CIGB-300

Quantitative phosphoproteomic data has mostly been reported from experiments comparing relative phosphopeptides intensities in two or more different conditions, while the ideal parameter to compare is phosphopeptides occupancies. This term is scarcely used and therefore barely implemented in phosphoproteomics studies, and this should be of concern for the scientific journals. In order to demonstrate the relevance of this issue, here we show how the method of choice affects the interpretation of the data. The phosphoproteomic profile modulated in two AML cell lines after CK2 inhibition with CIGB-300 or CX-4945 is shown. Following the downstream action of CK2 the phosphosite intensity and occupancy results were compared to validate the best approach for quantitative phosphoproteomic studies. Even when the total number of quantified phosphopeptides was higher by using the intensity calculation, in all the cases the percent of CK2 consensus sequences which were down-regulated in response to CK2 inhibition was higher using the phosphosite occupancy quantification. To note, a high number of CK2 consensus sequences was found down-regulated with at least a 10% or 15% of phosphosite occupancy variation illustrating that low thresholds of occupancy modulation might be indicative of biological effect. Additionally, several biological processes only appear significantly over-represented in the phosphoproteome quantified by occupancy. The functional enrichment analysis per ranges of occupancy variations also illustrated clear differences among AML cell lines subjected to CK2 inhibition by CX-4945. A low overlap between the phosphoproteomes quantified by intensity and occupancy was obtained illustrating that new developments in proteomics techniques are needed to improve the performance of the occupancy approach. Even in such context, results indicate that occupancy quantification performs better than phosphorylation quantification based on intensity reinforcing the importance of such quantification approach to describe phosphoproteomic data.

Liver fibrosis is caused by a variety of chronic liver injuries and has caused significant morbidity and mortality in the world with increasing tendency. Elucidation of the molecular mechanism of liver fibrosis is the basis for intervention of this pathological process and drug development. Nucleophosmin (NPM) is a widely expressed nucleolar phosphorylated protein, which is particularly important for cell proliferation, differentiation and survival. The biological role of NPM in liver fibrosis remains unknown. Here we show that NPM promotes liver fibrosis through multiple pathways. Our study found that NPM was up-regulated in cirrhosis tissues and activated in hepatic stellate cells (HSCs). NPM inhibition reduced liver fibrosis markers expression in HSCs and inhibited the HSCs proliferation and migration. In mice model, NPM knockdown in HSCs or application of specific NPM inhibitor can remarkably attenuate hepatic fibrosis. Mechanistic analysis showed that NPM promotes hepatic fibrosis by inhibiting HSCs apoptosis through Akt/ROS pathway and by upregulating TGF-β2 through Akt-induced lncMIAT. LncMIAT up-regulated TGF-β2 mRNA by competitively sponging miR-16-5p. In response to liver injury, hepatocytes, Kupffer cells and HSCs up-regulated NPM to increase TGF-β2 secretion to activate HSCs in a paracrine or autocrine manner, leading to increased liver fibrosis. Our study demonstrated that NPM regulated hepatotoxin-induced fibrosis through Akt/ROS-induced apoptosis of HSCs and via the Akt/lncMIAT-up-regulated TGF-β2. Inhibition of NPM or application of NPM inhibitor CIGB300 remarkably attenuated liver fibrosis. NPM serves a potential new drug target for liver fibrosis.