Endovenous interventions are keyhole operations for varicose veins that are carried out from within the vein itself. Varicose veins are enlarged veins close to the surface of the skin. They are connected to the bigger deeper veins in the leg (known as deep veins). Because of this, operations to close the varicose veins can increase the chance of a blood clot forming in the deep veins. Blood clots in the deep veins happen in around 1 in 50 people after endovenous operations. A clot in the leg can cause swelling, pain, and other long-term problems. If a clot in the leg breaks off and travels to the lungs, it can cause problems with the lung' ability to move oxygen from the air into the blood and may, in rare cases, be life threatening.
Varicose vein procedures may carry a slightly higher risk of blood clot formation, and we are currently unsure if current clot reducing medicines are beneficial in preventing blood clots in people having varicose vein procedures.
This study will investigate if it is worthwhile prescribing medicines to reduce blood clots after varicose vein procedures.

Start Date22 Jan 2024

Sponsor / Collaborator

Imperial College London

NCT05625932

/ CompletedPhase 3IIT

Prophylaxis of Venous Thromboembolic Disease With Low Molecular Weight (LMWH) (TINzaparin) in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Start the First Line of Treatment.

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who are scheduled to receive systemic cancer therapy have an increased risk for venous thromboembolic (VTE) events compared with the general population.
PROTINCOL is a randomized, open label, non placebo-controlled, low intervention, and phase III clinical trial that will recruit patients with mCRC. The study hypothesizes that prophylaxis with Tinzaparin could prevent the appearance of symptomatic and incidental VTE.
All patients will receive the first-line anticancer treatment deemed more appropriate according to the physician criteria. Enrolled patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio (stratifying by BRAF/RAS, resection of primary tumor, and anti-angiogenic first-line treatment) to: control arm (no interventions related to VTE risk and no placebo) or experimental arm (prophylactic Tinzaparin at a fixed dose of 4500 IU/day in patients with up to 80kg, 6000 IU/day for those between 80-100 kg, or 8000 IU/day for those >100kg). Treatment is scheduled for a maximum period of 4 months. Treatment could be stopped earlier in case of unacceptable toxicity, patient consent withdrawal, physician criteria or end of study. Patients will undergo tumor and VTE assessments according to standard clinical practice.
The main objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of tinzaparin for the prevention of symptomatic or incidental VTE events. Secondary objectives include the associations between VTE events and tumor characteristics (i.e. laterality, RAS/BRAF mutations) or management (i.e. surgery or treatment with anti-angiogenic or anti-EGFR agents), cancer-specific survival outcomes, safety, the incidence of bleeding events, and patient-reported quality of life. The trial includes also a translational exploratory analysis to assess the predictive value of risk assessment models and genetic risk scores, their evolution through the study and microsatellite instability or other biomarkers.

Start Date02 Mar 2023

Sponsor / Collaborator

Leo Pharma, Inc.

NCT05255003

/ RecruitingPhase 4IIT

STrategies for Anticoagulation in Patients With thRombocytopenia and Cancer-associated Thrombosis

Patients with cancer are prone to have blood clots, which are usually treated with blood thinners. The main complication of blood thinners is bleeding. This is especially a concern when the number of platelets in the blood is lower than 50,000 per microliter. The role of platelets is to stop bleeding, so when the number of platelets is low, patients are at a higher risk of bleeding. Cancer patients are prone to have lower platelet numbers due to cancer therapies and/or cancer itself. It is not clear what the best treatment is for cancer patients who need blood thinners for a blood clot but have low platelet counts.
The investigators plan to do a small study called a pilot study to help plan for a larger study in such patients. In the pilot study, investigators will include 50 patients with cancer, low platelet counts, and a blood clot diagnosed within 4 weeks. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment strategies: the full dose of blood thinners along with platelet transfusion or a reduced dose of blood thinners without platelet transfusion. The investigators will follow all patients for 90 days. If this pilot study is successful, it will help lead to a much larger trial, which will provide important information on the best treatment strategy in these patients.

