Lidocaine/Prilocaine

Three to 4-weekly intramuscular injections of benzathine penicillin G (BPG) for a prolonged period (e.g., 10 years, until age 40 years, or lifelong) are recommended for preventing group A streptococcal infections that cause recurrent acute rheumatic fever (ARF) and potential progression to rheumatic heart disease (RHD). The duration of treatment, frequency and local pain associated with BPG injections may lead to reduced compliance. Shorter courses of BPG are recommended for the treatment of syphilis and Streptococcal infections. We aimed to assess the effects of local anaesthesia in reducing injection pain in patients who are being treated with BPG.

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science and LILACS from database inception up to May 4, 2024, and performed additional searches for grey literature. Randomised controlled trials comparing BPG vs. BPG administered alongside local anaesthetics were included. Randomized controlled trials using BPG, irrespectively of indication, and testing any local anaesthetic agent for pain alleviation were considered eligible. We applied GRADE to assess the quality of evidence. Summary data were extracted from included trials. The primary outcome was injection pain, assessed through mean differences. A random-effects model was utilized to account for study heterogeneity. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022342437.

Database searches identified a total of 3958 records, and 3 additional records were retrieved from grey literature searches. After removal of duplicates, screening of abstracts and full-text review, eight trials were included, combining a total of 489 patients (151 patients with RHD). Immediate pain level, as reported by patients, was of high intensity in most studies. Low intensity pain was still reported at 24 h. Administration of lidocaine mixed with BPG was associated with a significant reduction in immediate post-injection pain (mean difference -3.84, 95% confidence interval -6.19 to -1.48, P = 0.0001; 4 studies; I² = 98%; GRADE: moderate quality), pain at 5 min (mean difference -2.85, 95% CI confidence interval -3.78 to -1.92, P < 0.0001; 1 study; GRADE: moderate quality), and pain at 20 min (mean difference -1.85, 95% confidence interval -2.61 to -1.09, P < 0.0001; 1 study; GRADE: moderate quality) on a 1 to 10 scale. One study assessed lidocaine cream applied to the skin prior to BPG injection and showed no significant reduction in injection pain (mean difference = -0.54, 95% CI confidence interval -1.17 to 0.09, P = 0.13; 1 study; GRADE: low quality). Mepivacaine mixed with BPG in patients with syphilis showed a significant reduction of immediate post-injection pain (mean difference -2.19, 95% CI confidence interval -2.49 to -1.89, P < 0.0001; 1 study; GRADE: moderate quality). Two studies assessed procaine mixed with BPG and reported: lower immediate pain levels or pain assessed at 1 h (mean difference and 95% CI confidence intervals not provided, P = 0.001 and P = 0.008, respectively; 1 study; GRADE: low quality), or less immediate pain and pain at 24 h on the buttock injected with procaine mixed with BPG (mean difference and 95% CI confidence intervals not provided, P < 0.001 for both; 1 study; Grade: low quality). No severe adverse reactions were reported.

In patients receiving intramuscular BPG injections, moderate quality quantitative evidence suggests that BPG injections diluted with lidocaine or mepivacaine may improve post-injection pain scores compared to BPG injections diluted with sterile water. Procaine may also have a benefit, but quality of evidence was lower. Most studies included small patient samples and assessed pain levels at different timepoints. Due to insufficient data we were not able to assess the impact of injection volume, and local anaesthetics' dose on pain intensity and duration of pain relief.

WHO.

Totally implantable access port (TIAP) is a subcutaneously implanted, long-term infusion device that is widely used in oncology patients. However, multiple needle insertions into TIAP may lead to pain, anxiety, and dread in patients. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of Valsalva maneuver, eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) cream, and the combination of both in relieving pain of cannulations on TIAP.

This was a prospective randomized controlled study. We included 223 patients treated with antineoplastic drugs and randomized them into four groups: EMLA Group (Group E), control Group (Group C), Valsalva maneuver Group (Group V), and EMLA cream combing with Valsalva maneuver Group (Group EV). Each group was given the corresponding intervention before non-coring needle insertion. The data on pain scores and overall comfort were collected by numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) and visual analog scale (VAS).

Group E and Group EV experienced the least amount of pain scores in needle insertion, which was significantly lower than Group V and Group C ( p < 0.05). Meanwhile, Group E and Group EV obtained the highest comfort level, which was significantly higher than group C ( p < 0.05). Fifteen patients developed localized skin erythema after the application of medical Vaseline or EMLA cream and subsided within half an hour after rubbing.

EMLA cream is a safe and effective way to alleviate pain during non-coring needle insertion in TIAP and enhance the overall comfort of patients. We recommend applying EMLA cream 1 h before needle insertion of TIAP, especially in patients having needle phobia or high pain scores from previous non-coring needle insertion.