Beta-blocker(Selectus)

Beta-blocker prescriptions for patients with anxiety increased substantially between 2003 and 2018, yet there is no clinical guidance concerning their use. A previous review of propranolol - a beta-blocker - in the treatment of anxiety concluded there was insufficient evidence to support its use. Additional data have been published in the eight years since that review including some evidence for other beta-blockers. We aimed to synthesise all available data on the effectiveness of beta-blockers in the treatment of anxiety disorders in adults.

We searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Trial Registries (September 2023), including randomised controlled trials (RCT), non-randomised control group comparative studies and cross-over trials reporting self- or clinician-reported anxiety symptoms. Study quality was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias tool, with meta-analyses conducted by comparator group using random-effects models.

Searches produced 3068 records, with 10 studies included, of which five were included in meta-analyses (n = 179). There was no evidence for a beneficial effect of beta-blockers compared with either placebo or benzodiazepines in patients with social phobia or panic disorder with/without agoraphobia (p-value for all meta-analyses ≥0.54).

Many of the included studies had small sample sizes, missing data and high or unclear risk of bias.

Beta-blockers are increasingly prescribed for anxiety, yet there is a lack of robust evidence of effectiveness. There is a need to understand when and why practitioners are using these drugs, and to undertake a large RCT to provide definitive evidence of whether beta-blockers are an effective and safe treatment for anxiety.

The clinical governance of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has markedly changed in the last few years. We sought to assess the contemporary in-hospital management patterns of patients with AMI at a country level.

EYESHOT (EmploYEd antithrombotic therapies in patients with acute coronary Syndromes HOspitalized in iTalian cardiac care units)-2 was a nationwide, prospective registry aimed to evaluate the current management of patients admitted to intensive cardiac care units (CCUs) for an AMI in Italy.

Over a 4-week period (February 1st-29th, 2024), 183 CCUs enrolled 2806 consecutive patients: 52.6 % with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and 47.4 % with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The median time from hospital admission to angiography in NSTEMI was 22.3 h (IQR 10.9-46.1), while for STEMI was 1.1 h (IQR 0.5-2.2) with significant difference between hospitals with and without catheterization laboratories. In both NSTEMI and STEMI patients, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was the preferred management strategy (73.3 % and 94.2 %, respectively). An optimal secondary prevention therapy, including dual antiplatelet therapy, inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system, a beta-blocker and a high-intensity statin was prescribed at discharge in more than 75 % of patients with AMI. In-hospital major bleedings occurred in 2.0 % and 2.3 % (p = 0.58), while death in 1.8 % and 2.8 % (p = 0.09) of NSTEMI and STEMI patients, respectively.

The EYESHOT-2 registry shows the current management strategies and outcome of AMI patients admitted to Italian CCUs and provides insights to improve the clinical care of such patients.

URL: http://www.

gov. Unique identifier: NCT06316128.