Start Date29 Aug 2022

Sponsor / Collaborator

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

100 Clinical Results associated with Tinzaparin Sodium

100 Translational Medicine associated with Tinzaparin Sodium

100 Patents (Medical) associated with Tinzaparin Sodium

515

Literatures (Medical) associated with Tinzaparin Sodium

21 Oct 2025·NEUROLOGY

Intracranial Hemorrhage With Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin in Brain Tumors

Review

Author: Fuse, Kenshiro ; Rhee, John Y. ; Goulart, Thiago Oscar ; Wang, Chen ; Zambrano, Daniela ; Bukhari, Yasir

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:

Patients with brain tumors face an increased risk of arterial and venous thromboembolic events. However, owing to risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), clinician practice patterns vary on preference for anticoagulation treatment. This meta-analysis evaluates the safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) on the development of ICH in patients with brain tumor.

METHODS:

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (January 2010-June 2025) for randomized-controlled trials or cohort studies enrolling adults (age ≥18 years) with primary or metastatic brain tumors receiving therapeutic DOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, betrixaban, and dabigatran) vs LMWH (enoxaparin, dalteparin, nadroparin, and tinzaparin). Studies limited to prophylactic dosing or non-brain tumor patients were excluded. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated using a restricted random-effects model. Heterogeneity (I²) and bias were evaluated, with prespecified subgroups (tumor type, follow-up duration, and study quality) and sensitivity analyses. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42025635334).

RESULTS:

Among 762 publications identified, 10 retrospective cohort studies (1,572 patients: 645 DOAC, 895 LMWH) were included. Patients' mean or median age ranged 60.4-67 years (DOAC) vs 53-64 years (LMWH), with follow-up durations ranging from 3 to 12 months. Patients with primary or metastatic brain tumors receiving DOACs had a statistically significantly lower risk of any ICH compared with LMWH (RR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.29-0.87; p = 0.01, I² = 49.50%). Reduction was more pronounced in 3 studies with three-month follow-up (RR = 0.23, 95% CI 0.09-0.57; p < 0.01, I² < 0.01%). Stratified analyses showed reduced ICH risk with DOACs in primary brain tumors (5 studies, RR = 0.20, 95% CI 0.08-0.54; p < 0.01, I² < 0.01%) but not in metastatic brain tumors (5 studies, RR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.44-1.68; p = 0.66, I² = 36.04%). Leave-one-out analyses confirmed robustness, and cumulative meta-analysis demonstrated stable estimates with narrowing CIs. Egger (p = 0.19) and Begg (p = 0.59) tests showed no statistical evidence of publication bias.

DISCUSSION:

In the current meta-analysis, DOACs were associated with significantly lower ICH risk than LMWH in patients with anticoagulated brain tumor, particularly those with primary brain tumors. Findings support DOACs as a safe anticoagulant in arterial and venous thromboembolism. Given observational designs with inherent confounding, findings warrant cautious interpretation.

01 Sep 2025·BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY

Influence of anticoagulant concomitant medication on wound healing: Analysis of a multicentre cohort of 212 patients with a uniform wound model

Article

Author: Hanafieh, Fares ; Metelmann, Hans‐Robert ; Wolff, Jan ; Seebauer, Christian ; Vollmer, Marcus

Aims:

Various factors can impair wound healing by disrupting key stages of the process. This study evaluates the impact of concomitant anticoagulant medication on wound healing in a cohort of 212 patients.

Methods:

Data from 2 open‐label, blindly evaluated, prospective, randomized, multicentre phase III trials (n = 212) were analysed. Healing durations of patients taking anticoagulants were compared to a control group (split‐thickness skin graft donor site halves treated with standard moist wound dressing). Kaplan–Meier estimators and multivariable Cox regression were applied.

Results:

Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated significantly accelerated wound healing in patients treated with enoxaparin or nadroparin. Among monotherapies, 75% of patients on enoxaparin achieved wound closure within 16.5 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14–21), and those on nadroparin within 15 days (95% CI: 11.5–19), compared to 24 days (95% CI: 20–28) in patients receiving other anticoagulants (log‐rank test: P < .001). Cox regression confirmed a significantly faster healing rate with enoxaparin or nadroparin (hazard ratio = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.02–2.19, P = .039).

Conclusion:

Enoxaparin and nadroparin may enhance wound healing, whereas phenprocoumon, acetylsalicylic acid, and certain low‐molecular‐weight heparins (certoparin, tinzaparin, dalteparin, bemiparin) appear to delay wound healing. Anticoagulant monotherapy with enoxaparin or nadroparin should be considered postoperatively when feasible.

