Objective:To compare the therapeutic effects of intrauterine perfusion treatments with platelet rich plasma(PRP) or granulocyte colony stimulating factor(G-CSF) on thin endometrium patients undergoing IVF-ET.Methods:The thin endometrium patients undergoing frozen embryo transfer in our reproductive center from July 2018 to March 2020 were randomly divided into three groups:PRP intrauterine perfusion(PRP group,n=80),G-CSF intrauterine perfusion(G-CSF group,n=81) and normal saline intrauterine perfusion(control group,n=68).The platelet concentration in whole blood of PRP group was measured to test the effectiveness of PRP preparationThe general condition,endometrium thickness and blood flow classification,embryo implantation rate,clin. pregnancy rate and early miscarriage rate were compared among the three groups.Results:There was no significant difference in basic general conditions among the three groups(P>0.05).The platelet concentration in PRP was significantly higher than that in whole blood in PRP group [(433.83±36.76)x10∼9/L vs.(137.17±24.94)x10∼9/L](P<0.001).There was no significant difference in endometrial thickness in the previous cycle among the three groups(P>0.05).The thickness of endometrium on embryo transfer day after intrauterine perfusion in PRP group and G-CSF group was(7.84±0.88) mm and(7.60±0.86) mm,resp.,which were significantly higher than that before treatment(P<0.001).There was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05),but those were all significantly higher than the control group(6.98±0.65)(P<0.001).The proportion of patients with grade B and C blood flow after therapy in PRP group and G-CSF group was significantly higher than that in the control group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the number of embryo transferred,embryo implantation rate,clin. pregnancy rate and early miscarriage rate among the three groups(P>0.05).Conclusions:PRP and G-CSF intrauterine perfusion can significantly promote the growth of thin endometrium and improve endometrium blood flow,and the effect of the two methods is similar,but the clin. pregnancy rate is not significantly improved.