARS-CoV-2, investigators are also exploring DNA vaccines against other viral pathogens that cause emerging infections. The promise lies in the speed at which design modifications can be implemented following the identification of genetic sequences from an emerging pathogen. Furthermore, some DNA vaccine strategies include multivalent constructs that encode multiple antigens to broaden the immune response, potentially increasing their cross-protective efficacy. It is well recognized that while many animal models have shown efficacy, the challenge remains to translate these immunogenic responses to humans effectively.

Vaccines for Cancer and Other Diseases
DNA vaccine development is not solely confined to infectious diseases. A major area of research is the development of cancer vaccines. These vaccines typically encode tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) or neoantigens that are overexpressed or uniquely mutated in tumor cells. The goal is to train the immune system to recognize and eradicate cancer cells. For example, several candidates targeting cancers such as melanoma, prostate cancer, and cervical cancer have been advanced into preclinical studies and early clinical trials.

Various strategies have been explored to enhance the efficacy of cancer DNA vaccines. One approach involves engineering the DNA plasmids not only to encode the tumor antigen but also to include genetic adjuvants such as cytokines (IL-12, GM-CSF, IL-2) that can stimulate the immune response. Some innovative patents describe vaccine compositions designed to elicit more robust antitumor immunity. Furthermore, personalized vaccine strategies have emerged in which the unique neoantigens derived from a patient’s tumor are encoded in the DNA vaccine. This personalized approach shows promise in harnessing the specificity of the immune system to target individual cancers more effectively.

In addition to targeting solid tumors, DNA vaccines are also being explored for other chronic infections and diseases with an immune component. For instance, early research indicated potential in using plasmid DNA vaccines for HIV by encoding multiple viral proteins—often rendered safe by inactivating the enzyme functions of reverse transcriptase, integrase, and accessory proteins like Vif. Similar vaccine strategies are also being considered for other pathogens, and patents exemplify the ongoing work in designing constructs based on large genomic fragments to broaden antigen representation against both human and animal pathogens.

Development Process and Challenges

Preclinical and Clinical Trial Stages
The development pipeline for DNA vaccines generally follows the classical progression from preclinical studies to multiple phases of clinical evaluation. In preclinical models, DNA vaccines have demonstrated proof-of-concept by showing effective antigen expression, the induction of immune responses, and protection in various challenge studies, particularly in small animals. However, transitioning from animal models to human clinical trials has been challenging due to differences in the immune systems of species.

Clinical trial designs for DNA vaccines are rigorous. They typically begin with phase I studies focusing on safety and immunogenicity in small cohorts, then proceed to phase II for dose optimization, and finally, phase III trials are conducted on larger populations to confirm both efficacy and safety. The majority of DNA vaccine clinical trials conducted so far have shown that these vaccines are exceedingly safe, with few adverse effects. However, the immunogenicity – particularly the magnitude and durability of the cellular and humoral response – often remains suboptimal when compared with traditional vaccine platforms, especially in larger animals and humans.

Many of these clinical studies are designed with combination strategies, such as prime-boost regimens where a DNA vaccine prime is followed by a boosting agent (for example, a viral vector or a protein immunogen) to overcome the inherent low transfection efficiencies and enhance overall immune responses. Additionally, the scale-up production for DNA vaccine manufacturing includes attention to producing high-quality, supercoiled DNA with minimal contaminants—a subject of in-depth research and quality by design (QbD) processes.

Technical and Regulatory Challenges
Despite theoretical advantages, several significant technical challenges hinder the clinical translation of DNA vaccines. One primary issue is the low efficiency of DNA uptake by target cells and the subsequent low level of protein expression. Because the DNA must reach the nucleus to be transcribed, the cellular barriers (including endosomal entrapment and nuclear envelope transport) restrict high-level antigen production. To overcome these hurdles, researchers have developed various delivery platforms such as electroporation devices, cationic lipids, and polymeric or nanoparticle carriers to improve uptake and intracellular trafficking.

Another problem is the need to significantly boost the immunogenicity obtained with naked DNA injections. Although the safety profile is excellent, DNA vaccines often require potent adjuvant strategies or combinatorial delivery systems to stimulate the immune system sufficiently. New approaches include co-administration of molecular adjuvants encoded on the same or a co-delivered plasmid, optimization of the plasmid sequence (i.e., codon optimization, removal of bacterial sequences), and integration of nuclear localization signals.

From a regulatory perspective, DNA vaccines face certain uncertainties. Although several DNA vaccines have been licensed for veterinary use, no DNA vaccines for humans have yet reached full licensure. Regulatory agencies require a high level of evidence to allay concerns about potential integration of plasmid DNA into the host genome, autoimmunity from anti-DNA antibody production, and the long-term expression effects in vivo. Ongoing revisions to regulatory guidelines, such as those by the WHO for the quality, safety, and efficacy of DNA vaccines, reflect these challenges and the necessity to streamline and accelerate review pathways in the event of public health emergencies such as emerging infectious diseases.

Manufacturing challenges also remain a focal point. The scalability of plasmid DNA production requires adherence to good manufacturing practices (GMP) and careful process characterization to ensure that the final product meets critical quality attributes, such as a high percentage of supercoiled DNA and minimal contamination with host cell proteins or endotoxins. Moreover, the cost per dose, despite being lower than many conventional vaccines, is still impacted by the need to optimize formulations for stability and delivery efficiency.

