Uracil Mustard

DNA damage response (DDR) during interphase involves active signaling and repair to ensure genomic stability. However, how mitotic cells respond to DNA damage remains poorly understood. Supported by correlative live-/fixed-cell microscopy, it was found that mitotic cells exposed to several cancer chemotherapy compounds acquire and signal DNA damage, regardless of how they interact with DNA. In-depth analysis upon DNA damage during mitosis revealed a spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC)-dependent, but ataxia telangiectasia mutated-independent, mitotic delay. This delay was due to the presence of misaligned chromosomes that ultimately satisfy the SAC and missegregate, leading to micronuclei formation. Mechanistically, it is shown that mitotic DNA damage causes missegregation of polar chromosomes due to the action of arm-ejection forces by chromokinesins. Importantly, with the exception of DNA damage induced by etoposide-a topoisomerase II inhibitor-this outcome was independent of a general effect on kinetochore microtubule stability. Colony formation assays in pan-cancer cell line models revealed that mitotic DNA damage causes distinct cytotoxic effects, depending on the nature and extent of the damage. Overall, these findings unveil and raise awareness that therapeutic DNA damage regimens may contribute to genomic instability through a surprising link with chromokinesin-mediated missegregation of polar chromosomes in cancer cells.

During mitosis and meiosis, centromere proteins (CENPs) play a key role in proper chromosome segregation. Abnormal expression of CENPs leads to chromosome instability, which is the main cause of tumorigenesis.

To elucidate the functional characteristics of CENPs in pan-cancer, we comprehensively analyzed the expression landscape of CENPs and their relationships with patient survival, genomic alterations, tumor immunity, tumor microenvironment, and anticancer drug sensitivity. The expression patterns and signaling pathways of CENPs were identified through multiple bioinformatics mining and experimental verification. GEPIA2 and PrognoScan were implemented to evaluate the prognostic value of CENPs. The molecular functions of CENPs in pan-cancer were comprehensively assessed using cBioPortal, GSCA, ImmuCellAI, CellMiner, the ROC plotter tool and TIDE.

The results showed that CENPs were upregulated in most tumors compared with normal tissues. We confirmed this conclusion by immunohistochemistry and real-time quantitative PCR. Survival analysis revealed a significant association between high CENP expression and a poor prognosis. CENP expression is related to genome alterations, copy number variation, single nucleotide variation and methylation. Among CENP family genes, CENPF and CENPE are mutated at high frequencies in various tumors, while CENPM and CENPA are less frequently mutated. Furthermore, CENPs regulate the tumor mutational burden, stemness, and microsatellite instability, and are associated with tumor immunity. Most importantly, we revealed that CENP family gene expression was correlated with chemosensitivity and immunotherapy responses.

These findings may clarify the role of CENPs in cancer progression and antitumor drug sensitivity and provide evidence for CENPs as a potential target in pan-cancer.