BeOne Medicines (formerly BeiGene; Basel, Switzerland; Nasdaq: ONC) appears to have terminated a Phase I clinical trial for BG-60366, an orally administered chimeric degradation activation compound (CDAC) designed to degrade mutant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) protein. A Phase I clinical trial assessing the drug candidate in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been listed as terminated on the clinicaltrials.gov platform, with the decision described as reflecting an “evaluation on business strategy” rather than safety issues.
The Phase I, open-label, multicenter, non-randomized trial had enrolled 33 participants before being halted ahead of its May 2026 primary completion date, with no efficacy, safety, or pharmacokinetic data released publicly.
The trial enrolled adults with histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced or metastatic NSCLC carrying EGFR activating mutations who had progressed on prior third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. The safety expansion cohort specifically required documentation of EGFR resistance mutations, including the C797S substitution — a mechanism of acquired resistance to osimertinib (Tagrisso) that eliminates covalent binding at the drug’s target cysteine residue. Prior treatment with fourth-generation EGFR-TKIs or other CDAC or PROTAC compounds targeting EGFR resistance mutations was an exclusion criterion.
Sites spanned the US, China, Australia, South Korea, Spain, Italy, Brazil, Thailand, Malaysia, and New Zealand, with enrollment active at institutions including Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, MD Anderson Cancer Center, and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre.
The CDAC modality itself presents specific early-phase challenges that may have been relevant. Oral bioavailability for compounds in this class is frequently suboptimal, and the efficiency of ternary complex formation between the degrader, target protein, and E3 ligase can be difficult to predict from preclinical models. A “hook effect” — reduced degradation activity at higher concentrations due to formation of unproductive binary complexes — is a known class liability. Whether any of these factors contributed to the decision to halt BG-60366 development cannot be established from the available public record.
Pipeline context
The BeiGene clinical trial termination of BG-60366 occurred during a period of deliberate portfolio rationalization at BeOne Medicines. The company, which rebranded from BeiGene and redomiciled to Basel, Switzerland in 2025, simultaneously shelved several other early-stage oncology programs including a pan-KRAS inhibitor, a MAT2A inhibitor, a CDK2 inhibitor, and an anti-CCR8 monoclonal antibody, as well as a Phase II rheumatoid arthritis study.
BeOne’s current development priorities center on Brukinsa (zanubrutinib), its approved BTK inhibitor generating the bulk of company revenue, alongside sonrotoclax, BGB-16673 — a BTK-targeted CDAC in hematology — and zanidatamab in HER2-positive solid tumors. BG-60366, as an early-stage exploratory asset that had not yet established proof of concept, occupied a different tier of the portfolio. The company had previously indicated internal proof-of-concept data readouts for BG-60366 were expected in the second half of 2025, a timeline that subsequently shifted to the first half of 2026 before the trial was terminated.
Acquired resistance to third-generation EGFR-TKIs, particularly osimertinib, represents one of the central unresolved problems in NSCLC management. The C797S resistance mutation, which abolishes covalent binding of osimertinib to EGFR exon 20, occurs in a subset of patients progressing on third-generation therapy and has no approved targeted treatment. Protein degradation as a strategy to overcome this resistance is mechanistically rational — by routing the entire EGFR protein to the proteasome rather than relying on covalent inhibition, degraders can in principle remain active against C797S-bearing EGFR.
However, the clinical translation of EGFR-targeted degraders has proven difficult. Other companies that have suffered clinical setbacks include C4 Therapeutics’ CFT8919, partnered with Betta Pharmaceutical, which was pulled earlier this year according to the firm’s Q1’26 financial report. The competitive environment includes both fourth-generation EGFR-TKI programs designed to address resistance mutations through allosteric or non-covalent mechanisms and other CDAC or PROTAC approaches. Of note, AstraZeneca exercised an option to co-develop a bispecific antibody-based EGFR degrader from Pinetree Therapeutics in April this year.
This article was generated with AI assistance and reviewed and edited by the AllSci editorial team Explore more at AllSci News: https://allsci.com/news/
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Comment *
Name *
Email *
Website
Copyright © 2026. AllSci Corp. All rights reserved.