08 Aug 2025·Cureus Journal of Medical Science

Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment and Prophylaxis: An Audit-Based Study

Article

Author: O'Shea, Susan ; Akhtar, Asfia N ; Hameed, Faizan

INTRODUCTION:

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), mainly deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), persists as a critical contributor to hospital-acquired mortality. Despite its largely preventable nature, early 2024 data from Bon Secours Hospital in Cork revealed alarmingly low compliance with VTE prophylaxis protocol.

AIM:

This study evaluated the implementation efficacy of VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis in adult hospitalised patients at Bon Secours Hospital, Cork, according to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines.

METHODOLOGY:

Adult patients (127) at increased risk of VTE, specifically individuals aged ≥60 years, patients undergoing major surgical procedures, and/or patients with comorbidities including active cancer, hypertension, diabetes, immunological disorders, immobility or haematological disorders, across nine wards were included in this study. We also checked for any kind of bleeding risk, like active bleeding or low platelets. Each point was given 1 mark if present, which added to increase risk of VTE. We analysed the data to check the compliance with accurate prescription and completeness of the forms according to the NICE guideline. Exclusion criteria included paediatric, gynaecological, day-case admissions, and discharges within 24 hours of admission. The incomplete/inaccurate risk assessments were reported to improve timely and correct prophylaxis prescription. Results: Compliance surged with assessment completion, reaching 111 out of 127 (87.39%) with prescription accuracy. Timely assessments within 24 hours accounted for 101 (79.52%), yet 16 (12.64%) remained unassessed. A substantial proportion (103, 80.23%) exhibited one or more VTE risk factors, predominantly advanced age and multiple comorbidities. Anticoagulants, particularly tinzaparin, constituted the principal prophylactic measure, with mechanical prophylaxis employed in only 15 (11.81%). Alarmingly, 22 (17.32%) of high-risk individuals were not prescribed any form of prophylaxis.

CONCLUSION:

This study underscores the transformative impact of enforced protocol adherence and targeted multidisciplinary staff education on VTE prevention. The integration of an electronic health record system with real-time prompts could further ensure prophylaxis within the critical 24-hour window.

News (Medical) associated with Tinzaparin Sodium

17 Jul 2025

·www.fiercepharma.com

Leo Pharma's slow response to app lapse scolded by UK marketing watchdog

Leo Pharma accepted that “appropriate actions were not taken to rectify the issue immediately” with its Innohep app. Leo Pharma’s inaccurate Innohep app has prompted a slap-down from the PMCPA. The U.K. marketing watchdog ruled Leo brought discredit on the pharma industry by leaving the app live for three months after the errors were discovered. Two healthcare professionals complained to the PMCPA about an app for patients prescribed Innohep, Leo’s tinzaparin sodium product. The app presented information from the patient information leaflet, and users were prompted to select their prescribed dosage and shown information on injection technique.Both complainants flagged inaccuracies in the dosing information presented in the app. A Leo employee identified the errors in August 2024, and Leo’s medical affairs team learned of the inaccuracies the next day, according to the PMCPA report, yet the app was still available when the PMCPA contacted Leo in November. Leo deactivated the app and made an updated version available within two weeks of being contacted by the PMCPA.Responding to the marketing authority, Leo said two senior medical affairs employees concluded that the full volume of the syringe would always be administered, despite any conflicting information in the app, and, as such, the inaccuracies didn’t affect patient safety. The PMCPA panel took a dim view of Leo’s conclusion, stating that inaccurate dosing information is a serious matter regardless of the likelihood of a safety issue. The panel said it “was extremely concerned about Leo Pharma’s lack of urgency” and the company’s “conscious decision to keep the app live with the inaccuracies for approximately three months.” The dosage volume inaccuracies and failure to withdraw the app immediately could “reduce confidence in the industry being able to produce patient material to the required quality standards,” the panel said.Leo accepted that “appropriate actions were not taken to rectify the issue immediately.” The company listed mitigating factors that may have played a role in the failings, including a disruption that affected the company from July, when the app was certified, to October, when Leo was still working through its response to the inaccuracies. “At the time of this issue occurring there was a reorganization of the thrombosis business impacting resource and headcount; many colleagues’ roles were placed at risk of redundancy. There was no dedicated medical support for the U.K. thrombosis business at this time,” Leo said. “Whilst this does not negate the seriousness of the issue and decisions made, we believe this to be a contributing factor.”The PMCPA appeal board opted against imposing additional sanctions on Leo. The board reached the decision after assessing Leo’s work to enhance its governance, train staff and update its processes to add checks and scrutiny. Leo said “it was not experienced with creating and managing apps and had relied on external expertise,” according to the PMCPA, and would act differently if in the same situation today.

