Galeterone

Galeterone, a novel prostate cancer candidate treatment, was discontinued after a Phase III clinical trial due to lack of efficacy. Galeterone is weakly basic and exhibits low solubility in biorelevant media (i.e., ~ 2 µg/mL in fasted simulated intestinal fluid). It was formulated as a 50-50 (w/w) galeterone-hypromellose acetate succinate spray-dried dispersion to increase its bioavailability. Despite this increase, the bioavailability of this formulation may have been insufficient and contributed to its clinical failure. We hypothesized that reformulating galeterone as an amorphous solid dispersion by KinetiSol® compounding could increase its bioavailability. In this study, we examined the effects of composition and manufacturing technology (Kinetisol and spray drying) on the performance of galeterone amorphous solid dispersions. KinetiSol compounding was utilized to create galeterone amorphous solid dispersions containing the complexing agent hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin or hypromellose acetate succinate with lower drug loads that both achieved a ~ 6 × increase in dissolution performance versus the 50-50 spray-dried dispersion. When compared to a spray-dried dispersion with an equivalent drug load, the KinetiSol amorphous solid dispersions formulations exhibited ~ 2 × exposure in an in vivo rat study. Acid-base surface energy analysis showed that the equivalent composition of the KinetiSol amorphous solid dispersion formulation better protected the weakly basic galeterone from premature dissolution in acidic media and thereby reduced precipitation, inhibited recrystallization, and extended the extent of supersaturation during transit into neutral intestinal media.

VNPP433-3β (compound 2, (3β-(1H-imidazole-1-yl)-17-(1H-benzimidazole-1-yl)-androsta-5,16-diene), a multitarget anticancer agent has emerged as our lead next generation galeterone analogs (NGGA). Compound 2 is currently in development as potential new therapeutic for prostate and pancreatic cancers. The preliminary toxicity study reveals that the compound 2 was better tolerated by the normal male CD-1 mice than the male Nude mice. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in the Nude mice was estimated to be between 25 < 50 mg/kg. After oral dosing of compound 2 to male and female rats, the plasma concentration versus time curves were very consistent between animals and the AUC_last increased with dose. Many plasmas concentration versus time curves profiles were nearly flat over 24 hr., suggesting extended absorption from the GI tract. Consequently, reliable values for half-life and AUC_inf were not determined. Calculated oral bioavailability (using oral AUC_last and excluding the outlier IV animal) ranged from 32 to 47 %. This should be considered a minimum value since the contribution to true AUC beyond 24 hr. is clearly not zero. Clearly, these toxicology and pharmacokinetics parameters pave the way for understanding the anticancer pharmacological actions and provide a meaningful basis for further preclinical development and eventual clinical development.