PCSK9 inhibitors(Hansoh)

The 2019 European Society of Cardiology and European Atherosclerosis Society (2019 ESC/EAS) guidelines stress the importance of managing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) after myocardial infarction (MI) to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events. Information on guideline implementation is limited. The aim of this survey was to describe current clinical practice regarding LDL-C management in the first year post-MI across Europe, improving understanding of the role of ESC/EAS guidelines on clinical practice.

A qualitative web-based cross-sectional physician survey about the patient pathway and LDL-C management post-MI was conducted in 360 physicians from France, Italy, Germany, The Netherlands, Spain, and the UK (n = 60/country) between December 2019 and June 2020. Secondary and primary care physicians (SCPs/PCPs) described their experiences treating patients post-MI over the preceding 2 months.

Physicians reported that on average 90.7% of patients not prescribed lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) before an MI initiated LLT as inpatients; for patients already taking LLT, treatment was intensified for 64.7% of inpatients post-MI. SCPs reported prescribing higher-intensity statins and/or ezetimibe for between 72.3% (Italy) and 88.6% (UK) of patients post-MI. More than 80.0% of SCPs and 51.2% of PCPs stated that they would initiate a change in LLT immediately if patients did not achieve their LDL-C treatment goal by 12 weeks post-MI; 82.0% of SCPs and 55.1% of PCPs reported referring to 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for management of patients post-MI. Barriers to initiating PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9is) included prior prescription of a maximally tolerated dose of statin (49.4%) and/or ezetimibe (38.9%), requirement to reach threshold LDL-C levels (44.9%), and pre-authorization requirements (30.4%).

Differences in clinical practice post-MI were reported across the countries surveyed, including divergence between 2019 ESC/EAS and local guidelines. Increased use of innovative medicines to achieve LDL-C goals should reduce risk of subsequent cardiovascular events in very high-risk patients post-MI.

The efficacy of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibition has broadened lipid-lowering therapy thus providing decreased risk in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Unfortunately, the widespread use of PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9i), ie, monoclonal antibodies, has led to the findings of unusual responsiveness, ie, a phenomenon defined as an LDL-C reduction of <30% vs the average LDL-C reduction efficacy of 50-60%. This unusual responsiveness to PCSK9i is attributable to several factors, ie, lack of adherence, impaired absorption, poor distribution or early elimination as well as abnormal effects of PCSK9i in the presence of anti-antibodies or mutations in PCSK9 and LDLR. Unexpectedly increased lipoprotein (Lp)(a) also appear to contribute to the unusual responsiveness scenario. Identification of these responses and mechanisms underlying them are essential for effective management of LDL-C and cardiovascular risk. In this review, we describe plausible reasons underlying this phenomenon supported by findings of clinical trials. We also elaborate on the need for education and regular follow-up to improve adherence. Collectively, the review provides a summary of the past, present, and future of mechanisms and countermeasures revolving around unusual responses to PCSK9i therapy.