Impact and Future Prospects

Potential Benefits and Efficacy
The potential benefits of DNA vaccines are many. First, their design allows for rapid development upon obtaining the genetic sequence of a pathogen, which is crucial during outbreaks. DNA is a chemically stable molecule, enabling the vaccines to be stored with less stringent cold chain requirements, thus making distribution easier and reducing costs. In addition, the flexibility of the platform allows for multiplexing—encoding several antigens or immunomodulatory factors on one plasmid—which can lead to robust and balanced immune responses.

Another significant advantage of DNA vaccines is safety. Because these vaccines do not contain live pathogens, there is no risk of reversion to virulence. Furthermore, the ability to deactivate any replicative functions or oncogenic sequences during plasmid design enhances their safety profile. Although potential concerns exist—such as sporadic integration into the host genome and the induction of anti-DNA antibodies—ample studies have suggested that these risks are minimal, particularly when DNA vaccines are designed with safety modifications.

In terms of efficacy, while early clinical trials have sometimes shown only modest immune responses in humans compared to animal models, ongoing improvements with delivery methods, adjuvant co-formulation, and prime-boost strategies are closing that gap. For instance, enhanced delivery by electroporation, combined with codon optimization and inclusion of molecular adjuvants, have led to improved immunogenicity, as observed with candidates like INO-4800 for COVID-19 and various cancer DNA vaccines. The responsiveness of the immune system to these enhanced vaccines could lead to a future where DNA vaccines not only prevent diseases but also serve as therapeutic agents against cancer and other chronic conditions.

Future Trends and Research Directions
Looking toward the future, several key research directions are likely to shape the evolution of DNA vaccines. First, there is an ongoing need to further refine delivery methods. Advances in nanotechnology and biomaterials could yield next-generation delivery systems—such as biodegradable nanoparticles or lipid-polymer hybrids—that improve cellular uptake efficiency and protect the DNA from degradation in vivo. Approaches that integrate methods like electroporation with novel carrier formulations are expected to further boost transfection efficiency and, hence, immunogenicity.

Another trend is the refinement of plasmid design using synthetic biology tools. By removing unnecessary bacterial sequences (thus achieving minicircle DNA or MIDGE constructs) and integrating potent regulatory elements (for example, strong promoters and optimized polyadenylation signals), investigators can increase antigen production and tailor the immune response more specifically. The expansion of personalized DNA vaccines is another promising area. In oncology, advances in high-throughput genomics allow for the identification of patient-specific neoantigens that can be encoded into a DNA vaccine, potentially leading to highly personalized immunotherapeutic regimens.

From the regulatory and manufacturing standpoint, standardizing production processes through quality by design (QbD) approaches will be critical. Process characterization studies, such as those utilizing definitive screening design to optimize fermentation and plasmid purification, will help ensure reproducible high-quality DNA vaccines at scale. Moreover, evolving regulatory guidelines—for instance, the updated WHO guidelines addressing quality, safety, and nonclinical evaluation—aim to harmonize the approval process worldwide and thereby accelerate market entry in future public health emergencies.

Finally, the concept of combinatorial vaccine approaches is becoming increasingly important. DNA vaccines may be combined with other vaccine modalities such as mRNA or viral vectors to achieve synergistic effects. In the cancer field, combination therapies that integrate DNA vaccines with immune checkpoint inhibitors show promise in overcoming the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and eliciting a more robust antitumor response. Similarly, for infectious diseases, prime-boost strategies leveraging both DNA and protein-based vaccines could optimize immunogenicity and durability of protection.

Conclusion
In summary, a large array of DNA vaccine candidates is currently under development for both infectious diseases and cancer treatment. On one hand, for emerging infectious diseases such as SARS-CoV-2 and beyond, DNA vaccine candidates like INO-4800 demonstrate rapid design, ease of manufacturing, and robust safety profiles, even though challenges concerning immunogenicity persist. On the other hand, cancer DNA vaccines are being engineered to express tumor-associated antigens and are further augmented with molecular adjuvants to enhance T cell and humoral responses. These candidates are in various preclinical and early clinical stages, with several patents supporting innovative approaches in vaccine design.

The development process—from preclinical proof-of-concept to clinical safety and efficacy testing—remains a rigorous and iterative journey. Technological challenges, such as efficient DNA uptake, intracellular trafficking, and ensuring sustained high-level antigen expression, continue to be addressed through improved delivery methods (such as electroporation and nanoparticle carriers) as well as through optimized plasmid engineering (via codon optimization and minimization of bacterial sequences). Concurrently, regulatory agencies are fine-tuning guidelines to expedite the review and licensure process without compromising safety.

Looking ahead, the potential benefits of DNA vaccines are substantial. They offer rapid adaptability, stability, safety, and low manufacturing costs when compared to other vaccine platforms. Future research will likely focus on combining DNA vaccines with innovative delivery systems, leveraging personalized medicine approaches—especially in oncology—and integrating these vaccines with other immunotherapies to overcome the challenges of low immunogenicity and immune tolerance. If these hurdles are overcome, DNA vaccines could revolutionize both prophylactic and therapeutic vaccinations in humans, providing effective and timely responses to both endemic and emerging health threats.

In conclusion, the promising advances in DNA vaccine technologies indicate that they are currently being developed to target a wide range of diseases—from viral infections such as COVID-19 to various cancers and chronic infections like HIV. These developments, supported by extensive preclinical research, phased clinical trials, and detailed regulatory planning, point to a future where DNA vaccines could become an integral part of the global immunization strategy. With continued innovations in vector design, delivery methodologies, and combinatorial therapeutic approaches, DNA vaccines are poised to leave a lasting impact on public health and personalized medicine.

For an experience with the large-scale biopharmaceutical model Hiro-LS, please click here for a quick and free trial of its features

图形用户界面, 图示

描述已自动生成