BACKGROUND:The use of electronic cigarettes has increased markedly over the past decade, particularly among young adults, representing a growing public health concern. Pharmacological interventions for the cessation of vaping are thus limited. This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of varenicline compared with that of placebo in vaping cessation.
METHODS:A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted following the Cochrane Collaboration and PRISMA guidelines. The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched until April 2025. The outcomes included continuous abstinence, seven-day point prevalence abstinence at the end of treatment and follow-up, and adverse events, including nausea and vivid dreams.
RESULTS:Three RCTs comprising 355 participants were included. Varenicline significantly increased seven-day point-prevalence abstinence at the end of treatment (RR, 2.30; 95 % CI, 1.64-3.24) and at follow-up (RR, 2.14; 95 % CI, 1.47-3.10) and improved continuous abstinence rates (RR, 2.71; 95 % CI, 1.48-4.99). The overall incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between the groups (RR: 1.49; 95 % CI: 0.68-3.25). However, nausea (RR: 2.35; 95 % CI 1.77-3.13) and vivid dreams (RR: 2.56; 95 % CI 1.59-4.11) were more frequent among patients receiving varenicline treatment CONCLUSION: Varenicline improved vaping cessation rates compared to placebo and was generally well tolerated, despite a higher incidence of nausea and vivid dreams.