Recainam

The pharmacokinetics, antiarrhythmic activity and safety of intravenously administered recainam were evaluated in 15 men and 3 women. All patients had frequent (> 30/hour) ventricular premature complexes (VPCs) and unsustained ventricular tachycardia. Recainam was administered at a loading dose of 4.5 mg/kg/hour over 40 minutes, followed by a maintenance infusion of 0.9 mg/kg/hour for 23 hours and 20 minutes. Sixteen patients had satisfactory efficacy data. The mean frequency of total VPCs decreased by 92.6% and the mean frequency of runs decreased by 99.9% during the maintenance infusion. Suppressions of > or = 70% of total VPCs and > or = 90% of runs were maintained over the 23-hour, 20-minute maintenance infusion period in 16 of the 18 patients. During the maintenance infusion, hourly group plasma recainam concentrations ranged from mean +/- SD 2.6 +/- 0.7 to 3.4 +/- 0.9 micrograms/ml. Patients were observed for 24 hours after termination of the infusion. Periodic blood samples were obtained during and after termination of the infusion to determine recainam concentration. Urine specimens were collected over scheduled intervals to determine urinary excretion of recainam. A 2-compartment pharmacokinetic model was used to analyze the data. The following pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained: terminal elimination half-life, 5.0 +/- 0.8 hours; systemic clearance, 0.27 +/- 0.08 liter/hour/kg; and central and steady-state volume of distribution, 0.32 +/- 0.11 and 1.4 +/- 0.4 liter/kg, respectively. Adverse experiences were reported in 4 of the 18 patients, possibly drug-related in 2; none was considered severe or required discontinuation of recainam.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The aim was to compare the effects of the class Ic antiarrhythmic drugs flecainide, encainide, and recainam on the delayed rectifier current, IK.

Membrane currents were studied using the single suction pipette voltage clamp technique in freshly dissociated cat ventricular myocytes bathed in HEPES buffered physiological saline at 32 degrees C.

Flecainide and encainide decreased IK with IC50 values of 2.1 microM and 6 microM, respectively. Recainam (100 microM) reduced IK by only 7 (SEM 3)% after 20-30 min exposure and by 19% after an 80 min exposure (IC50 > 400 microM). None of the compounds blocked the inward rectifier, IK1. Block of IK by flecainide and encainide increased with depolarisation following a voltage dependence similar to that describing channel activation. Flecainide and encainide also slowed the time course of the IK tail currents, consistent with drug dissociating from open channels.

The observed voltage dependence for IK block by flecainide and encainide resembles the interaction reported between these agents and the excitatory sodium channel, ie, depolarisation enhances block while repolarisation leads to removal of block. The results further suggest that the electrophysiological profile of class Ic agents can have a markedly different ionic basis, ie, K+ channel block by flecainide and encainide is balanced by a potent block of sodium channels, while recainam appears to be a weak but relatively specific blocker of sodium channels only. These differences are not readily accommodated by the current Harrison-Vaughan-Williams classification scheme, and suggest the possibility that potentially important drug specific differences can exist within the same antiarrhythmic drug class.