Vitespen(Agenus, Inc)

BACKGROUND. Heat shock protein peptide complex-96 (HSPPC-96) triggers adaptive and innate antitumor immune responses. The safety and efficacy of HSPPC-96 vaccination was examined in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). METHODS. In this open-label, single-arm, phase I study, adult patients were vaccinated with HSPPC-96 in combination with the standard treatment for newly diagnosed GBM after surgical resection. Primary endpoints were frequency of adverse events and progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), PFS, and tumor-specific immune response (TSIR). RESULTS. A total of 20 patients with newly diagnosed GBM were enrolled from September 2013 to February 2015. No grade 3 or 4 vaccine-related adverse events were noted. After a median follow-up of 42.3 months, PFS was 89.5% (95% CI, 66.9%–98.7%) at 6 months, median PFS was 11.0 months (95% CI, 8.2–13.8), and median OS was 31.4 months (95% CI, 14.9–47.9). TSIR was significantly increased by 2.3-fold (95% CI, 1.7–3.2) after vaccination. Median OS for patients with high TSIR after vaccination was >40.5 months (95% CI, incalculable) as compared with 14.6 months (95% CI, 7.0–22.2) for patients with low TSIR after vaccination (hazard ratio, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.071–0.90; P = 0.034). A multivariate Cox regression model revealed TSIR after vaccination as a primary independent predicator for survival. CONCLUSION. The HSPPC-96 vaccination, combined with the standard therapy, is a safe and effective strategy for treatment of newly diagnosed GBM patients. TSIR after vaccination would be a good indicator predicting the vaccine efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02122822. FUNDING. National Key Technology Research and Development Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2014BAI04B01, 2014BAI04B02), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (7164253), Beijing Talents Fund (2014000021469G257), and Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee (JSGG20170413151359491).

The GeparSepto study demonstrated that the use of nab-paclitaxel instead of paclitaxel prior to anthracycline-based chemotherapy could lead to a significantly increased pCR rate, especially in the triple negative subpopulation. We report efficacy and safety for patients treated with two different doses of nab-paclitaxel in comparison to weekly solvent-formulated paclitaxel.

Patients were treated for 12 weeks with either intravenous nab-paclitaxel 150 mg/m² (nP150) weekly, after study amendment 125 mg/m² (nP125) weekly or solvent-based paclitaxel 80 mg/m² (P80) weekly followed by epirubicin 90 mg/m² and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m² on day 1 for four 3-week cycles.

229 patients received nP150, 377 nP125. Baseline characteristics were fairly balanced between these two sequential cohorts as well as compared to 601 patients receiving P80 except for hormone receptor status, HER2 status, and Ki67. Taxane treatment was discontinued in 26.8% (nP150), 16.6% (nP125), and 13.3% of (P80) patients, respectively. Median relative total dose intensity (mRTDI) based on 125 mg/m² for nP was 103% with nP150, 95% with nP125, 99% with P80 before and 98% with P80 after the amendment. PSN grade 3-4 was observed in 14.5% of patients with nP150, 8.1% of patients with nP125 (p = 0.018), and 2.7% of patients with P80. Overall pCR before the amendment was 33.6% after nP150 and 23.5% after P80 (OR 1.65 [95% CI 1.10-2.50]; p = 0.022); pCR after the amendment was 41.4% after nP125, and 32.4% after P80 (1.48 [95% CI 1.10-1.99]; p = 0.013).

Nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m² was associated with a better safety profile and compliance without compromising the efficacy compared to nab-paclitaxel 150 mg/m².