Jeroen Bosch Hospital

Objectives: (1) To describe ACPT implementation frequency in practice. (2) To assess associations of ACPT documentation with a) hospital care consumption, including systemic anti-tumor treatment in the last month(s) of life, and b) match between preferred and actual place of death, among oncology patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed. Data concerning ACPT documentation, hospital care consumption, and preferred and actual place of death were extracted from electronic patient records. Patients with completely documented ACPT (cACPT) and no ACPT were compared using multivariable logistic regression analyses. Results: ACPT was implemented in 64.5% (n = 793) of all deceased patients (n = 1230). In 17.6% (n = 216), preferred place of care or death was documented at least three months before death (cACPT). A cACPT was not associated with systemic anti-tumor treatment (Adjusted OR (AOR): 0.976; 95% CI: 0.642-1.483), but patients with cACPT had fewer diagnostic tests (AOR: 0.518; CI: 0.298-0.903) and less contacts with hospital disciplines (AOR: 0.545; CI: 0.338-0.877). In patients with cACPT, a match between preferred and actual place of death was found for 83% of the patients for whom the relevant information was available (n = 117/n = 141). In patients without ACPT, this information was mostly missing. Conclusion: Although the ACPT was implemented in two thirds of patients, timely documentation of preferred place of care or death is often missing. Yet, timely documentation of these preferences may promote out-hospital-death and save hospital care consumption.

In endometrial cancer (EC), preoperative anaemia, thrombocytosis and leucocytosis appear to be associated with worse prognosis. It remains unclear whether these parameters solely reflect tumour aggressiveness, or also impact response to adjuvant treatment. Therefore, our primary aim is to evaluate the prognostic relevance of anaemia, thrombocytosis and leucocytosis on survival in EC. Secondary, to explore their predictive relevance in response to radiotherapy in EC.

A retrospective multicentre cohort study was performed within 10 hospitals. Preoperative haematological parameters were defined as: Anaemia - haemoglobin <7.45 mmol/L (<12 g/Dl), thrombocytosis - platelets >400 × 10⁹ platelets/L, leucocytosis - leukocytes >10 × 10⁹/L. The relationship of haematological parameters with clinicopathological characteristics, ESGO/ESTRO/ESP risk groups and survival were evaluated. Furthermore, the predictive value of haematological parameters was determined on the overall response to adjuvant radiotherapy and for the ESGO/ESTRO/ESP intermediate-risk group solely receiving radiotherapy.

A total of 894 patients were included with a median follow-up of 4.5 years. Anaemia was present in 103 (11.5%), thrombocytosis in 79 (8.8%) and leucocytosis in 114 (12.7%) patients. The presence of anaemia or thrombocytosis was significantly associated with ESGO/ESTRO/ESP high-risk (respectively, P = 0.002 and P = 0.041). In the entire cohort, anaemia remained independently associated with decreased disease-specific survival (HR 2.31, 95% CI (1.19-4.50), P = 0.013) after adjusting for age, the abnormal haematological parameters and ESGO/ESTRO/ESP risk groups. In patients that were treated with adjuvant radiotherapy (n = 239), anaemia was associated with significant reduced 5-year disease-specific and recurrence-free survival (P = 0.005 and P = 0.025, respectively). In ESGO/ESTRO/ESP intermediate risk patients that received solely vaginal brachytherapy (n = 74), anaemia was associated with reduced disease-specific survival (P = 0.041).

Current data demonstrate the importance of preoperative anaemia as independent prognostic factor in patients with EC. Moreover, anaemia seems to be associated with reduced response to radiotherapy. Prospective validation in a larger study cohort is needed to verify anaemia as predictive biomarker for radiotherapy.What is already known on this subject? In endometrial cancer, preoperative abnormal haematological parameters like, anaemia, thrombocytosis and leucocytosis appears to be associated with FIGO advanced-stage and unfavourable outcome.What do the results of this study add? It remains unclear whether anaemia, thrombocytosis or leucocytosis solely reflecting worse prognosis by advanced tumour stage, or also impact response to adjuvant treatment. Current data demonstrate that anaemia is independent associated with decreased disease-specific survival and anaemia seems related with reduced response to radiotherapy and in specific to vaginal brachytherapy in ESGO/ESTRO/ESP intermediate risk patients.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Specific applied adjuvant treatment is needed if patients with anaemia have a reduced response to radiotherapy in EC. Prospective validation in a larger study cohort is required to verify anaemia as predictive biomarker for radiotherapy and to further evaluate the prognostic/predictive impact of anaemia in addition to the molecular subgroups.

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with endocrine therapy improve the outcomes of patients with hormone-receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer and can be used early as first-line treatment or deferred to second-line treatment^1-7. Randomized data comparing the use of CDK4/6i in the first- and second-line setting are lacking. The phase 3 SONIA trial (NCT03425838) randomized 1,050 patients who had not received previous therapy for advanced breast cancer to receive CDK4/6i in the first- or second-line setting⁸. All of the patients received the same endocrine therapy, consisting of an aromatase inhibitor for first-line treatment and fulvestrant for second-line treatment. The primary end point was defined as the time from randomization to disease progression after second-line treatment (progression-free survival 2 (PFS2)). We observed no statistically significant benefit for the use of CDK4/6i as a first-line compared with second-line treatment (median, 31.0 versus 26.8 months, respectively; hazard ratio = 0.87; 95% confidence interval = 0.74-1.03; P = 0.10). The health-related quality of life was similar in both groups. First-line CDK4/6i use was associated with a longer CDK4/6i treatment duration compared with second-line use (median CDK4/6i treatment duration of 24.6 versus 8.1 months, respectively) and more grade ≥3 adverse events (2,763 versus 1,591, respectively). These data challenge the need for first-line use of a CDK4/6i in all patients.