Ethinyl Estradiol/Dienogest

Currently the use of natural estradiol as estrogenic component in oral contraceptives is more and more extended. It is unknown whether the application of this estrogen is associated with a different breast cancer risk as compared to the common use of the synthetic ethinylestradiol. In addition with the intention to reduce menstruation associated symptoms and bleeding periods an extended-cycle regimen is currently considered. In the present in vitro work, we have compared the effect of these different estrogenic compounds and the different treatment regimens on breast cancer risk. Human breast cancer cells (ZR75-1 and HCC1500) were incubated with equimolar concentrations of estradiol or ethinylestradiol combined with various progestogens, dienogest, drospirenone, keto-desogestrel, levonorgestrel, and nomegestrel. Usual and extended cycle was mimicked by incubation periods of 3 days with 1 day hormones off and 4 days, respectively. Molecular markers for proliferation and apoptosis were investigated by Western blot. In both cell lines estradiol and ethinylestradiol elicited a significant increase in the proliferation rate without difference between the 2 estrogens. The effect in the long-term cycle tended to be more pronounced than in the intermitted cycle. Progestogen addition most significantly reduced the estrogen-induced proliferation rate. The molecular markers were influenced by the progestogens mostly in the same manner, reducing the proliferation/apoptosis rate. Our results indicate that both estrogenic based combinations with progestogens may not increase breast cancer risk independent from the regimen, intermitted or long-term cycle. However clinical studies are necessary to prove these in vitro results.

Aims  Plasma glucose levels influence growth hormone concentrations. Oral contraceptives are known to affect circulating growth hormone levels and glucose metabolism. While growth hormone plays an important role in hypoglycaemia counter‐regulation, it has been shown that oral contraceptives increase growth hormone concentrations. In this context, we tested if serum growth hormone concentrations display a differential response on glycaemic variations in healthy women using oral contraceptives and those not using contraceptives.Methods  Fifteen healthy women with oral contraceptive treatment and 10 without participated in a stepwise hyper‐ and hypoglycaemic glucose clamp procedure. Serum growth hormone concentrations were measured at euglycaemic baseline and subsequently at plasma glucose plateaus of 8.8, 6.8, 4.8 and 2.8 mmol/l.Results  Growth hormone values were significantly higher in women using oral contraceptives throughout the experiments (P = 0.001). Hyperglycaemia decreased growth hormone concentrations in women using oral contraceptives (P = 0.009), but not in those who were not using oral contraceptives (P = 0.241). Hypoglycaemia significantly elevated growth hormone concentrations in women using oral contraceptives (P = 0.009), but not in those not using oral contraceptives (P = 0.094). Maximum growth hormone values were reached at the end of the hypoglycaemic plateau, with significantly higher concentrations in the group using oral contraceptives than in the group not using oral contraceptives (P = 0.016).Conclusion  Healthy women on oral contraceptive treatment display an increased responsiveness of growth hormone to hypoglycaemic, as well as hyperglycaemic conditions and generally higher serum growth hormone concentrations than women without oral contraceptives. Given the known boosting effects of growth hormone on hypoglycaemic hormonal counter‐regulation, oral contraceptives may thus be a pharmacological candidate contributing to combat hypoglycaemia unawareness in women with diabetes in the future.