Article
Author: Boersma, Lucas V.A. ; Mittal, Suneet ; Philbert, Berit T. ; Kooiman, Kirsten M. ; Borger van der Burg, Alida E. ; van Opstal, Jurren M. ; Lambiase, Pier D. ; Bracke, Frank A.L.E. ; Behr, Elijah R. ; Kuschyk, Juergen ; de Groot, Joris R. ; Surber, Ralf ; Kääb, Stefan ; Ghani, Abdul ; Nemirovksy, Dmitry ; de Weger, Anouk ; Neuzil, Petr ; Bijsterveld, Nick R. ; Pepplinkhuizen, Shari ; Chicos, Alexandru B. ; Knaut, Michael ; Dizon, Jose M. ; Smeding, Lonneke ; Jansen, Ward P.J. ; Olde Nordkamp, Louise R.A. ; Nordbeck, Peter ; El Chami, Mikhael F. ; Burke, Martin C. ; Alings, Marco ; Whinnett, Zachary I. ; Brouwer, Marc A. ; Knops, Reinoud E. ; Upadhyay, Gaurav A. ; Richter, Sergio ; de Jong, Jonas S.S.G. ; Brouwer, Tom F. ; Quast, Anne-Floor B.E. ; Vernooy, Kevin ; Betts, Timothy R. ; Wilde, Arthur A.M. ; Wright, David J. ; de Veld, Jolien A. ; van der Stuijt, Willeke ; Allaart, Cornelis P. ; Bonnemeier, Hendrik ; Miller, Marc A. ; Tijssen, Jan G.P.
BACKGROUND::The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) was developed to overcome the risk of lead-related complications associated with the transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (TV-ICD). In contrast to the TV-ICD, the S-ICD is a completely extrathoracic device. Subsequently, complications differ between these 2 implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, which might impact patient perceptions of the therapies. This prespecified secondary analysis of the PRAETORIAN trial evaluates differences in quality of life.
METHODS::
The PRAETORIAN trial (A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Subcutaneous and Transvenous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy) randomized patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator indication, without the need for pacing to S-ICD or TV-ICD therapy. Two questionnaires were collected at baseline, discharge, 12 months, and 30 months. The Duke Activity Status Index measures cardiac-specific physical functioning, and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey measures physical and mental well-being, with the subscales bodily pain and mental health being of interest in this analysis. Mann-Whitney
U
tests were used to compare study arms, and a mixed model was used to describe the questionnaire outcomes over time.
RESULTS::
Patients were randomized to S-ICD (n=426) and TV-ICD (n=423). In the S-ICD group, 20% were women versus 19% in the TV-ICD group. The median age was 63 (interquartile range, 54–69) years in the S-ICD group versus 64 (interquartile range, 56–69) years in the TV-ICD group. There were no significant differences in the Duke Activity Status Index and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey subscales for bodily pain and mental health between the groups at any time point. Patients with a shock in the last 90 days had significantly lower scores for social functioning (
P
=0.008) and role limitations due to emotional problems (
P
=0.001) than patients without a shock, but this effect did not differ between treatment arms.
CONCLUSIONS::In a large randomized cohort of patients with an S-ICD or TV-ICD, no difference in overall quality of life was observed. However, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks resulted in a reduction in quality of life, regardless of the device type or appropriateness.
REGISTRATION::
URL:
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov
; Unique identifier: NCT01296022.