Multiple antigen specific cell therapy(Hengrui Yuanzheng Bio-Technology Co., Ltd.)

The lethal effects of multiple antigen-specific cellular therapy (MASCT) may be enhanced by blocking PD-1 in vitro and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 inhibitor (apatinib). We analyzed the pooled data from our phase I/II trials to determine the toxicity and efficacy of PD-1 blockade (SHR-1210)-activated MASCT (aMASCT) alone or in combination with apatinib in advanced solid tumors.

Patients with advanced solid tumors received aMASCT alone (n = 32) or aMASCT plus apatinib (500 mg q.d., n = 38) after standard treatment. The safety profile was the primary end point. The secondary end points were antitumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The circulating T cells were quantified before and after aMASCT infusion.

Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 18/32 (56.3%) and 25/38 (65.8%) patients in the aMASCT and aMASCT plus apatinib groups, respectively. No serious AEs were reported, and apatinib did not increase immunotherapy-related toxicity. The objective response rate (34.2% and 18.8%) and PFS (median 6.0 and 4.5 months, P = 0.002) were improved in the aMASCT plus apatinib group compared with the aMASCT group; however, the OS was not improved (median 10.0 and 8.2 months, P = 0.098). Multivariate analyses indicated that two or more cycles of aMASCT treatment was an independent and favorable prognostic factor of PFS and OS. The circulating T cells increased and Tregs decreased in both groups after one cycle of aMASCT treatment.

Treatment with aMASCT plus apatinib was safe and effective for the management of advanced solid tumors.

Background & Aims: The prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains poor and available treatment options are limited. This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of Multiple Antigen Stimulating Cell Therapy (MASCT) as an adjuvant therapy for the treatment of HCC after curative treatment. Methods: Patients who underwent HCC curative treatments were classified into two groups: the MASCT group, in which patients received MASCT treatment after curative treatment (n = 47), and the control group, in which patients did not receive any treatment after curative treatment (n = 99). Patients who received ≥ 5 courses of MASCT treatment before recurrence or death (n = 26) were further stratified into a subgroup (multiple-course MASCT group) for analysis. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and safety. Results: Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no statistically significant difference in OS between the MASCT group and the control group (P = 0.132), nor in DFS (P = 0.310) (median: 36.17 vs. 24.27 months). However, when comparing the multiple-course MASCT treated group to the control group, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significant difference in OS (P = 0.011), but not in DFS (P = 0.104) (median: 47.10 vs. 24.27 months). The overall incidences of treatment-related adverse events in the MASCT group and control group were 14.89% (7/47) and 19.19% (19/99), respectively. No MASCT treatment-related serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions: Although the MASCT group was not associated with significantly longer OS or DFS, the multiple-course MASCT group showed significantly improved overall survival after curative treatment, and the treatment procedures were well-tolerated. Multiple-course MASCT may therefore provide another choice for patients with HCC after curative treatment.