Anti-CD19 CAR T-cells(KK Women's and Children's Hospital)

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is a rare, heterogeneous, potentially life-threatening autoimmune disease. Presence of kidney or other major organ (brain, heart or lung) involvement are predictors of poor outcome and in a subset of patients resistant to 1st or 2nd line conventional treatment. The 10-year mortality remains around 10-15 %. Chimeric Antigen Receptors (CAR) are molecules that allow to redirect the engineered immune cells towards specific target antigens and to simultaneously boost their activation. Following breakthrough results observed in the treatment of hematological malignancies, conventional CAR T-cell therapy has recently been applied to refractory SLE patients. Compared to the use of monoclonal antibodies, anti-CD19 CAR T-cells allow to achieve deeper depletion of autoreactive B cells, notably at site of inflamed tissues and lymphoid organs (i.e. lymph node), to suppress interferon signature and to restore the immune tolerance with the reemergence of naïve B-cells with a new repertoire. All clinical data reported in SLE patients so far showed that autologous anti-CD19 CAR T-cell treatment allowed impressive short- and longer-term resolution of lupus nephritis and other severe disease-related manifestations, without major toxicities and only mild cytokine-release syndrome. These clinical effects persisted after B-cell reconstitution and were associated with normalization of double-stranded DNA antibodies and complement levels in drug-free patients until three years after the procedure. Overall, these pioneering experiences show unique clinical and immunological response to CAR T-cell therapy in SLE, and the need for extended follow-up to determine its long-term efficacy.

Seizures may occur in up to 30% of non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients who received anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy, yet the optimal anti-seizure medication (ASM) prevention strategy has not been thoroughly investigated.

Consecutive patients affected by refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma who received anti-CD19 CAR T-cells were included. Patients were selected and assessed using similar internal protocols. ASM was started either as a primary prophylaxis (PP-group) before CAR T-cells infusion or as a pre-emptive therapy (PET-group) only upon the onset of neurotoxicity development.

One hundred fifty-six patients were included (PP-group = 88, PET-group = 66). Overall, neurotoxicity and severe neurotoxicity occurred in 45 (29%) and 20 (13%) patients, respectively, equally distributed between the two groups. Five patients experienced epileptic events (PET-group = 3 [4%]; PP-group = 2 [2%]). For all the PET-group patients, seizure/status epilepticus occurred in the absence of overt CAR-T-related neurotoxicity, whereas patients in the PP-group experienced brief seizures only in the context of critical neurotoxicity with progressive severe encephalopathy. ASMs were well-tolerated by all patients, even without titration. No patients developed epilepsy or required long-term ASMs.

Our data suggest that both primary and pre-emptive anti-seizure prophylaxis are safe and effective in anti-CD19 CAR T-cell recipients. Clinical rationale suggests a possible more favourable profile of primary prophylaxis, yet no definitive conclusion of superiority between the two ASM strategies can be drawn from our study.