Article
Author: Chew, Kara W ; Li, Jonathan Z ; Javan, Arzhang Cyrus ; Mu, Ying ; Moser, Carlee B ; Smith, Davey M ; Hughes, Michael D ; Ritz, Justin ; Fletcher, Courtney V ; Giganti, Mark J ; Wohl, David A ; Caskey, Marina ; Corado, Katya C ; Daar, Eric S ; Eron, Joseph J ; Neytman, Gene ; Currier, Judith S
Background:Outpatient COVID-19 monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatment via subcutaneous delivery, if effective, overcomes the logistical burdens of intravenous administration.
Methods:ACTIV-2/A5401 was a randomized, masked placebo-controlled platform trial where participants with COVID-19 at low risk for progression were randomized 1:1 to subcutaneously administered BMS-986414 (C135-LS) 200 mg, plus BMS-986413 (C144-LS) 200 mg, (BMS mAbs), or placebo. Coprimary outcomes were time to symptom improvement through 28 days; nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 RNA below the lower limit of quantification (LLoQ) on days 3, 7, or 14; and treatment-emergent grade 3 or higher adverse events (TEAEs) through 28 days.
Results:A total of 211 participants (105 BMS mAbs and 106 placebo) initiated study product. Time to symptom improvement favored the active therapy but was not significant (median 8 vs 10 days, P=0.19). There was no significant difference in the proportion with SARS-CoV-2 RNA
Conclusions:While safe, the BMS mAbs delivered subcutaneously were not effective at treating COVID-19 at low risk for progression. The lack of clinically significant activity may relate to the pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous administration of mAbs.