Lafutidine

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) has a significant impact on the therapeutic efficacy of chemotherapy and patients' quality of life. The aim of this study was to assess the preventive effect of lafutidine on CIPN.

Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy with lafutidine 10 mg twice daily (lafutidine group) or without lafutidine (control group). Peripheral neuropathy in both groups was assessed with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 and two patient-based questionnaires, the Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (PNQ) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-Ntx). The primary outcome was the incidence of grade 2 or higher peripheral neuropathy in CTCAE version 5.0. The target number of cases was set at approximately 40.

In total, 18 patients were screened, and 16 patients were assigned to the lafutidine group (n=9) or control group (n=7) between January 2021 and January 2023. Due to poor recruitment, the target number of cases was not reached. Grade 2 or higher neuralgia was 22.2% in the lafutidine group and 14.3% in the control group. Grade 2 or higher peripheral sensory neuropathy was 100% in the lafutidine group and 71.4% in the control group (P=0.175). Grade 3 or higher peripheral neuropathy was not detected in either group. There was no significant difference in PNQ scores between the two groups. Median FACT/GOG-Ntx scores after the fourth cycle tended to be lower in the lafutidine group than in the control group. There was no statistically significant difference in progression free survival (PFS) between the two groups. There were no adverse events due to lafutidine administration.

Although the preventive effect of lafutidine on CIPN could not be demonstrated statistically, lafutidine FACT/GOG-Ntx scores showed a trend toward decreased neurotoxicity as chemotherapy proceeded. More reliable studies using lafutidine on the prevention of CIPN should be conducted.

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, identifier: jRCTs021200031.

Ranitidine, the most widely used histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA), was withdrawn because of N-nitrosodimethylamine impurity in 2020. Given the worldwide exposure to this drug, the potential risk of cancer development associated with the intake of known carcinogens is an important epidemiological concern.

To examine the comparative risk of cancer associated with the use of ranitidine vs other H2RAs.

This new-user active comparator international network cohort study was conducted using 3 health claims and 9 electronic health record databases from the US, the United Kingdom, Germany, Spain, France, South Korea, and Taiwan. Large-scale propensity score (PS) matching was used to minimize confounding of the observed covariates with negative control outcomes. Empirical calibration was performed to account for unobserved confounding. All databases were mapped to a common data model. Database-specific estimates were combined using random-effects meta-analysis. Participants included individuals aged at least 20 years with no history of cancer who used H2RAs for more than 30 days from January 1986 to December 2020, with a 1-year washout period. Data were analyzed from April to September 2021.

The main exposure was use of ranitidine vs other H2RAs (famotidine, lafutidine, nizatidine, and roxatidine).

The primary outcome was incidence of any cancer, except nonmelanoma skin cancer. Secondary outcomes included all cancer except thyroid cancer, 16 cancer subtypes, and all-cause mortality.

Among 1 183 999 individuals in 11 databases, 909 168 individuals (mean age, 56.1 years; 507 316 [55.8%] women) were identified as new users of ranitidine, and 274 831 individuals (mean age, 58.0 years; 145 935 [53.1%] women) were identified as new users of other H2RAs. Crude incidence rates of cancer were 14.30 events per 1000 person-years (PYs) in ranitidine users and 15.03 events per 1000 PYs among other H2RA users. After PS matching, cancer risk was similar in ranitidine compared with other H2RA users (incidence, 15.92 events per 1000 PYs vs 15.65 events per 1000 PYs; calibrated meta-analytic hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.97-1.12). No significant associations were found between ranitidine use and any secondary outcomes after calibration.

In this cohort study, ranitidine use was not associated with an increased risk of cancer compared with the use of other H2RAs. Further research is needed on the long-term association of ranitidine with cancer development.