MK-8776

The levels and activities of the DNA/RNA helicase schlafen11 (SLFN11) and the serine/threonine-protein kinase ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR) may determine cancer cell sensitivity to DNA damaging agents, including platinum drugs. Here, we studied the roles of SLFN11 and ATR in cisplatin resistance of ovarian cancer using cell lines displaying acquired or intrinsic cisplatin resistance. W1CR, the cisplatin-resistant subline of W1 ovarian cancer cells, displayed reduced SLFN11 levels. HDAC inhibition using entinostat returned an epigenetic downregulation of SLFN11 in W1CR cells, caused SLFN11 re-expression and re-sensitized these cells to cisplatin. Moreover, entinostat also sensitized intrinsically resistant EFO21 ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin by upregulating SLFN11. However, SLFN11 was not involved in cisplatin resistance in all other cell models. Thus, SLFN11 expression is not a general cisplatin resistance marker in ovarian cancer. In contrast, inhibition of the DNA damage repair master regulator ATR using sub-toxic concentrations of elimusertib sensitized parental cell lines as well as intrinsically resistant EFO21 cells to cisplatin, and fully reversed acquired cisplatin resistance in cisplatin-adapted sublines W1CR, A2780cis, and Kuramochi^rCDDP²⁰⁰⁰. Mechanisms underlying ATR-mediated cisplatin resistance differed between the cell lines and included CHK1/WEE1 signaling and induction of homologous recombination. In conclusion, SLFN11 and ATR are involved in ovarian cancer cisplatin resistance. Although our data identify ATR as key target for tackling cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer, future studies are needed to identify biomarkers that indicate, which individual ovarian cancers benefit from SLFN11 re-activation and/or ATR inhibition.

The ATR-CHK1 pathway plays a fundamental role in the DNA damage response and is therefore an attractive target in cancer therapy. The antitumorous effect of ATR inhibitors is at least partly caused by synthetic lethality between ATR and various DNA repair genes. In previous studies, we have identified members of the B-family DNA polymerases as potential lethal partner for ATR, i.e. POLD1 and PRIM1. In this study, we validated and characterized the synthetic lethality between ATR and POLA1. First, we applied a model of ATR-deficient DLD-1 human colorectal cancer cells to confirm synthetic lethality by using chemical POLA1 inhibition. Analyzing cell cycle and apoptotic markers via FACS and Western blotting, we were able to show that apoptosis and S phase arrest contributed to the increased sensitivity of ATR-deficient cancer cells towards POLA1 inhibitors. Importantly, siRNA-mediated POLA1 depletion in ATR-deficient cells caused similar effects in regard to impaired cell viability and cumulation of apoptotic markers, thus excluding toxic effects of chemical POLA1 inhibition. Conversely, we demonstrated that siRNA-mediated POLA1 depletion sensitized several cancer cell lines towards chemical inhibition of ATR and its main effector kinase CHK1. In conclusion, the synthetic lethality between ATR/CHK1 and POLA1 might represent a novel and promising approach for individualized cancer therapy: First, alterations of POLA1 could serve as a screening parameter for increased sensitivity towards ATR and CHK1 inhibitors. Second, alterations in the ATR-CHK1 pathway might predict in increased sensitivity towards POLA1 inhibitors.