Laboratorios Senosiain SA de CV

Antimicrobial prophylaxis in urological procedures is aimed to reduce the risk of local and systemic postoperative infections such as urinary tract infection or surgical site infection. It should be recommended only when the potential benefit exceeds the anticipated risks and costs. However, a wide variation in the use of periprocedural prophylactic antibiotics has been demonstrated, which frequently is incurred as an inappropriate selection of antimicrobials, inadequate schedule of administration or excessive duration of prophylaxis.
The increase in multidrug resistance of antibiotics in recent decades has been associated with its misuse, resulting in an increased rate of morbidity and mortality, prolonged hospital stays and increased care costs. Specifically, resistance to fluoroquinolones has increased its prevalence, a group of antibiotics widely used in urology. Therefore, local resistance patterns should be considered before following recommendations, especially in populations with poor control of antimicrobial use.
Transurethral resection of bladder (TURB) has become a frequent surgical procedure, as it is the main diagnostic and therapeutic tool for bladder cancer, representing the ninth most common malignancy in the world. However, no recent randomized clinical trial has investigated antimicrobial prophylaxis for TURB. It is well known that an expected complication of TURB is urinary tract infection (UTI), which is the most common healthcare related infection worldwide.
Under this premise, a randomized clinical trial is proposed to analyze the current panorama of UTI as a transcendent postoperative complication of TURB, under the context of the new emerging resistance parameters. The use of fosfomycin trometamol is proposed as a good potential option for urological procedures due to its high activity against multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria and its favorable pharmacokinetic parameters that guarantees wide tissue penetration and a high urinary concentration, in a single dose, the which will be compared with the control group with traditional prophylaxis (amikacin). The relative risk of UTI will be estimated, as well as the attributable risk of the main risk factors associated with this infection, allowing a better characterization of this population for adequate decision making regarding this clinical challenge.

A clinical controlled, randomized and double blind trial that included adult patients (≥18 years) receiving kidney transplantation (KT) at the INCMNSZ.
The intervention group will receive disodium fosfomycin 4 g intravenously in three moments: preoperative of transplant surgery, prior to removal of the urinary catheter and finally prior to removal of ureteral catheter. The control group will receive placebo in the same moments.
Both groups will receive prophylaxis standard for urinary tract infection (UTI), with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 160/800 mg per day. This prophylaxis will be administered once the estimated glomerular filtration rate is greater than 30 mL/min/1.73m2.
The primary objective is to compare the average number of episodes of UTI´s and asymptomatic bacteriuria in both groups after 7 weeks of follow-up. The secondary objectives are to know the incidence of asymptomatic bacteriuria, the incidence of hospitalizations for IVU, the days of hospital stay, the pattern of bacterial resistance, the safety of disodium fosfomycin, and assessment of the function of the graft and rejection rate.

Randomized controlled trial in 80 children with mild to persistent moderate asthma, who were randomized to receive montelukast 5mg + loratadine 5mg vs. montelukast 5mg + placebo for loratadine to evaluate the efficacy in terms of improvement of symptoms. Secondary outcome was the days off without the use of rescue medication; reduction of levels of cysteinyl leukotrienes (Cys-LTS), nitric oxide (FeNO), intracellular adhesion molecule type 1 (ICAM-1) and interleukin 8 (IL-8) in condensed exhaled air; the improvement of day and night symptoms; the reduction in the frequency of night awakenings; the improvement in the quality of life; the percentage of related adverse events; the need to use systemic steroids; the number of visits to the emergency department secondary to the presence of an asthma attack; the number of hospitalizations secondary to asthma attacks; and the improvement in the percentage of FEV1 in relation to the predicted.