Bisoprolol

WEDNESDAY, Sept. 11, 2024 -- For patients with resistant hypertension , a quadruple single pill is superior to triple therapy, according to a study presented at the European Society of Cardiology Congress, held from Aug. 30 to Sept. 2 in London. Stefano Taddei, from the University of Pisa in Italy, and colleagues conducted a double-blind, randomized trial involving patients with resistant hypertension. Participants completed an eight-week run-in period during which they received the triple combination of perindopril, indapamide, and amlodipine. Those with uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) after eight weeks while adherent to therapy were randomly allocated to continue the same triple therapy or receive a single-pill combination containing perindopril, indapamide, amlodipine, and bisoprolol. A total of 183 patients from 49 centers in 13 countries were included in the trial. The researchers found that the mean office sitting systolic BP was reduced by 20.67 and 11.32 mm Hg in the quadruple single-pill group and in the triple group, respectively, after eight weeks, with the adjusted difference significant in favor of the quadruple single pill. For the main secondary end point of mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP, there was a significant difference for the quadruple single pill versus the triple group (−7.53 mm Hg); in addition, there was a significant difference in favor of the quadruple single-pill group in mean office sitting diastolic BP (−6.14 mm Hg). BP control was achieved by 66.3 and 42.7 percent on the quadruple single pill and on triple therapy, respectively. "The availability of a quadruple single-pill combination that includes bisoprolol could help with non-adherence and provide much-needed effective BP control in patients with resistant or difficult-to-treat hypertension," Taddei said in a statement. Several authors disclosed ties to the pharmaceutical and medical device industry, including Servier, which funded the study. Press Release More Information Whatever your topic of interest, subscribe to our newsletters to get the best of Drugs.com in your inbox.

At the ESC Congress, Dr. Milton Packer highlighted recent research into beta blocker treatment for myocardial infarction. Credit: luchschenF via Shutterstock. A shift in the beta-blocker treatment paradigm has arrived with the changing myocardial infarction treatment landscape, said a researcher at the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Congress, held from 31 August to 2 September. Over the past 40 years, the research space has operated on an understanding that immediate inhibition by beta-blockers reduces left ventricular rupture, and further myocardial infarction , said Dr. Milton Packer, distinguished scholar in cardiovascular science at Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas. Additionally, the belief was that delayed long-term blockade can lead to left ventricular dysfunction, he said. Beta-blockers are a class of drugs that act by inhibiting the actions of hormones such as adrenaline to slow down the heart. Commonly used beta blockers include Abbott ’s Tenormin (atenolol), MSD’s Cardicor (bisoprolol), and GSK ’s Trandate (labetalol). However, Packer explained that the beta blocker response has changed as percutaneous interventions, reperfusion therapies, antiplatelet drugs and more have entered the treatment landscape for myocardial infarction. At the ongoing ESC Congress talk titled “Should we give beta blockers post-myocardial infarction?” Packer said that questions have been raised surrounding the use of the drugs in patients with myocardial infarction and preserved ejection fraction, referencing the Phase IIII REDUCE-AMI study (NCT03278509). See Also: Novavax wins FDA emergency approval for updated Covid-19 vaccine Combating Pharmaceutical Crime with On-Dose Authentication REDUCE-AMI, which was funded by the Swedish Research Council, tested the use of beta-blockers after myocardial infarction and preserved ejection fraction. The study found that for patients with acute myocardial infarction who underwent early coronary angiography and had preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, long-term beta-blocker treatment did not lower the risk of death from any cause or new myocardial infarctions compared to no beta-blocker use. Despite the conclusion of the REDUCE-AMI study, Packer highlighted the fact that researchers have only investigated and proven the effectiveness of non-selective beta blockers in post-myocardial infarction trials, so further research is required. He added that physicians will have to take into account the degree of beta-blockade in future treatment regimens.