Elopiprazole

In silico screening was performed to search for binary solids in which a phenylpiperazine-derivative drug was cocrystallized with a dicarboxylic acid. The phenylpiperazine derivative could be any of 61 such drugs, while the dicarboxylic acid could be any of nine such acids. The uniqueness of this approach was that two criteria had to be fulfilled simultaneously, namely a high propensity for cocrystallization and a sufficient solubility advantage. Using the mixing enthalpies of selected pairs of crystal formers with high affinities for one another permitted the classification of candidates with a high probability of cocrystallization. Further modeling of the solubility advantage allowed the identification of many binary solids that potentially exhibit significantly enhanced solubility in water. Based on the computed values for the mixing enthalpies and solubility advantage factors, it was concluded that dicarboxylic acids are both excellent coformers for cocrystallization with phenylpiperazines and very good solubility enhancers; indeed, the use of dicarboxylic acids as coformers would allow the degree of dissolution to be tuned for many of the studied drugs. The observed similarities of the cocrystallization landscapes of the studied drugs and excipients were also explored.

Medicinal chemists have traditionally realized assessments of chemical diversity and subsequent compound acquisition, although a recent study suggests that experts are usually inconsistent in reviewing large data sets. To analyze the scaffold diversity of commercially available screening collections, we have developed a general workflow aimed at (1) identifying druglike compounds, (2) clustering them by maximum common substructures (scaffolds), (3) measuring the scaffold diversity encoded by each screening collection independently of its size, and finally (4) merging all common substructures in a nonredundant scaffold library that can easily be browsed by structural and topological queries. Starting from 2.4 million compounds out of 12 commercial sources, four categories of libraries could be identified: large- and medium-sized combinatorial libraries (low scaffold diversity), diverse libraries (medium diversity, medium size), and highly diverse libraries (high diversity, low size). The chemical space covered by the scaffold library can be searched to prioritize scaffold-focused libraries.