Rebamipide

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of joints. It is one of the major causes of disability and morbidity worldwide. Administration of conventional drugs through the systemic route restricts the bioavailability of drugs, systemic toxicity, and reduced efficacy. We have introduced Rebamipide (Reb)-loaded Sinapic acid (SA)-Pullulan (PL) nanomicelles (Reb@SA-PL NMs), a nanotechnology based drug delivery system for the treatment of inflammatory arthritis. PL is a polysaccharide obtained from the fungus Aureobasidium pullulans, and SA is a bioactive polyphenol found in various plants. Both are classified by US-FDA Generally Recognised as Safe (GRAS) materials. Reb@SA-PL NMs found to be cytocompatible. Subsequently, intra-articular administration of Reb@SA-PL NMs enhances the anti-arthritic potential compared to free Reb drug in collagen-induced experimental inflammatory arthritis rat model. Reb@SA-PL NMs reduced the expression of RANKL receptor and Nf-κB. Reb@SA-PL NMs reverses the breakdown of type II collagen, MMP-13, and inhibits the pro-inflammatory markers. Reb@SA-PL NMs prevented bone erosion, cartilage degradation, joint oedema, and synovial inflammation. The results of the study demonstrated that Reb@SA-PL NMs, an enzyme-responsive drug delivery system, has excellent potential for alleviating inflammatory arthritis by blocking MMP-13 and RANKL.

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between diclofenac sodium ophthalmic solution (DFNa) and corneal epithelial cell damage and to evaluate the preventive effect of rebamipide (RBM) on it. Methods: DFNa, DFNa/preservative-free (PF), or 0.5% chlorobutanol (CB) solution was instilled into the conjunctival sac of a normal rabbit eye, and corneal resistance measurement (using a corneal resistance device [CRD]) was performed 120 min after the end of instillation. Then, fluorescent staining (FL), corneal tissue staining (hematoxylin and eosin [H&E]), and immunostaining (zona occlusion-1) were performed (RBM-untreated group). However, RBM was instilled into the eyes of another group of normal rabbits, followed by each of the solutions; 120 min after the end of instillation, all evaluations were performed for this group (RBM treatment group). Results: Using the CRD method, in the RBM-untreated group, corneal resistance (CR; %) was found to be significantly reduced in DFNa (79.9 ± 19.4%), DFNa/PF (89.1 ± 17.3%), and 0.5% CB (83.8 ± 10.6%). In addition, DFNa and 0.5% CB solutions showed positive staining in the FL staining method. In the H&E staining method, some clear voids were observed in the outermost layer of the cornea using DFNa and 0.5% CB solutions. However, corneal epithelial damage was suppressed in the RBM treatment group. ZO-1 immunostaining in DFNa and 0.5% CB solutions revealed discontinuous localization of ZO-1 at the cell periphery. Conclusions: RBM eye drops were effective in preventing corneal epithelial damage caused by DFNa eye drops, and CB was considered to be the main causative agent of this damage.