DJO UK Ltd.

DJO UK Ltd (ENOVIS) is conducting this study to confirm the performance and safety of the Chattanooga Intelect® devices in real world use. This study will record post market clinical data on the use of a number of MDR-CE marked devices that are part of the Chattanooga Intelect® device family to ensure the continued acceptability of the benefit-risk ratio, and to identify possible systematic misuse or off-label use of the devices (Intelect® Mobile 2 Combo, Intelect® Mobile 2 Ultrasound, Intelect® Mobile 2 Electrotherapy (Stim), Intelect® Transport 2 Combo and Intelect® Transport 2 Ultrasound).

DJO UK Ltd (ENOVIS) is conducting this study to assess the effectiveness of LightForce® Therapy Lasers on pain reduction in subjects with ankle soft tissue trauma and/or sport injury. In detail this study will assess superiority of LightForce® Therapy Lasers combined with standard of care, represented by RICE and physiotherapy/exercise program, compared to sham laser combined with standard of care (RICE and physiotherapy/exercise program) on pain reduction in subjects with acute grade I - II lateral ankle sprain. In addition, this study allows to collect post market clinical data on the safety and performance of LightForce® Therapy Lasers, when used, following the normal clinical practice, in accordance with its approved and CE marked intended use.

A Post-Market Prospective Clinical Investigation to collect PMCF data on the safety and performance of the Cefar URO device when using the preset program P4 (parameter setting: frequency 20Hz, pulse width 200μs) for the symptomatic treatment of urge incontinence in adults with overactive bladder in accordance with the approved labelling.
The Cefar URO device features four pre-set programs (P1, P2, P3 and P4) and three custom programs. Although supporting data on the preset programs P1, P2, P3 are available for the clinically equivalent UROstim2 device, program P4 is unique to Cefar URO. Program P4 utilizes the parameters 20Hz and 200μs which are commonly reported in the literature for the stated indications but for which no data is available for the clinically equivalent UROstim2 device. The present study is therefore aimed to cover this data gap.