Delving into the Latest Updates on GR-79236 with Synapse

Overview

Basic Info

Drug Type

Small molecule drug

Synonyms

GR 79236

Target

A1R

Mechanism

A1R agonists(Adenosine A1 receptor agonists)

Therapeutic Areas

Endocrinology and Metabolic DiseaseNervous System DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases+ [1]

Active Indication-

Inactive Indication

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2HyperlipidemiasPain+ [1]

Originator Organization

GSK Plc

Active Organization-

Inactive Organization

GSK Plc

Drug Highest PhaseDiscontinuedPhase 2

First Approval Date-

Regulation-

Login to view timeline

Structure

Molecular FormulaC15H21N5O5

InChIKeyGYWXTRVEUURNEW-TVDBPQCTSA-N

CAS Registry124555-18-6

Intense efforts of many pharmaceutical companies and academicians in the A(1) adenosine receptor (AR) field have led to the discovery of clinical candidates that are antagonists, agonists, and allosteric enhancers. The A(1)AR antagonists currently in clinical development are KW3902, BG9928, and SLV320. All three have high affinity for the human (h) A(1)AR subtype (hA(1) K (i) < 10 nM), > 200-fold selectivity over the hA(2A) subtype, and demonstrate renal protective effects in multiple animal models of disease and pharmacologic effects in human subjects. In the A(1)AR agonist area, clinical candidates have been discovered for the following conditions: atrial arrhythmias (tecadenoson, selodenoson and PJ-875); Type II diabetes and insulin sensitizing agents (GR79236, ARA, RPR-749, and CVT-3619); and angina (BAY 68-4986). The challenges associated with the development of any A(1)AR agonist are to obtain tissue-specific effects but avoid off-target tissue side effects and A(1)AR desensitization leading to tachyphylaxis. For the IV antiarrhythmic agents that act as ventricular rate control agents, a selective response can be accomplished by careful IV dosing paradigms. The treatment of type II diabetes using A(1)AR agonists in the clinic has met with limited success due to cardiovascular side effects and a well-defined desensitization of full agonists in human trials (GR79236, ARA, and RPR 749). However, new partial A(1)AR agonists are in development, including CVT-3619 hA(1) AR K(i) = 55nM, hA(2A:hA2B:hA(3))1,000:20, CV Therapeutics), which have the potential to provide enhanced insulin sensitivity without cardiovascular side effects and tachyphylaxis. The nonnucleosidic A(1)AR agonist BAY 68-4986 (capadenoson) represents a novel approach to angina wherein both animal studies and early human studies are promising. T-62 is an A(1)AR allosteric enhancer that is currently being evaluated in clinical trials as a potential treatment for neuropathic pain. The challenges associated with developing A(1)AR antagonists, agonists, or allosteric enhancers for therapeutic intervention are now well defined in humans. Significant progress has been made in identifying A(1)AR antagonists for the treatment of edema associated with congestive heart failure (CHF), A(1)AR agonists for the treatment of atrial arrhythmias, type II diabetes and angina, and A(1)AR allosteric enhancers for the treatment of neuropathic pain.

01 Dec 2008·Expert opinion on investigational drugsQ2 · MEDICINE

A₁adenosine receptor agonists and their potential therapeutic applications

Q2 · MEDICINE

Review

Author: Elzein, Elfatih ; Zablocki, Jeff

BACKGROUND:

The challenges in developing any A(1) adenosine receptor (A(1)-AdoR) agonist involve having the desired effect on target tissue while avoiding side effects due to activation of A(1)-AdoR on other tissues. A(1)-AdoR de-sensitization leading to tachyphylaxis is also another challenge.

OBJECTIVES:

The major goal of this review is twofold: to highlight the structure affinity relationships (SAR) of A(1)-AdoR agonists, starting with initial lead compounds that were the genesis for second-generation compounds with high selectivity, affinity, and partial agonism; and to give an overview of the A(1)-AdoR agonists under development for various indications.

RESULTS:

Intense efforts by many pharmaceutical companies and academicians in the A(1)-AdoR agonist field have led to the discovery of clinical candidates for the following conditions: atrial arrhythmias - Tecadenoson, Selodenoson and PJ-875; type 2 diabetes (T2D) and insulin-sensitizing agents - GR79236, ARA, and CVT-3619; pain management - SDZ WAG 994, GW493838; and angina - BAY-68-4986. For the i.v. antiarrhythmic agents that act as ventricular rate control agents, a selective response can be accomplished by careful dosing paradigms. The treatment of T2D using A(1)-AdoR agonists has been met by limited success due to cardiovascular side effects and well-defined desensitization of full agonists in both animal models and human trials (GR79236 and ARA). However, new partial A(1)-AdoR agonists are in development, including CVT-3619 (hA(1)-AdoR K(i) = 55 nm, selectivity A(2A) > 200; A(2B) > 1000; A(3) > 20, CV Therapeutics), that have the potential to provide enhanced insulin sensitivity without cardiovascular side effects or tachyphylaxis. The A(1)-AdoR agonists GW493838 and GR792363 are under evaluation for pain management. The non-nucleosidic A(1)-AdoR agonist, BAY-68-4986 (Capadenoson), represents a unique approach to angina wherein both animal studies and early human studies are promising.

CONCLUSION:

The challenges associated with developing an A(1)-AdoR agonist for therapeutic intervention are now well defined in humans. Significant progress has been made in identifying agents for the treatment of atrial arrhythmias, T2D, and angina.

01 Apr 2007·British journal of anaesthesiaQ1 · MEDICINE

Multicentre evaluation of the adenosine agonist GR79236X in patients with dental pain after third molar extraction

Q1 · MEDICINE

Article

Author: D.J. Rowbotham ; L.G. Allan ; J.A. Langton ; J.E. Peacock ; J.R. Sneyd

BACKGROUND:

Adenosine is analgesic in humans, and the selective adenosine A1 receptor agonist GR79236X has significant anti-nociceptive activity in an animal pain model of inflammatory pain.

METHODS:

Seventy-nine patients with moderate pain after third molar extraction under general anaesthesia were randomized to receive a 15 min double-blind infusion containing either GR79236X 4 microg kg-1, GR79236X 10 microg kg-1, diclofenac 50 mg, or saline placebo. Rescue analgesia was promptly available to all patients.

RESULTS:

Meaningful pain relief (mild or no pain) was attained by 9 (47%) patients in the placebo group, 12 (63%) patients in the GR79236 4 microg kg-1 group, 10 (48%) patients in the 10 microg kg-1 group, and 16 (80%) patients in the diclofenac 50 mg group. Neither dose of GR79236 produced a significant improvement over placebo, but diclofenac was superior to both placebo (P=0.036) and GR79236 10 microg kg-1 (P=0.034). Median times to rescue or additional analgesia were 62, 100, 60, and 363 min for patients receiving placebo, GR79236 4 microg kg-1, 10 microg kg-1, and diclofenac 50 mg, respectively (diclofenac significantly longer than placebo, P=0.002 log-rank test). Pain control was poor in the placebo group and in both GR79236 groups, with between 79 and 86% of patients having good pain control (i.e. mild or no pain) for <20% of the time compared with only 30% of patients who received diclofenac.

CONCLUSION:

We found no evidence of efficacy of GR79236 compared with placebo, but the active control diclofenac was effective. It is possible that a higher dose of GR79236 might have been effective or that i.v. administration of this drug does not achieve appropriate concentrations in the brain or peripheral nerves.

100 Deals associated with GR-79236

Login to view more data