Niaoduqing Granules

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various Chinese patent medicines in the treatment of inflammatory response in diabetic nephropathy(DN) based on network Meta-analysis. Randomized controlled trial(RCT) of oral Chinese patent medicines for improving inflammatory response in patients with DN was retrieved from CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMbase, Web of Science, and other databases from database inception to October 2022. All investigators independently screened the literature, extracted data, and evaluated the quality. Stata 16.0 software and RevMan 5.4.1 were used to analyze the data of the literature that met the quality standards. Finally, 53 RCTs were included, involving 6 Chinese patent medicines. The total sample size was 4 891 cases, including 2 449 cases in the test group and 2 442 cases in the control group. The network Meta-analysis showed that(1) in terms of reducing TNF-α, the top 3 optimal interventions according to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve(SUCRA) were Shenshuaining Capsules/Granules/Tablets + conventional western medicine, Jinshuibao Capsules + conventional western medicine, and Niaoduqing Granules + conventional western medicine.(2) In terms of reducing hs-CRP, the top 3 optimal interventions according to SUCRA were Bailing Capsules + conventional western medicine, Tripterygium Glycosides Tablets + conventional western medicine, and Shenshuaining Capsules/Granules/Tablets + conventional western medicine.(3) In terms of reducing IL-6, the top 3 optimal interventions according to SUCRA were Bailing Capsules + conventional western medicine, Tripterygium Glycosides Tablets + conventional western medicine, and Jinshuibao Capsules + conventional western medicine.(4) In terms of reducing UAER, the top 3 optimal interventions according to SUCRA were Shenshuaining Capsules/Granules/Tablets + conventional western medicine, Huangkui Capsules + conventional western medicine, and Jinshuibao Capsules + conventional western medicine.(5) In terms of reducing Scr, the top 3 optimal interventions according to SUCRA were Jinshuibao Capsules + conventional western medicine, Niaoduqing Granules + conventional wes-tern medicine, and Tripterygium Glycosides Tablets + conventional western medicine.(6) In terms of reducing BUN, the first 3 optimal interventions according to SUCRA were Niaoduqing Granules + conventional western medicine, Tripterygium Glycosides Tablets + conventional western medicine, and Huangkui Capsules + conventional western medicine.(7) In terms of improving the clinical total effective rate, the first 3 optimal interventions according to SUCRA were Jinshuibao Capsules + conventional western medicine, Niaoduqing Granu-les + conventional western medicine, and Huangkui Capsules + conventional western medicine. The results showed that the combination of western medicine and Chinese patent medicine could reduce the expression of serum inflammatory factors TNF-α, hs-CRP, and IL-6 and inhibit the inflammatory response. The combination of western medicine and Chinese patent medicine was superior to western medicine alone in reducing Scr, BUN, and UAER, and improving the total effective rate of treatment. Due to the limitation of the quantity and quality of literature included, the above conclusions need to be validated by more high-quality studies.

The therapeutic benefits of Niaoduqing granules (NDQG) in kidney diseases has been comprehensively studied, but its adverse drug reactions remain unexplored.

To evaluate the safety of NDQG in kidney disease treatment.

The literature was searched in Embase, Medline via PubMed, Cochrane Library database, Wanfang database, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, SinoMed, and Chinese VIP Database from inception to January 15, 2022, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. The ClinicalTrials.gov website was searched for ongoing trials. The frequency and characteristics of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were the primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. Subgroup analysis were conducted to explore the effects of clinical trial types, different kidney diseases, drug combinations and dosage on the safety of NDQG.

This review included 132 trials comprising 115 RCTs and 17 cohort studies. Additionally, 118 studies reported ADR rates with complete data, including 10381 participants. Regarding ADR frequency, no significant difference was observed between NDQG (7.26%) and control (8.39%) groups (RR = 0.890, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.788-1.007); with no heterogeneity among the studies (I² = 0.0%, P = 0.958). ADR frequency in patients with chronic kidney disease (65 trials, n = 5823) was significantly lower in the NDQG treatment group than in the control group (RR = 0.810, 95% CI: 0.67-0.969, I² = 0.0%, P = 0.993); however, for patients with diabetic nephropathy there was no difference between both groups (26 trials, n = 2166, RR = 1.077, 95% CI: 0.802-1.446, I² = 0.0%, P = 0.611). Similarly, the incidence of ADR in patients on dialysis and patients with pyelonephritis and nephrotic syndrome was the same for both groups, with 95% CI overlapping the line. For different interventions, including NDQG monotherapy or its combination with other commonly used drugs (including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, statin drugs, and compound α-keto acid) or dialysis, the incidence of ADR showed no significant difference between the experimental and control arms. The ADR in the NDQG group primarily affected the gastrointestinal system (64.74%), central and peripheral nervous system (9.07%), whole body (5.79%), and skin and appendages (4.53%). The most common clinical manifestations were diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting.

Our meta-analysis showed that compared with supportive therapy, the incidence of ADR was similar when NDQG was added. However, current evidence is not definitive and more well-designed and conducted RCTs are warranted to definitively establish the reliable evidence.

PROSPERO CRD 42018104227.