Traumatic brain injury (TBI) affects 1.6 million Americans annually. The injury severity impacts the overall outcome and likelihood for survival. Current treatment of acute TBI includes surgical intervention and supportive care therapies. Treatment of elevated intracranial pressure and optimizing cerebral perfusion are cornerstones of current therapy. These approaches do not directly address the secondary neurological sequelae that lead to continued brain injury after TBI. Depending on injury severity, a complex cascade of processes are activated and generate continued endogenous changes affecting cellular systems and overall outcome from the initial insult to the brain. Homeostatic cellular processes governing calcium influx, mitochondrial function, membrane stability, redox balance, blood flow and cytoskeletal structure often become dysfunctional after TBI. Interruption of this cascade has been the target of numerous pharmacotherapeutic agents investigated over the last two decades. Many agents such as selfotel, pegorgotein (PEG-SOD), magnesium, deltibant and dexanabinol were ineffective in clinical trials. While progesterone and ciclosporin have shown promise in phase II studies, success in larger phase III, randomized, multicentre, clinical trials is pending. Consequently, no neuroprotective treatment options currently exist that improve neurological outcome after TBI. Investigations to date have extended understanding of the injury mechanisms and sites for intervention. Examination of novel strategies addressing both pathological and pharmacological factors affecting outcome, employing novel trial design methods and utilizing biomarkers validated to be reflective of the prognosis for TBI will facilitate progress in overcoming the obstacles identified from previous clinical trials.

01 Jan 2002·Folia Pharmacologica Japonica

Bradykinin antagonist: Current status and perspective.

Review

Author: Hirayama, Yoshitaka ; Kayakiri, Hiroshi

The kallikrein-kinin system plays an important role in many physiological and pathophysiological conditions such as homeostasis of circulation, inflammation/allergy, pain, shock, etc. Two types of kinin receptor are known, bradykinin (BK) B1 receptor and BK B2 receptor. B2 receptors are constitutively expressed and mediate most physiological actions of kinins, whereas B1 receptors are highly inducible upon inflammatory stimulation or tissue injury, suggesting that they are involved in inflammation and/or nociception. Only three peptide type B2 antagonists, NPC 567, CP-0127 and HOE-140, have been evaluated in clinical studies so far, and some beneficial effects of B2 antagonists have been shown for rhinitis, asthma, systemic inflammatory response syndrome/sepsis and brain injury. However, the results were less convincing than expected. Now several potent and orally active nonpeptide B2-receptor antagonists have been found, which are expected to overcome the weak point of the peptide type antagonists and clarify the therapeutic potential of the B2-receptor antagonist for novel indications as well as those mentioned above. As for B1 receptors, no antagonist has been tested in a clinical trial. The important role of B1 receptors is just being elucidated by use of peptide type antagonists or B1 receptor gene knockout mice. The further development of newer B1 antagonists and clinical evaluation is desired.

01 Jun 1999·Journal of NeurotraumaQ2 · MEDICINE

Effects of the Bradykinin Antagonist Bradycor™ (Deltibant, CP-1027) in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Results of a Multi-Center, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Q2 · MEDICINE

Article

Author: Troha, J ; Burgess, J ; Nichols, J ; Pitts, L ; Marmarou, A ; Burnham, D ; Newell, D

A phase II prospective, randomized, double blind clinical trial of Bradycor, a bradykinin antagonist, was conducted at 31 centers within North America in severely brain injured patients. Patients of Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) 3-8 (n = 139) with at least one reactive pupil were randomized to receive either Bradycor, 3 microg/kg/min or placebo as a continuous intravenous infusion for 5 days, with the infusion beginning within 12 h of the injury. The primary objective was to assess the efficacy of a continuous infusion of Bradycor (3.0 mc/kg/min) in preventing elevation of intracranial pressure (ICP). Other efficacy measures included the effect of Bradycor on the Therapy Intensity Level (TIL), mortality, and functional outcome. A secondary objective was to evaluate the safety of Bradycor in patients with severe brain injury. Randomization was carried out according to a computer generated randomization list. Patients were followed for the first 14 days of hospitalization with long-term outcome assessed at 3 and 6 months after injury. During the infusion and while the ICP monitor was in place, ICP measurements were recorded hourly along with blood pressure and heart rate. A modified version of the TIL was used to record therapeutic interventions hourly, while the ICP was being monitored. Outcome was assessed at 3 and 6 months after injury using the Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS). Bradycor was well tolerated in this patient population, and no adverse events were attributable to the compound. Although positive trends were seen for both ICP and TIL in the Bradycor group, these differences analyzed on a daily basis were not significant. However, a mixed model of variance which included treatment, day, treatment by day interaction, age and GCS revealed that the percentage time ICP of >15 mm Hg on days 4 and 5 was significantly lower in the Bradycor group compared to placebo (p = 0.035). There were fewer deaths in the Bradycor group, which had a 28-day all cause mortality of 20% versus 27% on placebo. Patients treated with Bradycor showed a 10.3% improvement in favorable outcome at 3 months and a 12% improvement in dichotomized GOS at 6 months (p = 0.26). The consistent positive trends seen in ICP, TIL, neuropsychological tests, and, most importantly, 3- and 6-month GOS provide supportive evidence that a bradykinin antagonist may play a neuroprotective role in severe brain injury.

100 Deals associated with Deltibant

External Link

KEGG	Wiki	ATC	Drug Bank
D03677	-	-	-

R&D Status

10 top R&D records.

to view more data

Indication	Highest Phase	Country/Location	Organization	Date
Brain Edema	Phase 3	US	-	-
Brain Injuries	Phase 3	US	-	-
Shock	Phase 3	US	-	-
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome	Phase 3	-	Cortech, Inc.	-
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome	Phase 3	US	-	-
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome	Phase 3	-	Abbott Laboratories	-

Clinical Result

Indication

Phase

Evaluation

View All Results

Translational Medicine

Boost your research with our translational medicine data.

view full example data

Deal

Boost your decision using our deal data.

view full example data

Core Patent

Boost your research with our Core Patent data.

view full example data

Clinical Trial

Identify the latest clinical trials across global registries.

view full example data

Approval

Accelerate your research with the latest regulatory approval information.

view full example data

Regulation

Understand key drug designations in just a few clicks with Synapse.

view full example data

Chat with Hiro

Get started for free today!

Accelerate Strategic R&D decision making with Synapse, PatSnap’s AI-powered Connected Innovation Intelligence Platform Built for Life Sciences Professionals.

Start your data trial now!

Synapse data is also accessible to external entities via APIs or data packages. Empower better decisions with the latest in pharmaceutical intelligence.

Bio

Bio Sequences Search & Analysis

Chemical

Chemical Structures Search & Analysis