Tenilsetam

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of age-related neurodegeneration occurs because of deposition of proteins in the form of extracellular plaques containing aggregated amyloid beta (Aβ) peptide and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles composed of aggregated microtubule-binding protein tau. Amyloid aggregation process can be enhanced by several familial AD-associated mutations in Aβ peptide. In this study, we have unravelled the interactions of 40 small molecule inhibitors with the Osaka-mutant of Aβ_1-40 peptide at atomic level and characterized modes of their binding to mutant Aβ by docking approaches. We have also compared docking energies of these inhibitors with Osaka-mutant with those previously determined for the wild-type and Iowa-mutant peptides and discussed in light of the peptide conformations and non-covalent interactions. We have also discussed inhibition mechanisms of these three peptides. Our analyses revealed that these small molecules can efficiently inhibit Osaka-mutant. The binding modes of drugs with these three peptides are markedly different and so are the mechanisms of inhibition of these three peptides. Overall analysis of the data reveals that binding energy of Iowa-mutant drug complex is lowest and most stable which is followed wild-type peptide-drug complex followed by Osaka-mutant drug complex.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of neurodegenerative diseases, characterized by the deposition of Aβ (amyloid beta) peptide. In this study, we have unravelled the interactions as well as anti amyloidogenic behaviour of 40 small molecule inhibitors with Aβ_1-40 peptide and Iowa mutant D₂₃N-Aβ1_15-42 peptide at atomic level and their modes of binding by docking approaches. The binding mode between wild type peptide and drug is distinctly different from the Iowa-mutant-peptide and drug. Here we proposed possible mechanisms of amyloid beta peptide inhibition by small molecule and prevent monomer-monomer interactions via at least three different mechanisms. In the first mechanism, four catechins efficiently interacted with the C-terminal region of peptides through hydrogen bonds and inhibited the peptides. This may lead to blockage of access of second molecule of Aβ-peptide. Secondly, in the case Iowa mutant D23N-Aβ_15-42 peptide, same catechin form hydrogen bond with the important mutated Asn₂₃ residue which acts as hydrogen bond donor and acceptor leading to tight binding of inhibitor with the peptide and may prevent monomer-monomer interactions. The third mechanism relies on the ability of drug molecules to mask hydrophobic residues of the peptide, thereby possibly inhibiting hydrophobic interactions between the two beta peptides.