Ciprofloxacin Betaine/Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride

Two open‐label, randomized, 2‐way crossover studies (1 single‐dose and 1 steady‐state) were conducted in healthy volunteers to compare the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a novel extended‐release ciprofloxacin (ciprofloxacin ER; 500 mg once daily) and immediate‐release ciprofloxacin (ciprofloxacin IR; 250 mg twice daily). For both studies, mean ciprofloxacin maximum concentration (Cmax) values after once‐daily ciprofloxacin ER were significantly greater than those after the first daily dose of ciprofloxacin IR (P < .0001) but were lower than those after the second daily dose of ciprofloxacin IR (P < .05). The relative bioavailability of ciprofloxacin ER compared to ciprofloxacin IR was 93.8% in the single‐dose study and 97.7% in the steady‐state study. Mean urinary ciprofloxacin concentrations and excretion rates after either treatment were substantially greater than the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for susceptible uropathogens in both studies. The area under the concentration‐time curve (AUC)/MIC, Cmax/MIC, amount excreted (Ae)/MIC, and Ae24/MIC ratios with ciprofloxacin ER were similar to or slightly greater than with ciprofloxacin IR for all susceptible organisms.

The efficacy and safety of a novel once-daily extended-release ciprofloxacin (ciprofloxacin ER) 500-mg dose were compared with those of an immediate-release ciprofloxacin (ciprofloxacin IR) 250-mg twice-daily dose, each administered orally for 3 days in the treatment of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) in women. Adult female outpatients (mean age, 39 years) with clinical signs and symptoms of acute uUTI and a positive pretreatment urine culture (≥10 5 CFU/ml) were enrolled in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial. Patients were assessed at a test-of-cure visit (4 to 11 days posttreatment) and a late-posttreatment visit (4 to 6 weeks posttreatment) for microbiological and clinical outcomes and safety. The primary efficacy endpoint and microbiological eradication rate at the test-of-cure visit in the ciprofloxacin ER group (254/272; 93.4%) were noninferior to those in the ciprofloxacin IR group (225/251; 89.6%) (95% confidence interval [CI] of difference, −0.99%, 8.59%). Clinical-cure rates at the test-of-cure visit were 85.7% (233/272) for ciprofloxacin ER and 86.1% (216/251) for ciprofloxacin IR (95% CI of difference, −6.37%, 5.57%). At the late-posttreatment visit, microbiological and clinical outcomes were similar for the two treatments and consistent with test-of-cure results. Both treatments were well tolerated, but the frequencies of nausea and diarrhea were lower in the ciprofloxacin ER group than in the ciprofloxacin IR group (nausea, ER, 0.6%; IR, 2.2%; P = 0.033; diarrhea, ER, 0.2%; IR, 1.4%; P = 0.037). Once-daily ciprofloxacin ER was safe, effective, and noninferior to twice-daily ciprofloxacin IR in the treatment of acute uUTI. Additionally, ciprofloxacin ER was associated with significantly reduced frequencies of nausea and diarrhea.