Between 0.6% and 22.2% of the global adult male population has a sexual interest in children (SIIC), depending on evaluation methods [1]. SIIC constitutes a major risk factor for child sexual abuse (CSA) and viewing of child sexual abuse material (CSAM) [2]. The true rates of CSA offences cannot be estimated, but self-report studies find 30 times higher rates of child-reported CSA compared to reports from child protection services or police [3].
Engagement in therapy is a protective factor against the risk of child sexual abuse [4] and can lead to reductions in CSAM consumption and severity [5]. Anticipated negative therapist behaviour is associated with less willingness to seek treatment [6]. The fear of being reported by the therapist discourages participation in therapy [7], a concern complicated by mandatory reporting laws in some countries [8]. Negative attitudes towards ISIC are high, and SIIC may be the most stigmatised trait globally [9].
Identifying barriers to treatment for ISIC, and of measures to overcome them, is important to increase therapy engagement, with the goal to improve wellbeing, reduce CSAM consumption, and reduce the risk of CSA offences. Patient anonymity during therapy may play an important role in increasing disclosure of stigmatised traits [10,11]. It remains unclear whether anonymous therapy addresses patient treatment anxieties and therefore increases the comfort or willingness to engage in therapy. To address this research gap, we conduct an anonymous online survey with ISIC to answer the following questions:
RQ1. Can online therapy preferences be identified for minor-attacted individuals and for their therapists?
RQ2. Are there individual factors that predict stigmatized individuals' online therapy preferences? (E.g. Trust, Self-Stigma)
RQ3. Are there differences between the different stigmatized groups', therapists, and general populations' online therapy preferences?
1. Savoie V, Quayle E, Flynn E. Prevalence and correlates of individuals with sexual interest in children: A systematic review. Child Abuse Negl. 2021 May;115:105005.
2. Beier KM, Grundmann D, Kuhle LF, Scherner G, Konrad A, Amelung T. The German Dunkelfeld Project: A Pilot Study to Prevent Child Sexual Abuse and the Use of Child Abusive Images. J Sex Med. 2015 Feb 1;12(2):529-42.
3. Stoltenborgh M, van IJzendoorn MH, Euser EM, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ. A Global Perspective on Child Sexual Abuse: Meta-Analysis of Prevalence Around the World. Child Maltreat. 2011 May 1;16(2):79-101.
4. Van Deinse TB, Cuddeback GS, Wilson AB, Edwards D, Lambert M. Variation in Criminogenic Risks by Mental Health Symptom Severity: Implications for Mental Health Services and Research. Psychiatr Q. 2021 Mar;92(1):73-84.
5. Schuler M, Gieseler H, Schweder KW, Heyden M von, Beier KM. Characteristics of the Users of Troubled Desire, a Web-Based Self-management App for Individuals With Sexual Interest in Children: Descriptive Analysis of Self-assessment Data. JMIR Mental Health. 2021 Feb 19;8(2):e22277.
6. Jahnke S, McPhail IV, Antfolk J. Stigma processes, psychological distress, and attitudes toward seeking treatment among pedohebephilic people. PLoS One. 2024;19(10):e0312382.
7. Grady MD, Levenson JS, Mesias G, Kavanagh S, Charles J. "I can't talk about that": Stigma and fear as barriers to preventive services for minor-attracted persons. Stigma and Health. 2019;4(4):400-10.
8. Edwards W, Hensley C. Contextualizing Sex Offender Management Legislation and Policy: Evaluating the Problem of Latent Consequences in Community Notification Laws. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2001 Feb 1;45(1):83-101.
9. Jahnke S, Imhoff R, Hoyer J. Stigmatization of People with Pedophilia: Two Comparative Surveys. Arch Sex Behav. 2015 Jan 1;44(1):21-34.
10. Fear NT, Seddon R, Jones N, Greenberg N, Wessely S. Does anonymity increase the reporting of mental health symptoms? BMC Public Health. 2012 Sept 17;12(1):797.