From enhancing mobility and motor function to improving sensory capabilities, brain-computer interfaces (BCI) can expand our human capabilities by enabling seamless communication, improving cognitive functions, and accelerating the development of medical treatments. However, current fundamental limitations with current invasive and non-invasive technologies suggest that for consumer-grade BCI to become ubiquitous, new technologies need to be developed and validated.
In order to realize the fullest potential of BCI, we need a system that 1) transmits data wirelessly 2) does not rely on surgical installation 3) maintains the proximal contact between nerve tissue and material required for efficient transfer of energy and information, and 4) can both stimulate and record neural activity (or bidirectional capabilities). To bridge the gap between invasive and non-invasive technologies, nanoscale materials, such as biocompatible nanoparticles, provide a promising alternative, allowing us to design materials at the scale of cellular systems and structures.
Nanoparticles: A novel approach to BCI
Healthcare
Using Data to Help Healthcare Practices Succeed
A new report from Relatient, A Data-Driven Guide to Patient Access Succes, highlights how focusing on data accuracy and relevance can enhance the performance of healthcare practices.
By Relatient
The use of nanomaterials, such as conducting polymers or graphene, to improve implanted electrodes has been the focus of extensive research, but ultimately, these materials still must enter the brain surgically. For a technology to access brain tissue with the minimum possible intervention, one must design components at the scale of cells themselves.
Due to their small size (<100 nm) nanoparticles are capable of intimate interaction with nerve tissue and are capable of entering the brain via minimally invasive pathways, including intravenous and intranasal routes through the blood-brain barrier. Nanoparticles are also amenable to multifaceted design. The particles themselves are large enough to have intrinsic material properties beyond their primary chemical composition, such as piezoelectric effect, but are small enough for surface functionalization with small molecules or biomolecules to play a significant role in their behavior in biological systems. These properties allow for the rational design of nanoantenna which can intermediate signals into and out of the brain and build technologies to serve as the foundation for future generations of BCI.
Neural modulation with nanoparticles
Using nanoparticles as antennae in the brain is a concept that has enjoyed extensive study in academic laboratories over the past 15 years. The vast majority of this work has focused on using nanoparticles for neuromodulation. While some results have been obtained using ultrasound or light to stimulate these particles, overwhelmingly the signal type of choice, given its relatively high tissue transparency, has been magnetic. There have been early results focused on magnetothermal or magnetomechanical mechanisms to excite neurons, but the most promising results have been obtained with magnetoelectric nanoparticles. These materials convert a general magnetic field into a highly localized electric field which can, in turn, activate neurons, and thus provide a promising platform for therapeutic stimulation and ultimately high fidelity transmission of information into the brain.
Exclusive
Improving the Healthcare Financial Experience to Help Care Flow
Zelis CEO Amanda Eisel shares her perspective on how the company is solving the problems of a fragmented health financial system to benefit all.
By Stephanie Baum
Magnetoelectric nanoparticles function via a multi-layer core-shell design, consisting of a magnetorestrictive core covered with a piezoelectric shell. In the presence of a magnetic field, the core deforms, which in turn deforms the shell, and creates a local electric field via the piezoelectric effect. The efficiency of this effect can be tuned by changing the size, shape, composition, and layer coupling of the particles.
Several groups have already introduced these materials into the brains of mice and primates. Kozielski and Anikeeva have demonstrated deep brain stimulation on wild type mice in rotorod, three chamber, and rotational tests, with comparable results to implanted electrodes and better biosafety profiles. Khizroev and Kaushik have demonstrated the ability for these particles to enter the brain through the blood-brain barrier or intranasally and to be localized in the brain with applied magnetic fields.
Each of these studies has demonstrated the biocompatibility of these materials in vitro and in vivo. Thus all the components of our ideal system are accounted for; magnetoelectric nanoparticles can enter the brain non-surgically, be localized, and stimulate critical areas in a safe and efficient manner. What remains in further proving the concept is further optimizing the efficiency of the magnetoelectric effect and biological interaction of these materials. All of the pieces are present, and so the time is now right to begin the translational research to bring these materials into BCI and broader bioelectronic medicine.
Neural reading with nanoparticles
Of primary importance in design criteria is the bidirectionality of future BCI systems. This can be accomplished with implanted electrode arrays but is difficult to implement with fully non-invasive systems. With nanoparticles, neural stimulation is more straightforward than neural reading given that an externally powered signal is being used. For neural reading, signal detection methods must either be extremely precise or particles need to be powered in situ for efficient signal transduction. This poses significant design challenges, and so the field is less mature, but some intriguing theoretical work has been published which beckons for further development.
Due to the aforementioned energetic limitations, the signal transduction mechanism for neural reading with nanoparticles must have a very low background interference. From a practical standpoint, then, the most promising candidates are magnetic fields and near-infrared light.
From the perspective of magnetic signal transduction, Magnetic Particle Imaging (MPI) is a technique that uses nonlinear magnetization properties of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles to image neural tissue dynamically, including neural injury and blood flow.
