Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor(Emergent BioSolutions, Inc.)

To determine whether granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)-containing medium could improve embryo-transfer outcomes in frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer.

Patients who underwent frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer (430 women, aged 30-39 years, 566 cycles) were analyzed. Frozen-thawed blastocysts were cultured in GM-CSF-containing medium or control medium for 3-5 h, followed by transfer to the uterus. The embryo-transfer outcomes in the two groups were measured and compared, and a propensity score matching (1:1) method was used to balance the differences in baseline characteristics. We analyzed 213 matched samples.

In patients who underwent frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer with GM-CSF, the percentage of human chorionic gonadotropin-positive cases, biochemical pregnancies, clinical pregnancies, ongoing pregnancies, and live birth rates was 60.6%, 7.98%, 52.6%, 42.9%, and 40.9%, respectively, as compared with 45.1%, 3.29%, 41.8%, 31.1%, and 30.5%, respectively, for the control groups. The rates of human chorionic gonadotropin positivity (odds ratio [OR]: 1.87, 95% confidence interval: [CI]: 1.27-2.75), biochemical pregnancy (2.55, 1.04-6.29), clinical pregnancy (1.54, 1.05-2.27), ongoing pregnancy (1.64, 1.13-2.41), and live birth (1.67, 1.14-2.45) were significantly higher in the GM-CSF group than the control group. The incidence of pregnancy loss (22.3% vs. 27.0%) did not significantly differ between the groups.

The use of a GM-CSF-containing medium for blastocyst-recovery culture improved the live birth rate as a result of increased implantation rate in the frozen-thawed blastocyst-transfer cycle. The use of GM-CSF-containing medium following blastocyst thawing could be an effective choice for improving the blastocyst-transfer outcomes.

Talimogene laherparepvec is a genetically modified herpes simplex virus type 1–based oncolytic immunotherapy for the local treatment of unresectable subcutaneous and nodal tumors in patients with melanoma recurrent after initial surgery. We report on two patients with melanoma who, after progression on numerous systemic therapies, derived clinical benefit from talimogene laherparepvec in an expanded-access protocol (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02147951). Intralesional talimogene laherparepvec (day 1, ≤4 ml 106 PFU/ml; after 3 weeks, ≤4 ml 108 PFU/ml every 2 weeks) was administered until complete response, no injectable tumors, progressive disease, or intolerance occurred. Patient 1 was 71 years old, had stage IIIB disease, and had previously received granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor, vemurafenib, metformin, ipilimumab, dabrafenib, trametinib, and pembrolizumab. Patient 2 was 45 years old, had stage IIIC disease, and had previously received nivolumab/ipilimumab combination therapy. There were marked reductions in the number and size of melanoma lesions during treatment with talimogene laherparepvec. Both patients experienced mild-to-moderate nausea and vomiting, which were managed using ondansetron, metoclopramide, and pantoprazole. Both patients completed treatment with talimogene laherparepvec in the expanded-access protocol on 24 November 2015, but received talimogene laherparepvec in clinical practice. Patient 1 continues to receive therapy (>60 weeks); patient 2 experienced a complete response at 23 weeks. Immunohistochemistry of a biopsied dermal metastasis from patient 1 showed a marked infiltration of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells after 1 year of treatment. Talimogene laherparepvec was active in patients with advanced melanoma with disease progression following multiple previous systemic therapies; no new safety signals were identified.