Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust

A chronic total occlusion (CTO) is present in 15-20% of patients who are referred for invasive coronary angiography. CTO Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) procedure success rates have increased over the years and can be as high as 90% when performed by high-volume CTO operators.Procedurally, excess calcification in the CTO anatomy is one factor which makes it difficult to complete the procedure or obtain ideal stent expansion. Excess calcification is best identified by Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography (CTCA) rather than invasive angiography.
The investigators plan to retrospectively evaluate CTCA in patients who underwent CTO PCI and correlate calcification characteristics with CTO PCI outcomes and tools utilised for calcium modification.

Atrophic gastritis where the cells of the stomach lining change is the single most important precursor condition for gastric cancer. Helicobacter pylori a bacteria which causes infection in the stomach is the most important causative agent of inflammation of the stomach, and subsequent atrophic gastritis.
The difficulty with diagnosing patients with gastric cancer is that a lot of patients will suffer from heartburn and pain around the stomach, but very few of those will have gastric cancer. This makes it difficult for GPs to know who to refer for further testing as the current cancer referral criteria are very broad.
To reduce the need for invasive diagnostic methods such as endoscopy where a flexible tube with camera is inserted into the gullet and stomach via the mouth, a commercially available blood test (GastroPanel ®) designed to measure the levels of certain key stomach hormones to detect atrophic gastritis has been developed. It is extremely rare for gastric cancer to develop without there first being gastric atrophy.
A real word study is needed assess the performance of this blood test in a group of patients referred via an urgent cancer pathway for endoscopy in the UK. Scoring systems have been created to help us triage referrals to endoscopy in those with difficulty swallowing, but no similar score is available for those presenting with other upper abdominal symptoms. By using this blood test as well as collecting patient information we hope to create an improved referral criteria for those needing investigation for gastric cancer.

The goal of this observational cohort study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy and cost effectiveness of Risk of Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) compared with CA125 in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer in patients attending their general practitioner (GP) with symptoms that sometimes might indicate ovarian cancer. The main questions it aims to answer are: • what is the accuracy of the ROMA algorithm which uses the blood tests CA125 and Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) compared to CA125 in diagnosing ovarian cancer, particularly early-stage ovarian cancer, in women tested for suspected ovarian cancer from primary care? • What is the cost-effectiveness of ROMA versus CA125 testing in primary care to diagnose ovarian cancer? When a participant's GP orders a CA125 blood test, the blood will also be tested for HE4 and the ROMA algorithm calculated. The diagnostic accuracy of ROMA and CA125 will be compared to see if ROMA would be a better diagnostic test for ovarian cancer when used in the primary care setting.