L-697661

Synergistic inhibition of HIV replication in cell culture has been reported for many combinations of reverse transcriptase inhibitors. However, the biochemical basis underlying this interaction is in most cases unknown. It has been previously shown that combinations of L-697,661 or U-90152s with AZT or ddC synergistically inhibit HIV-1 replication in cell culture. The combination of AZT with ddC is also favorable with respect to the inhibition of viral replication. However, the corresponding combinations showed no synergy in inhibiting enzyme activity when tested on conventional polymerase assays using homo- or heteropolymeric RNA and DNA as template. Data obtained suggest that amplification of the effect of chain terminators, a consequence of the high potential number of termination sites present on the template, override the synergistic effect expected for the combination of two independent nucleotide analogs. When a saturating amount of enzyme over template:primer was used, and a single site on the template was available for each chain terminator, the combination of AZTTP and ddCTP synergistically inhibited enzyme activity, whereas, as expected, the combination of AZTTP and ddTTP behaved as merely additive. Under similar conditions the combination of U-90152s and AZTTP was also synergistic. These results suggest that synergy found in antiviral assays with combinations having nucleosidic inhibitors is not related to the synergistic inhibition of reverse transcriptase and might be due to the presence in the viral population of virus strains with different sensitivity to the inhibitors.

To decrease viraemia levels in primary HIV infection by using a combination of zidovudine (ZDV) and L-697,661.

Four primary HIV-infected patients were treated for 6 months with ZDV, 250 mg twice daily, in association with the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor L-697,661 500 mg three times daily. Viraemia, proviral DNA, CD4 and CD8 cell counts were measured serially during 18 months.

Viraemia decreased to undetectable levels (< 200 RNA copies/ml) in two patients. A third patient had a marked decrease followed by a rebound during therapy; viraemia levels did not vary markedly in the fourth patient. A rebound in viraemia levels was observed within 15 days of discontinuation of therapy in the three responding patients. Proviral levels evolved in parallel with viraemia but were always detectable in all patients. In the three patients with an initial decrease of viraemia, CD4 cell counts were within the normal range 2 months after initiation of therapy and did not markedly decrease after discontinuation of therapy. In the two patients with partial or no response of viraemia, mutations associated with low level of resistance to L-697,661 appeared during treatment.

A marked decrease of viraemia can be achieved in some primary HIV-infected patients with combined therapy. Six months of treatment does not prevent a rebound of viraemia, which was observed within 15 days of interruption of therapy.