Patent Infringement

06 Nov 2023

·www.prnewswire.com

Global Antithrombotic/Anticoagulant Drugs Market Set to Reach $46.2 Billion by 2028 with a 7.9% CAGR

DUBLIN, Nov. 6, 2023 /PRNewswire/ -- The "Antithrombotic/Anticoagulant Drugs: Technologies and Global Markets" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering. The global antithrombotic/anticoagulant drugs market is expected to reach $46.2 billion in 2028 from $31.6 billion in 2023 at a CAGR of 7.9%. This report discusses the implications of the trends mentioned above in the context of the current size and growth of the antithrombotic/anticoagulant drugs market, in global terms and by the most important national markets. Companies in the relevant pharmaceutical and medical industries are discussed, with profiles of the leaders and an update on M&A activity. Five-year global sales forecasts are provided for the leading drug categories and the country offers breakdowns of the antithrombotic/anticoagulant drugs market. Major players, competitive intelligence, innovative technologies, market dynamics and regional opportunities are discussed in detail. The report examines recent developments and product portfolios of major players. The patent analysis focuses on technological trends in recent years in regions such as the U.S., Europe, and Japan. The report presents a market analysis and estimates the compound annual growth rate (CAGR) for the antithrombotic/anticoagulant drugs market. This report segments the global market by these geographic regions: North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and the Rest of the World. For market estimates, data are provided for 2022 as the base year, forecasted through 2023-2028. Companies Mentioned Bayer AG Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH Bristol Myers Squibb Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Johnson & Johnson Services Inc. Merck & Co. Inc. Pfizer Inc. Sanofi Report Includes 59 data tables and 35 additional tables Overview and an up-to-date analysis of the global markets for antithrombotic/anticoagulant drugs for the treatments of thrombotic (cardiovascular) disease Analyses of the global market trends, with historical market revenue data (sales figures) from 2020 to 2022, estimates for 2023, and projections of compound annual growth rates (CAGRs) through 2028 Examination of the market potential for antithrombotic/anticoagulant drugs, and quantification of the global market for these drugs and its market segments and sub-segments over the next five years Estimate of the actual market size and revenue forecast for the market, and corresponding market share analysis based on product type, application and region In-depth information (facts and figures) pertaining to the market drivers, challenges, opportunities and prospects, as well as the technologies, regulatory scenarios and impact of COVID-19 A look at the major vendors in the global market for antithrombotic/anticoagulant drugs, and analysis of the healthcare industry structure, including market shares and recent mergers and acquisitions (M&A) activity Review of key patent grants and a look at breakthrough innovations, novel products, upcoming trends and technologies, and emerging applications for cardiovascular treatments Insight into the importance of ESG in the worldwide market, with a look at consumer attitudes, risks and opportunities assessment, and ESG practices followed by manufacturers and service providers Identification of the major stakeholders, and analysis of the competitive landscape based on recent developments, key financials and segmental revenues, and