UK-101

Although the proteasome is a validated anticancer target, the clinical application of its inhibitors has been limited because of inherent systemic toxicity. To broaden clinical utility of proteasome inhibitors as anticancer agents, it is critical to develop strategies to selectively target proteasomes in cancer cells. The immunoproteasome is an alternative form of the constitutive proteasome that is expressed at high levels in cancer tissues, but not in most normal cells in the body.

To validate the immunoproteasome as a chemotherapeutic target, an immunoproteasome catalytic subunit LMP2-targeting inhibitor and siRNA were used. The sensitivity of PC-3 prostate cancer cells to these reagents was investigated using viability assays. Further, a xenograft model of prostate cancer was studied to test the in vivo effects of LMP2 inhibition.

A small molecule inhibitor of the immunoproteasome subunit LMP2, UK-101, induced apoptosis of PC-3 cells and resulted in significant inhibition (~50-60%) of tumour growth in vivo. Interestingly, UK-101 did not block degradation of IκBα in PC-3 cells treated with TNF-α, suggesting that its mode of action may be different from that of general proteasome inhibitors, such as bortezomib, which block IκBα degradation.

These results strongly suggest that the immunoproteasome has important roles in cancer cell growth and thus provide a rationale for targeting the immunoproteasome in the treatment of prostate cancer.

The discovery of NF-κB signaling pathways has greatly enhanced our understanding of inflammatory and immune responses. In the canonical NF-κB pathway, the proteasomal degradation of IκBα, an inhibitory protein of NF-κB, is widely accepted to be a key regulatory step. However, contradictory findings have been reported as to whether the immunoproteasome plays an obligatory role in the degradation of IκBα and activation of the canonical NF-κB pathway. Such results were obtained mainly using traditional gene deletion strategies. Here, we have revisited the involvement of the immunoproteasome in the canonical NF-κB pathway using small molecule inhibitors of the immunoproteasome, namely UK-101 and LKS01 targeting β1i and β5i, respectively. H23 and Panc-1 cancer cells were pretreated with UK-101, LKS01 or epoxomicin (a prototypic inhibitor targeting both the constitutive proteasome and immunoproteasome). We then examined whether these pretreatments lead to any defect in activating the canonical NF-κB pathway following TNFα exposure by monitoring the phosphorylation and degradation of IκBα, nuclear translocation of NF-κB proteins and DNA binding and transcriptional activity of NF-κB. Our results consistently indicated that there is no defect in activating the canonical NF-κB pathway following selective inhibition of the immunoproteasome catalytic subunits β1i, β5i or both using UK-101 and LKS01, in contrast to epoxomicin. In summary, our current results using chemical genetic approaches strongly support that the catalytic activity of the immunoproteasome subunits β1i and β5i is not required for canonical NF-κB activation in lung and pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell line models.