OBJECTIVETo evaluate parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) regarding localization, surgical characteristics, and treatment outcomes.METHODSSeventy-eight patients who underwent parathyroidectomy for PHPT were retrospectively reviewed. The results were analyzed according to intraoperative localization technique (IOLT), intraoperative parathyroid hormone (IOPTH) monitoring, and intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM). The localization accuracy of ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)-CT with sestamibi Tc99m was evaluated.RESULTSParathyroidectomy was successfully completed in all 78 patients, achieving 100% surgical cure. For 60 patients with IOPTH monitoring, 10-min IOPTH decreased >50% from baseline in 57 (95.0%), and they achieved surgical cure. In the remaining three (5.0%) patients with ≤50% decrease in 10-min IOPTH, 20-min IOPTH decreased >50% from baseline in two (3.3%) patients, achieving surgical cure without additional neck exploration. There were no differences in surgical cure and complications as a function of IOLT use or IOPTH monitoring. Operating time was significantly shorter with IOLT and IOPTH monitoring than without (IOLT: 70.9 min vs. 88.0 min, p = 0.013; IOPTH: 74.9 min vs. 91.9 min, p = 0.037). All 78 patients had adenoma including one patient with a double adenoma. Vocal cord paralysis was not observed in our series, regardless of IONM. US, CT, and SPECT-CT localized the pathological parathyroid gland accurately in 88.1%, 85.5%, and 86.8% of patients, respectively (p = 0.894).CONCLUSIONThe surgical outcomes of parathyroidectomy for PHPT were excellent regardless of IOLT and IOPTH monitoring. However, these techniques can maximize the performance of parathyroid surgery by reducing operating time and rescuing challenging cases.