operational integration Profiles of the leading market players The following are the main conclusions reached in this report regarding antithrombotic and anticoagulant drugs: Recent innovations and the emergence of novel thrombin inhibitors have led to the decrease in revenue of traditional anticoagulants such as heparin and Vitamin K antagonists. Low molecular weight heparins, such as Fragmin (-11.8%) and Innohep (-14.1%), have seen a significant decrease in the market. The anticoagulant drug market will continue to grow at a slow rate compared to antiplatelet and thrombin inhibitors segment due to the lack of new drug launches since the expiration of the patent on Plavix. The anticoagulant segment is expected to decline soon as prices fall and the market for novel thrombin inhibitors grows. The market for thrombin inhibitors is expected to grow at the highest CAGR of 8.1% over the forecast period of 2023 to 2028. Xarelto (rivaroxaban), Eliquis (apixaban), TNKase (tenecteplase) and Savaysa (edoxaban) are the major contributors to the high growth rate of thrombin inhibitors. An aging population and the increased prevalence of cardiovascular disease worldwide fueled by a Westernized diet and lifestyle have created new opportunities for antithrombotic/ anticoagulant drug products. Key Topics Covered: Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 2 Summary and Highlights Market Outlook Market Summary Chapter 3 Market Overview Overview of Cardiovascular Disease Coronary Artery Disease Atherosclerosis Angina (Angina Pectoris) Acute Myocardial Infarction Medical Management Lifestyle Changes Diet Modification Smoking Cessation Pharmaceuticals Anticoagulants and Antiplatelet Drugs Major Drivers Coagulation Factors Targeted to Reduce Cvd The Global Burden of Cardiovascular Disease 2030 Global Burden of Cardiovascular Disease The Global Economic Burden of Cardiovascular Disease Sales Performance of Major Drugs in 2022 Chapter 4 Global Market for Anticoagulant Drugs Overview Products Low Molecular Weight Heparin Oral Anticoagulants (Vitamin K Antagonists) Global Anticoagulant Drugs Market Forecast Chapter 5 Global Market for Antiplatelet Drugs Overview Products Oral Antiplatelets Global Antiplatelet Drugs Market Forecast Chapter 6 Global Market for Thrombin Inhibitors Overview Products Direct Thrombin Inhibitors Thrombolytic Agents Direct Factor Xa Inhibitors Global Thrombin Inhibitors Market Forecast Chapter 7 Global Market for Antithrombotic/Anticoagulant Drugs by Region Overview North America Europe Asia-Pacific Rest of the World Chapter 8 Sustainability in the Market for Antithrombotic/Anticoagulant Drugs: An ESG Perspective Introduction to ESG Sustainability in Market for Antithrombotic/Anticoagulant Drugs: An ESG Perspective Key ESG Issues Consumer Attitudes Towards ESG Industry ESG Performance Analysis Case Study Concluding Remarks Chapter 9 Clinical Trials and Patent Landscape Clinical Trials Analysis Patent Analysis Patent by Assignee Chapter 10 M&A and Venture Funding Outlook Chapter 11 Competitive Landscape Chapter 12 Company Profiles Chapter 13 Appendix For more information about this report visit About ResearchAndMarkets.com ResearchAndMarkets.com is the world's leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends. Media Contact: Research and Markets Laura Wood, Senior Manager [email protected] For E.S.T Office Hours Call +1-917-300-0470 For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call +1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900 U.S. Fax: 646-607-1907 Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716 Logo: SOURCE Research and Markets

