Efegatran sulfate hydrate

Cardiac biomarkers are routinely obtained in the setting of suspected myocardial ischemia and infarction. Evidence suggests these markers may correlate with functional and clinical outcomes, but the strength of this correlation is unclear. The relationship between enzyme measures of myocardial necrosis and left ventricular performance and adverse clinical outcomes were explored.

Creatine kinase (CK) and CK-MB data were analyzed, as were left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by angiogram, and infarct size by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging in patients in 2 trials: Prompt Reperfusion In Myocardial-infarction Evolution (PRIME), and Efegatran and Streptokinase to Canalize Arteries Like Accelerated Tissue plasminogen activator (ESCALAT). Both trials evaluated efegatran combined with thrombolysis for treating acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Peak CK and CK area-under-the-curve (AUC) correlated significantly with SPECT-determined infarct size 5 to 10 days after enrollment. Peak CK had a statistically significant correlation with LVEF, but CK-AUC and LVEF correlation were less robust. Statistically significant correlations exist between SPECT-determined infarct size and peak CK-MB and CK-MB AUC. However, there was no correlation with LVEF for peak CK-MB and CK-MB AUC. The combined outcome of congestive heart failure and death were significantly associated with CK AUC, CK-MB AUC, peak CK, and peak CK-MB measurements.

Peak CK and CK-MB values and AUC calculations have significant correlation with functional outcomes (LVEF- and SPECT-determined infarct size) and death or CHF outcomes in the setting of STEMI. Cardiac biomarkers provide prognostic information and may serve as valid endpoint measurements for phase II clinical trials.

Several of the newly developed anti-Xa and anti-IIa agents have been shown to influence the International Normalized Ratio (INR) values. During phase I trials with normal healthy volunters and phase II study patients who were given warfarin and concomitant anti-IIa or anti-Xa agents, it has been reported that INR values were falsely elevated. It is of critical importance to know of the effects of these agents on INR to avoid dosage errors. To study the influence of these agents on INR, we used several anti-IIa agents (argatroban, recombinant hirudin, efegatran, and PEG-hirudin) and anti-Xa drugs (pentasaccharides such as fondaparinux and idraparinux, DX-9065a and JTV-803). The anti-IIa drugs were supplemented in citrated plasma at a concentration of 0 to 1 μg/mL level and anti-Xa drugs in the range of 0 to 25 μg/mL. The IC50 values for each of these agents were calculated. Four different commercially available prothrombin time (PT) reagents were used to perform the PT assays and to calculate the relative INR values. Direct synthetic factor IIa and Xa inhibitors exhibited a concentration-dependent increase in the INR values. Hirudin, efegatran, and PEG-hirudin showed a weaker effect, whereas argatroban showed a much higher elevation of the INR values. Synthetic indirect anti-Xa agents such as the pentasaccharide did not show any effect on the INR values. Furthermore, prothrombin time reagents with high ISI values exhibited disproportionally higher INR values for both the direct anti-Xa and anti-IIa agents. Elevation of INR values has therapeutic implications when non-oral anticoagulant drugs are used in combination with drugs such as warfarin. Because of the false elevation of INR values with some of the non-oral anticoagulant drugs, patients who are on concomitant warfarin therapy should be carefully evaluated for their corresponding INR values for proper dosing. To avoid dosing errors it is best not to use the INR values in the therapeutic monitoring of anti-Xa and anti-IIa agents either in the monotherapeutic or polytherapeutic modalities. These data also warrant the development clinically relevant methods for the monitoring of the concomitant use of newly developed anti-Xa and anti-IIa drugs with oral anticoagulants.