Eptacog alfa(Novo Nordisk A/S)

Prevention of bleeding and its consequences is the main goal of hemophilia treatment and determines treatment choices for patients who develop inhibitors. To assess bleeding before and during immune tolerance induction (ITI) and its association with ITI regimen and inhibitor titer, we selected and analyzed data on patients receiving high-titer inhibitors from the international prospective PedNet cohort study. In total, 222 patients with severe hemophilia A and inhibitor titers of >5 Bethesda units (BU) were followed from the first positive to the first negative inhibitor result (median overall follow-up, 1.7 years). Mean annual (joint) bleeding rates (AJBR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were compared according to treatment and inhibitor titer using multivariable negative binomial regression. Before ITI, 115 patients showed an ABR of 6.1 (5.0-7.4) and an AJBR 2.6 (2.1-3.2). Bleeding was independent of inhibitor titer. During ITI, 202 patients had an ABR of 4.4 (3.9-5.1) and an AJBR of 1.7 (1.5-2.0). AJBR during ITI increased with inhibitor titer (hazard ratio [HR] for ≥200 BU vs 5 to 39 BU [4.9; CI, 3.2-7.4]) and decreased with daily ITI infusions (HR, 0.4; CI, 0.3-0.6) or activated prothrombin complex concentrate prophylaxis (HR, 0.4; CI, 0.2-0.8), whereas ITI dose and recombinant activated factor VII prophylaxis did not independently affect bleeding. These data provide evidence for a protective effect of repeated FVIII infusions (ITI) on bleeding in patients who have developed inhibitors; these data should be used to plan ITI and/or serve as a comparator for prophylaxis with nonreplacement therapy.

Hepatic impairment (HI) moderately (<5‐fold) affects the systemic exposure (i.e., area under the plasma concentration–time curve [AUC]) of drugs that are substrates of the hepatic sinusoidal organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) transporters and are excreted unchanged in the bile and/or urine. However, the effect of HI on their AUC is much greater (>10‐fold) for drugs that are also substrates of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A enzymes. Using the extended clearance model, through simulations, we identified the ratio of sinusoidal efflux clearance (CL) over the sum of metabolic and biliary CLs as important in predicting the impact of HI on the AUC of dual OATP/CYP3A substrates. Because HI may reduce hepatic CYP3A‐mediated CL to a greater extent than biliary efflux CL, the greater the contribution of the former versus the latter, the greater the impact of HI on drug AUC ratio (AUCRHI). Using physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation, we predicted relatively well the AUCRHI of OATP substrates that are not significantly metabolized (pitavastatin, rosuvastatin, valsartan, and gadoxetic acid). However, there was a trend toward underprediction of the AUCRHI of the dual OATP/CYP3A4 substrates fimasartan and atorvastatin. These predictions improved when the sinusoidal efflux CL of these two drugs was increased in healthy volunteers (i.e., before incorporating the effect of HI), and by modifying the directionality of its modulation by HI (i.e., increase or decrease). To accurately predict the effect of HI on AUC of hepatobiliary cleared drugs it is important to accurately predict all hepatobiliary pathways, including sinusoidal efflux CL.