100 Deals associated with Tinzaparin Sodium

External Link

KEGG	Wiki	ATC	Drug Bank
D06398	Tinzaparin Sodium	B01AB10	DB06822

R&D Status

10 top approved records.

to view more data

Indication	Country/Location	Organization	Date
Pulmonary Embolism	United States	LEO Pharma A/S	14 Jul 2000
Venous Thrombosis	United States	LEO Pharma A/S	14 Jul 2000
Thrombosis	Canada	Novo Nordisk Canada, Inc.	31 Dec 1994

Clinical Result

Indication

Phase

Evaluation

View All Results

Study	Phase	Population	Analyzed Enrollment	Group	Results	Evaluation	Publication Date


ISTH2022	Not Applicable	Superficial Thrombophlebitis	147	tinzaparin	ukneacyjuz(jmaxmzidot) = xmkrtzwrst ruzvlirhgo (ytwwzxebyw )	-	09 Jul 2022
Onco-CAST (ASCO2022)	Phase 4	Colorectal Cancer	175	Tinzaparin 8.000 Anti-Xa IU	fhsvhtands(vjqmqkdvlt) = qczzwhfdkf eurzcwjbey (spbxmtjifr, 2.3 - 8.8) View more	-	02 Jun 2022
NCT01455831 (Periop-01, ASCO_GI2022) Manual	Phase 3	Colorectal Cancer	602	Tinzaparin Sodium (Extended peri-operative thromboprophylaxis)	gvjsstzlfg(axggvatkox) = urczzchrcz giiktubgqy (xwhelcsbof ) View more	Non-superior	19 Jan 2022
NCT01455831 (Periop-01, ASCO_GI2022) Manual	Phase 3	Colorectal Cancer	602	Tinzaparin Sodium (Standard thromboprophylaxis)	gvjsstzlfg(axggvatkox) = mecsdvbbzo giiktubgqy (xwhelcsbof ) View more	Non-superior	19 Jan 2022
iCaLT study (ERS2021)	Not Applicable	Lung Cancer	60	Tinzaparin 0.5 ml, 10.000 Anti-Xa IU	mgfobxmsus(epflbsenys) = Low in patients with bleeding compared to others nalswxucrw (srdexfhnxr )	Positive	05 Sep 2021
ISTH2020	Not Applicable	Venous Thromboembolism	287	Weight-adjusted Tinzaparin	peyvyxzqdw(xxccxuegor) = ehfiobadiy kmrdoztdjs (unjryasbdy )	-	12 Jul 2020
ISTH2020	Not Applicable	Venous Thromboembolism	287	No prophylaxis or subcutaneous UFH	peyvyxzqdw(xxccxuegor) = jioceughae kmrdoztdjs (unjryasbdy )	-	12 Jul 2020
TROPIQUE (ISTH2020)	Not Applicable	Thrombosis	-	Long-term tinzaparin treatment	fhhcjodbfm(xrhnuoazup) = bphmbujehy jzggzlhasr (invwfdwfjs ) View more	Positive	12 Jul 2020
PROSPERO CRD42020139413 (ISTH2020)	Not Applicable	Chronic Kidney Diseases	1,831	Tinzaparin	udyqjjvakx(memhekfeqs) = bimoifngqw kawnwqxboz (jgnwaxermv, (0.85 - 3.61)) View more	-	12 Jul 2020
NCT00186745 (TRIVET, ASH 12016 \| ASH 22016) Manual	Not Applicable	Chronic Kidney Diseases	148	Tinzaparin (1st measurement (Day 3-5))	asydpmocsi(srxtrthgsj) = eybzbqazbb tcpuwuhrbf (neiagwslsp, 0.22) View more	Positive	02 Dec 2016
NCT00186745 (TRIVET, ASH 12016 \| ASH 22016) Manual	Not Applicable	Chronic Kidney Diseases	148	Tinzaparin (2nd measurement (Day 5-7))	asydpmocsi(srxtrthgsj) = zuulvwzrun tcpuwuhrbf (neiagwslsp, 0.09) View more	Positive	02 Dec 2016
TiCAT study (ERS2016)	Not Applicable	Venous Thromboembolism	246	Tinzaparin	fkfihjdept(xesxjgzlvd) = cseexdgywo qrjvpagock (twbuudekuh ) View more	Positive	01 Sep 2016
NCT01130025 (IN 0901 INT, Pubmed \| J Coll Physicians Surg Pak \| JAMA) Manual	Phase 3	Neoplasms \| Venous Thromboembolism	900	Tinzaparin	knmrmdfxcb(rbrgthoieo) = tryiqdvixo ymukkirfys (yiaqwvjzkk ) View more	Non-superior	18 Aug 2015
	Phase 3	Neoplasms \| Venous Thromboembolism	900	Tinzaparin+warfarin	knmrmdfxcb(rbrgthoieo) = vfopoumwnn ymukkirfys (yiaqwvjzkk ) View more	Non-superior	18 Aug 2015

Translational Medicine

Boost your research with our translational medicine data.

view full example data

Deal

Boost your decision using our deal data.

view full example data

Core Patent

Boost your research with our Core Patent data.

view full example data

Clinical Trial

Identify the latest clinical trials across global registries.

view full example data

Approval

Accelerate your research with the latest regulatory approval information.

view full example data

Regulation

Understand key drug designations in just a few clicks with Synapse.

view full example data

AI Agents Built for Biopharma Breakthroughs

Accelerate discovery. Empower decisions. Transform outcomes.

Get started for free today!

Accelerate Strategic R&D decision making with Synapse, PatSnap’s AI-powered Connected Innovation Intelligence Platform Built for Life Sciences Professionals.

Start your data trial now!

Synapse data is also accessible to external entities via APIs or data packages. Empower better decisions with the latest in pharmaceutical intelligence.

Bio

Bio Sequences Search & Analysis

Chemical

Chemical Structures Search & Analysis

Tinzaparin Sodium

Overview

Basic Info

Related

External Link

R&D Status

Clinical Result

Translational Medicine

Deal

Core Patent

Clinical Trial

Approval

Regulation