Background: Myocardial ischemia remains a significant global health concern for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In addition to the traditional treatment modalities, stem cell transplantation is emerging as a promising therapeutic intervention for cardiac regeneration and functional recovery. Our study evaluated the efficacy and clinical impact of SCT by reducing infarct scar size and improving cardiac function. The secondary objectives are to compare stem cell types, identify optimal transplantation strategies, and address safety and feasibility.Method: Randomized controlled trials from January 2000 to July 2023 were collected from PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Elsevier. Based on criteria and evidence quality, screening and selection were done. A RevMan analysis was done. Infarct size, LVEF, LVESV, LVEDV, and mortality were measured. Comparator variables included placebo, medical therapy, CABG, and other types of stem cells. Randomization, allocation concealment, blinding, and therapeutic interventions differed among trials. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed using random-effects model and funnel plots. Sensitivity analysis and meta-regression identified outcome variability.Results: Seventeen studies (n = 1022 patients) met the inclusion criteria, encompassing various cell types, doses, and administration routes. Compared to controls, SCT greatly enhanced LVEF (MD: 3.39, 95% CI: 1.05 to 5.73, p = 0.005) and reduced infarct size (MD: 14.23, 95% CI: 7.12 to 21.35, p<0.0001) with an average dose of 2.03 x 107 cells/ml injected intracoronarily directly into the infarcted myocardium or the target vessel. LVESV (MD: -2.63, 95% CI: -7.99 to 2.73, p = 0.34) or LVEDV (MD: -2.00, 95% CI: -4.40 to 0.40, p = 0.10) did not improve. Differences in mortality rates were insignificant (OR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.29 to 1.74, p = 0.46). A diverse range of patients was included, leading to moderate heterogeneity (I^2 = 52%).Conclusion: SCT shows potential benefits for cardiac regeneration and functional improvement. The analysis is robust, with no publication bias and mild attrition bias issues. Due to low mortality, safety was comparable to conventional therapy. These findings highlight the need for SCT strategy optimization and long-term clinical outcome studies.