Oxaceprol

The efficacy of several protocols for ovulation synchronization and timed artificial insemination (TAI) in goats was examined. In addition, the relationship between levels of pregnancy specific protein B (PSPB) during gestation assessed with a commercially available ELISA and the number of offspring at birth was determined. In Experiment 1, 70 does were randomized into four treatments: (1) breed by estrus [BBE], (2) 6-d treatment with a new [C6N], (3) once-used [C61], or (4) twice-used Controled Internal Drug Release (CIDR) device [C62)]. BBE does received two 15 mg doses of prostaglandin-F2α (PGF) at a 10-d interval and were bred 12 h after estrus onset. CIDR groups received a CIDR for 6 d with 15 mg PGF given at CIDR removal. TAI was performed 48 h after CIDR removal and does were given 50 μg GnRH. All does were inseminated with a single dose of frozen semen using a non-surgical, transcervical technique. Pregnancy rates for the BBE, C6N, C61 and C62 treatment groups were 39% ± 12%, 64% ± 12%, 77% ± 12% and 57% ± 12%, respectively, and did not differ. Reuse of CIDRs, even with reuse extending for a total of 21 d, was as effective as new CIDRs for synchronization of ovulation. In Experiment 2, 68 does were randomized into four treatments: (1) BBE, (2) C6N, (3) NC.Synch [NCS], (4) modified NCS [NCSM]. The BBE and C6N groups were as described for Experiment 1. The NCS and NCSM groups received 15 mg PGF on Day 1, 50 μg GnRH on Day 8 and 15 mg PGF on Day 15 (NCS) or Day 15.5 (NCSM). Does were bred by TAI at 72 h (NCS) or 60 h (NCSM) after the second PGF injection. All does in the NCS and NCSM groups received 50 μg GnRH at TAI. Pregnancy rates were 53% ± 12%, 30% ± 11%, 50% ± 11% and 41% ± 12% for does in the BBE, C6N, NCS and NCSM group, respectively, and did not differ. In Experiment 3, 62 does pregnant to TAI were bled at Days 48 and 85 post-insemination for PSPB. Data on kid numbers and birth weights were subsequently recorded. At Day 48 of gestation, PSPB levels for does birthing singletons were lower than for does birthing twins or triplets (25.0 ± 0.1^a, 28.8 ± 0.1^b and 30.7 ± 0^b ng/mL, respectively, ^abP<0.05). At Day 85 of gestation, PSPB levels were progressively greater for does birthing singletons versus twins versus triplets (27.0 ± 0.1^a, 28.5 ± 0.1^b and 31.6 ± 0^c ng/mL, ^abcP<0.05). In conclusion, PSPB concentrations detected using a commercially available ELISA at Day 48 or 85 of gestation could distinguish does carrying single versus multiple fetuses.

Oxaceprol, a derivative of l-proline, is an established drug for managing osteoarthritis (OA) with better safety profile than non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). This systematic review and meta-analysis, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, evaluated the efficacy, safety and tolerability of oxaceprol in OA. Electronic databases for published and grey (unpublished) literature were searched to identify parallel-group randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the impact of oxaceprol in patients with OA. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane collaboration's tool. A total of seven parallel-group RCTs involving 1087 participants were included in the systematic review. Meta-analysis, in Review Manager, demonstrated numerically greater/significant improvements compared to active control [diclofenac/ibuprofen]/placebo in pain and function of joint; similar improvement vs. active control in global treatment efficacy; no difference/significant difference vs. active control/placebo in NSAIDs as rescue medication. Treatment with oxaceprol showed numerically less adverse events (AEs) than active control (diclofenac: risk ratio [RR], 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45 to 1.11; p=0.14: ibuprofen: RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.30 to 1.78; p=0.49) and significantly fewer AEs compared to placebo (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.92; p=0.004). Given the nature of small-to-moderate sample size and short duration of eligible studies, the available clinical evidence of oxaceprol in the management of OA is modest - though looks promising. New and better RCTs with larger sample size and longer follow-up are warranted to strengthen the use of oxaceprol in clinical setting for managing OA.