Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the audiological
performance of the ADHEAR system and to compare it with a softband BAHA
system in adults with middle ear disease. Study Design: Prospective,
single-subject, repeated-measures study Setting: Monocentric study
Participants: In 23 patients with mild to moderate isolated conductive
or combined hearing loss (CHL) the ADHEAR system was tested, where 12 of
them were outside of the ADHEAR indication. In ten patients, testing was
performed with the ADHEAR system and a softband BAHA system. A control
group consisted of 10 patients with bilateral artificial occluded ear
canal. Main outcome measures: Air and bone conduction thresholds and
free-field monosyllable speech intelligibility thresholds in quiet and
in noise were measured and evaluated in an unaided situation and aided
situation. Furthermore, an ADHEAR questionnaire was assessed. Results:
In patients with a middle ear disease compared to the unaided situation,
the aided situations with the ADHEAR system and the softband BAHA system
led to a significant improvement of speech intelligibility in quiet and
in noise. In terms of the ADHEAR questionnaire, using the ADHEAR system
patients reported about an improvement in sound localization, sound
quality and speech intelligibility. Conclusions: The results show that
patients with middle ear disease can benefit from the ADHEAR system,
even if their hearing loss is outside of its indication. Outside the
indication criteria of the ADHEAR system, it can be an option.