Background:
Right bundle branch block is an established predictor for new conduction disturbances and need for a permanent pacemaker (
PPM
) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. The aim of the study was to evaluate the absolute rates of transcatheter aortic valve replacement related
PPM
implantations in patients with pre‐existent right bundle branch block and categorize for different transcatheter heart valves.
Methods and Results:
We pooled data on 306 transcatheter aortic valve replacement patients from 4 high‐volume centers in Europe and selected those with right bundle branch block at baseline without a previously implanted
PPM
. Logistic regression was used to evaluate whether
PPM
rate differed among transcatheter heart valves after adjustment for confounders. Mean age was 83±7 years and 63% were male. Median Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 6.3 (interquartile range, 4.1–10.2). The following transcatheter valve designs were used: Medtronic CoreValve (n=130; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN); Edwards Sapien
XT
(
ES
‐
XT
; n=124) and Edwards Sapien 3 (
ES
‐3; n=32; Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA); and Boston Scientific Lotus (n=20; Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA). Overall permanent pacemaker implantation rate post‐transcatheter aortic valve replacement was 41%, and per valve design: 75% with Lotus, 46% with CoreValve, 32% with
ES
‐
XT
, and 34% with
ES
‐3. The indication for
PPM
implantation was total atrioventricular block in 98% of the cases. Lotus was associated with a higher
PPM
rate than all other valves.
PPM
rate did not differ between
ES
‐
XT
and
ES
‐3. Ventricular paced rhythm at 30‐day and 1‐year follow‐up was present in 81% at 89%, respectively.
Conclusions:
Right bundle branch block at baseline is associated with a high incidence of
PPM
implantation for all transcatheter heart valves.
PPM
rate was highest for Lotus and lowest for
ES
‐
XT
and
ES
‐3. Pacemaker dependency remained high during follow‐up.