CHICAGO —
Over the years, a handful of cities have tried catching up to the flourishing biotech hubs in Boston or the San Francisco Bay Area. Chicago, the third-largest city in the US, is putting together its best attempt.
The growth in the Chicago-area biotech landscape is due to several reasons, including better collaboration between local research institutions, the opening of the Chan Zuckerberg Biohub last year, new incubators and brand-new lab space.
“We don’t want to just compete with traditional biotech hubs,” said John Conrad, CEO of the Illinois Biotechnology Innovation Organization. “We’re really focused on redefining what a biotech ecosystem can be in the city of Chicago.”
The city ranked 10th in the US for biopharma R&D employment in 2023, with 13,080 jobs, according to a
report
from real estate firm CBRE. But it punched above its weight in biopharma manufacturing roles, ranking third nationally with 60,320 workers.
“People use the word ‘boom.’ I don’t like those types of hyperbolic statements,” said John Flavin, CEO of a biotech incubator called Portal Innovations. “If you look at the data, it would support steady growth, and I see that continuing in Chicago.”
Portal, which is home to about 50 startups in Chicago that employ approximately 250 people, hosts quarterly meetings with venture capital firms that assess its startups. A year and a half ago, there wasn’t as much interest from investors, Flavin said.
“It’s very tenacious greenshoots,” said Michelle Hoffmann, executive director of the Chicago Biomedical Consortium. She moved to Chicago in 2019 after spending 17 years working in Boston’s biotech ecosystem. “Here what you’re seeing is an amazing effort to bootstrap.”
Industry leaders who spoke with
Endpoints News
pointed to a variety of factors driving Chicago’s biotech growth. The city recently
ranked 10th
on
R&D World
’s top 10 US biopharma hubs list based on patent filings, NIH funding and real estate metrics.
Chicago has 8.2 million square feet of occupied and vacant space for life sciences companies, according to a Cushman & Wakefield
report
in February. That’s well short of Boston’s 44.5 million square feet, but similar in size to Los Angeles (8.6 million), Seattle (9.8 million) and Raleigh-Durham (12.2 million).
“Over the last 24 months, we’ve seen a huge shift and now there’s actually available space,” said Max Zwolan, a VP at JLL who mainly focuses on life sciences.
At about 700,000 square feet, last year was Chicago’s best year in terms of leasing for R&D, manufacturing and other biotech space, according to Zwolan. In recent years, developers have constructed new labs that help retain local entrepreneurs and their startups who would have picked up their research and headed to the coasts a few years ago.
Coupled with the new lab space is an influx of attention on local biomedical research after the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative opened its Chicago biohub last year. Local leaders say the biohub has elevated the collaborative spirit with the region’s universities, which include Northwestern University, the University of Chicago and University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.
“At the biohub, we’re off to a really strong start, and I think that’s a testament to the talent pool that we have here in Chicago, as well as our ability to recruit from the coasts,” said Shana Kelley, president of CZ Biohub Chicago.
The biohub, which currently has a team of 30 people, plans to double in size next year.
“Everyone in the community here knows that we have all the necessary ingredients,” Kelley said.
The biohub shares a building with Flavin’s Portal Innovations. It’s one of multiple incubators and accelerators trying to foster new biotechs. There’s Fulton Labs in the West Loop, Illinois Science + Technology Park (ISTP) in suburban Skokie, and Chicago Technology Park (CTP) at the University of Illinois Chicago, among others. ISTP has housed companies like COUR Pharmaceuticals, which raised
$105 million in January
, while CTP is home to
CellTrans
, which received FDA approval last year for a diabetes islet cell therapy.
“When I started Vanqua, yes, we had the opportunity to go to either of the coasts,” Vanqua Bio CEO Jim Sullivan said. The company’s research came out of a local Northwestern University lab, and it’s now located at Fulton Labs. “That was absolutely a discussion with investors at the time, but there was a real desire to see: Can we build it in Chicago?”
Vanqua is one of multiple Chicago biotechs that have turned into clinical-stage companies in recent years. It
extended
its Series B by $45 million in July and
has produced
Phase 1 data for its experimental oral medicine for certain patients with Parkinson’s. COUR, meanwhile
,
has several drugs in development and inked a deal
with Roche’s Genentech
this month.
Alongside those successes is a belief that Chicago’s potential, in part, stems from a better quality of life than the coastal hubs. “The work-life balance and cost-efficiency of space is also fantastic,” said COUR CEO Dannielle Appelhans, a Chicago-area native.
“Most of the Midwest people who flock to those [coastal] cities don’t want to go,” said Joe Nolan, CEO of Jaguar Gene Therapy, a Deerfield-backed company that expects to enter the clinic early next year.
Insiders also say that because Chicago has fewer biotech startups, that means the turnover of scientists — perhaps the most crucial piece of a small biotech — is less of a fear for executives and investors. There is a small but influential set of big drugmakers based in the region, including AbbVie and Horizon, which has rebranded its massive building with Amgen insignia following its $28 billion takeover.
Ryan Clarke got a PhD from the University of Illinois Chicago and then moved to Boston to work at cell therapy company Sana Biotechnology. He found the employee turnover frustrating and moved home to Chicago during the pandemic to create his own cell therapy startup based on his PhD research. It’s called Syntax Bio, and it recently closed the first part of its Series A.
“It was like a revolving door at a lot of well-capitalized startups. That was a scary thing to see, because a lot of people would just get acclimated with a project and then they’d be looking around for what would be the next best thing down the street,” Clarke said. “In Chicago, that was definitely not going to be the case.”