Article
Author: Samadi, Nazanin ; Kim, Yohan ; Baudar, Justine ; Laakmann, Katrin ; Badimon, Lina ; Wahlund, Casper ; Nybo, Jette ; Thaler, Johannes ; Benedikter, Birke ; Beckmann, Lennart ; Osterud, Bjarne ; Abdili, Evelyne ; Radu, Claudia M ; Sachetto, Ana Teresa Azevedo ; Orbe, Josune ; Aharon, Anat ; Gray, Elaine ; Camera, Marina ; Latysheva, Nadezhda ; Norris, Philip ; Bolis, Sara ; Mackman, Nigel ; Mullier, François ; Ettelaie, Camille ; Guldenpfennig, Maite ; Franco, Corentin ; Paramo, Jose A ; Snir, Omri ; Bonifay, Amandine ; Dignat-George, Françoise ; Brambilla, Marta ; de Menezes, Erika Marques ; Faille, Dorothée ; Bouriche, Tarik ; Lacroix, Romaric ; Campello, Elena ; Nieuwland, Rienk ; Suades, Rosa ; Martinod, Kimberly ; Hau, Chi ; Featherby, Sophie ; Hansen, John-Bjarne ; Lucien, Fabrice ; Hisada, Yohei ; Hogwood, John ; Chareyre, Corinne ; Barile, Lucio ; Judicone, Coralie ; Burrello, Jacopo ; Kristensen, Soren Risom ; Langer, Florian ; Roncal, Carmen
BACKGROUND:Scientific and clinical interest in extracellular vesicles (EVs) is growing. EVs that expose tissue factor (TF) bind factor VII/VIIa and can trigger coagulation. Highly procoagulant TF-exposing EVs are detectable in the circulation in various diseases, such as sepsis, COVID-19, or cancer. Many in-house and commercially available assays have been developed to measure EV-TF activity and antigen, but only a few studies have compared some of these assays.
OBJECTIVES:The International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardization Committee Subcommittee on Vascular Biology initiated a multicenter study to compare the sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of these assays.
METHODS:Platelet-depleted plasma samples were prepared from blood of healthy donors. The plasma samples were spiked either with EVs from human milk or EVs from TF-positive and TF-negative cell lines. Plasma was also prepared from whole human blood with or without lipopolysaccharide stimulation. Twenty-one laboratories measured EV-TF activity and antigen in the prepared samples using their own assays representing 18 functional and 9 antigenic assays.
RESULTS:There was a large variability in the absolute values for the different EV-TF activity and antigen assays. Activity assays had higher specificity and sensitivity compared with antigen assays. In addition, there was a large intra-assay and interassay variability. Functional assays that used a blocking anti-TF antibody or immunocapture were the most specific and sensitive. Activity assays that used immunocapture had a lower coefficient of variation compared with assays that isolated EVs by high-speed centrifugation.
CONCLUSION:Based on this multicenter study, we recommend measuring EV-TF using a functional assay in the presence of an anti-TF antibody.