With magnetoelectric nanoparticles, MPI could image neural activity directly via a reversed mechanism from the one used for neural stimulation: changes in the local electric fields from neuronal activity change the shape and thus magnetic properties of the particles. The potential of these materials to function in this way with realistic neural electric activity has been confirmed in simulation by both the Khizroev and Hai groups but has not yet been realized experimentally. These are promising theoretical results, and with validation in vitro and in vivo, and miniaturization of MPI technology, magnetoelectric nanoparticles could serve as single component antennae for bidirectional BCI.
The other option for tissue transparency is near-infrared light. Near-infrared light is used to monitor neural activity in functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRs) by measuring hemodynamic activity via hemoglobin absorption. The primary limitation of this technique is its lack of temporal resolution due to reliance on fluid movement. Using light to read neural activity directly has been explored as part of optogenetics, a field that has revolutionized our understanding of brain and neural function, but as a translational BCI technology is limited by the requirement for genetic modification of the subject.
Here again, nanoparticles may provide the pathway to realizing a faster form of NIR neural activity imaging. Early work in this field focused on electrochromic quantum dots, but concerns over signal-to-noise ratio and material toxicity have limited this approach. Using plasmonic Gold/PEDOT: PSS nanoparticles, the Yanik group has shown, in simulation, that an electrochromic response can be obtained in the NIR-II region (1000-1700 nm) in which tissue has sufficient transparency for cortical imaging.
This mechanism relies on electrochromic plasmonic scattering, and is thus, in effect, externally powered. While these results are, as of yet, in silico the group has demonstrated a comparable effect on Gold/PEDOT: PSS surfaces, which allowed subcellular mapping of cardiomyocyte electrical activity. Given two potential avenues of recording neural activity with nanoparticles, experimental success in this field could help bring about a new era in BCI.
The future of nanoparticle technology in BCI
There is little doubt that in the next 5-10 years, we will be treated with an ever-growing number of examples of how BCI and related technologies can transform the way we live. Every month brings with it new patients with implanted BCIs and their stories of abilities restored and quality of life and independence improved. For non-invasive approaches, new applications for EEG and fNIRs are continuously being developed and will help us optimize our health and detect and diagnose diseases earlier.
Yet, beyond this time horizon, the broader adoption of BCI will require fundamental advances in its fundamental mechanisms and the development of technologies that provide high-fidelity transmission of information between mind and machine with limited installation. Nanoparticles can be instrumental in realizing this future and bringing the unlimited possibilities of BCI into everyday life.
Photo credit: DrAfter123, Getty Images
Alexandra Karpman, Scott Meek and Uri MagaramAlexandra Karpman is the Head of Product at Subsense, with over 11 years of experience in brain-computer interface (BCI) development and 6 years in biomedical product management. She holds a master’s degree in Neuroscience, focused on neurorehabilitation and restoring motor impairment after stroke. Alexandra began her career as a neuroscientist in startups developing products for industries like pharmaceutical, banking, and marketing. In 2022, Alexandra joined Subsense as Head of Neuroscience, helping shape the company’s vision, roadmap, and scientific advisory board. A year later, as Head of Product, she established partnerships with experts from institutions like UCSC, Harvard, Stanford, and ETH Zurich from scratch and secured seed funding, driving Subsense’s growth. Her expertise spans product vision, market strategy, and managing cross-functional teams. At Subsense, Alexandra applies her deep experience in BCI, healthcare, and startups to advance non-surgical brain-computer interface technologies.Dr. Scott Meek is the Head of R&D at Subsense and has spent the last 20 years developing new materials and sensors in academia, government labs, and biotech startups. After a B.A. in Chemistry from Dartmouth College, Dr. Meek completed his Ph.D. in Organic Chemistry at MIT in the research group of Tim Swager. His doctoral research focused on the design and synthesis of a new class of near-infrared fluorescent probes to detect beta-amyloid plaques. He moved on to Sandia National Labs as a postdoctoral fellow where he developed new nanoporous materials for gas and radiation sensing applications. At Subsense, he is delighted to bring together all of his experience in chemistry, materials science, multicomponent medical device, and product development to build the ultimate biosensor.Dr. Uri Magaram is an Experimental Applications Scientist at Subsense, focusing on developing non-invasive, nanoparticle-based brain-computer interfaces. He earned his B.A. in Integrated Science and Mathematics from Northwestern University, where he conducted in vivo and slice electrophysiology research in zebrafish and mice under Drs. Indira Raman and David McLean. This experience deepened his passion for neuroscience, leading him to pursue a Ph.D. in Neurosciences at the University of California, San Diego, in Dr. Sreekanth Chalasani's lab. At the Salk Institute for Biological Studies, Dr. Magaram advanced sonogenetics—a technique combining ultrasound and genetic engineering to control neural circuits—through comprehensive research from materials engineering to in vivo experiments in C. elegans and mice. He co-founded SonoBac, aiming to enhance biomanufacturing via sonogenetics, and served as Chief Scientific Officer for two years before joining Subsense to further his commitment to neurotechnology and brain research.This post appears through the MedCity Influencers program. Anyone can publish their perspective on business and innovation in healthcare on MedCity News through MedCity Influencers. Click here to find out how.