Article
Author: Hylton, Nola ; Boughey, Judy ; Sanft, Tara ; Basu, Amrita ; Clark, Amy ; Northfelt, Donald ; Nanda, Rita ; Soliman, Hatem ; Stringer-Reasor, Erica ; Esserman, Laura ; Albain, Kathy ; Shatsky, Rebecca ; Melisko, Michelle ; Ellis, Erin ; Lo, Shelley ; Lang, Julie ; Blaes, Anne ; Arora, Mili ; Barcaru, Andrei ; van ‘t Veer, Laura ; Wolf, Denise M. ; Mayer, Ingrid ; Mukhtar, Rita ; Han, Hyo ; Yau, Christina ; Robinson, Patricia ; Viscusi, Rebecca ; Magbanua, Mark ; Beckwith, Heather ; Glas, Annuska ; Isaacs, Claudine ; DeMichele, Angela ; Olopade, Funmi ; Brown-Swigart, Lamorna ; Lu, Janice ; Haddad, Tufia ; Mitri, Zahi ; Hershman, Dawn ; Chien, Jo ; Meisel, Jane ; Delson, Amy ; Haley, Barbara ; Mittempergher, Lorenza ; Huppert, Laura ; Rugo, Hope ; Murthy, Rashmi ; Khan, Qamar ; Williams, Nicole ; Kuilman, Midas ; Hirst, Gillian ; Potter, David ; Thomas, Alexandra ; Trivedi, Meghna ; Yung, Rachel ; Vaklavas, Christos ; Sanford, Amy ; Kemmer, Kathleen ; Pohlmann, Paula ; Sayaman, Rosalyn ; Edmiston, Kirsten K. ; Symmans, W. Fraser ; Pusztai, Lajos ; Elias, Anthony ; Liu, Minetta ; Petricoin, Emmanuel F. ; Kalinsky, Kevin ; Falkson, Carla ; Perlmutter, Jane ; Yee, Douglas ; Yeung, Kay ; Borowsky, Alexander ; Campbell, Michael ; Wallace, Anne
PURPOSE:Neoadjuvant immunotherapy (IO) has become the standard of care for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), but not yet for other subtypes. We previously developed a clinical-grade mRNA-based immune classifier (ImPrint) predicting response to IO that is now being used in I-SPY2.2 as part of the response predictive subtypes. We report the performance of ImPrint in hormone receptor–positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HR+HER2–) patients from five IO arms.
METHODS:A total of 204 HR+HER2– (MammaPrint high-risk) patients from five IO arms (anti–PD-1, anti–PD-L1/poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase inhibitor combination, anti–PD-1/toll-like receptor 9 dual-IO combination, and anti–PD-1 ± lymphocyte activation gene 3 dual-IO combination) and 191 patients from the chemotherapy-only control arm were included in this analysis. Patients were classified as ImPrint+ (likely sensitive) versus ImPrint– (likely resistant), using pretreatment mRNA. Performance of ImPrint for predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) to IO-containing arms was characterized and compared with tumor grade (III), MammaPrint (ultra) High2 risk (MP2), and estrogen receptor (ER)-low (ER ≤ 10%).
RESULTS:Overall, the pCR rate across the five IO arms was 33%. 26% of HR+HER2– patients were ImPrint+, and pCR rates with IO were 75% in ImPrint+ versus 17% in ImPrint–, with the highest pCR rate >90% in a dual-IO arm. In the control arm, pCR rates were 33% in ImPrint+ and 8% in ImPrint–. Tumor grade (III), MP2, and ER-low showed pCR rates in IO of 45%, 56%, and 63%, respectively, with lower pCR odds ratios (OR < 7.5) compared with ImPrint (OR = 14.5).
CONCLUSION:Using an accurate selection strategy, HR+HER2– patients could achieve pCR rates similar to what is seen with best neoadjuvant therapies in TNBC and HER2+ (ie, pCR rate >65%-70%). ImPrint, an Food and Drug Administration IDE-enabled assay, may represent a way to identify HR+HER2– patients for IO that best balances likely benefit versus risk of serious immune-related adverse events.