Islatravir

DOR/ISL is the first non-INSTI, two-drug regimen to demonstrate non-inferiority and a similar safety pro Week 48 to BIC/FTC/TAF in adults living with HIV-1 who had not previously received antiretroviral treatment DOR/ISL maintained virologic suppression at Week 96 in adults with virologically suppressed HIV-1 who switched from other oral antiretroviral therapies, including BIC/FTC/TAF RAHWAY, N.J.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- $MRK #MRK --Merck (NYSE: MRK), known as MSD outside of the United States and Canada, today announced the presentation of results from three pivotal Phase 3 trials evaluating the investigational, once-daily, oral, two-drug regimen of doravirine/islatravir [DOR/ISL (100 mg/0.25 mg), (MK-8591A)] in adults with HIV-1. The findings were shared in late-breaking presentations at the 33rd Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI) being held in Denver. “We are proud to continue building on our 40-year history of HIV research with the presentation of compelling new data from our HIV pipeline at CROI this year,” said Dr. Eliav Barr, senior vice president, head of global clinical development and chief medical officer, Merck Research Laboratories. “Islatravir blocks HIV-1 replication through multiple mechanisms, including reverse transcriptase translocation inhibition, and could serve as the anchor for a series of two-drug, non-INSTI, daily and weekly treatment regimens. If approved, DOR/ISL will be the first of these regimens in our portfolio and may provide an important new option to help meet the evolving treatment needs of people living with HIV.” The Phase 3, double-blind, clinical trial MK-8591A-053 evaluating DOR/ISL versus bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide i [(50 mg/200 mg/25 mg),(BIC/FTC/TAF)] in adults living with HIV-1 who had not previously received antiretroviral treatment (treatment-naïve), met its primary efficacy endpoint of percentage of participants achieving viral suppression (HIV-1 RNA 100,000 copies/mL). The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA 100,000 copies/mL, 10.3% had HIV-1 RNA >500,000 copies/mL and 17.2% had baseline CD4+ T-cell count 100,000 copies/mL (94.0% vs 87.6%, respectively) and >500,000 copies/mL (90.3% vs 84.4%, respectively). Drug-related AEs were reported in 14.1% of participants on DOR/ISL and 18.0% on BIC/FTC/TAF and discontinuations due to AEs (1.1% vs. 2.2%) were similar in both groups. Immune reconstitution was similar in DOR/ISL vs. comparator with no between-group differences in mean increases in CD4+ T-cell counts or total lymphocyte counts (TLC). About the Phase 3 data from MK-8591A-052 MK-8591A-052 is a Phase 3, randomized, active-controlled, double-blind, clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a switch to investigational, once-daily DOR/ISL (100 mg/0.25 mg) in adults with HIV-1 infection that has been virologically suppressed on BIC/FTC/TAF (50 mg/200 mg/25 mg). In this trial, 513 adults with HIV-1 who had virologic suppression for three months or more on BIC/FTC/TAF, no history of treatment failure and no known resistance to DOR were randomized (2:1) and switched to DOR/ISL (n= 342) or continued treatment with BIC/FTC/TAF (n=171). The primary efficacy endpoint, the percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL at Week 48 (non-inferiority margin 4%), was met, demonstrating non-inferiority to BIC/FTC/TAF; 1.5% of participants who switched to DOR/ISL had a viral load of ≥50 copies/mL at Week 48, compared to 0.6% on BIC/FTC/TAF (treatment difference 0.9%, 95% CI -1.9, 2.9). Results at Week 48 were recently published in The Lancet . At Week 96, DOR/ISL continued to demonstrate similar efficacy compared to BIC/FTC/TAF; 1.5% of participants on DOR/ISL had a viral load of ≥50 copies/mL compared to 1.2% of participants on BIC/FTC/TAF (treatment difference 0.3%, 95% CI -2.8, 2.4); 88.9% of participants on DOR/ISL maintained virologic suppression (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL) compared to 90.1% of participants continuing BIC/FTC/TAF (treatment difference -1.2%, 95% CI -6.5, 5.0). No hypothesis testing was performed for these secondary endpoints. The safety pro DOR/ISL at Week 96 continued to be similar to BIC/FTC/TAF with no new safety findings. No additional drug-related serious adverse events were reported in any group between Week 48 and Week 96. At Week 96, rates of discontinuation due to AEs were similar for both groups (3.2% vs. 2.9%). There were no differences between trial arms in CD4+ T-cell count or TLC changes through Week 96. About the Phase 3 data from MK-8591A-051 MK-8591A-051 is a Phase 3, open-label randomized, active-controlled, clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a switch to investigational, once-daily DOR/ISL (100 mg/0.25 mg) in adults with HIV-1 infection that has been virologically suppressed using bART. In this trial, 551 adults with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL for three months or more on oral 2- or 3-drug ART, with no history of treatment failure and no known virologic resistance to DOR, were randomized 2:1 and switched to DOR/ISL (n= 366) or continued bART (n=185), stratified by bART regimen. The primary efficacy endpoint, percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL at Week 48 (non-inferiority margin 4%), was met, demonstrating DOR/ISL to be non-inferior to bART; 1.4% of participants who received DOR/ISL had a viral load of ≥50 copies/mL at Week 48, compared to 4.9% on bART (treatment difference -3.6%, 95% CI -7.8, -0.8). After Week 48 of the comparative portion of the study, all participants received open-label DOR/ISL through Week 144. Results at Week 48 were recently published in The Lancet . At Week 96, 1.9% of participants who continued on DOR/ISL for 96 weeks had HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL and 1.1% of participants who switched from bART to DOR/ISL at Week 48. Additionally, 92.6% of participants who were on DOR/ISL through 96 weeks and 96.6% of participants who switched to DOR/ISL at Week 48 maintained virologic suppression (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL) at Week 96. At Week 96, there were similar rates of drug-related AEs between those who continued on DOR/ISL (13.7%) for 96 weeks and for those who switched from bART to DOR/ISL at Week 48 (11.3%) and rates of discontinuations due to AEs for those on DOR/ISL for 96 weeks (1.1%) and for those who switched from bART to DOR/ISL at Week 48 (0.6%) were similar. The mean percent change in total lymphocyte and CD4 counts were similar for participants who continued on DOR/ISL and switched from bART to DOR/ISL. No participants discontinued treatment due to decreased CD4+ T-cell count or TLC. About Islatravir (MK-8591) and Merck’s HIV Research Islatravir (MK-8591) is Merck’s investigational nucleoside analog that blocks HIV-1 replication by multiple mechanisms including inhibition of reverse transcriptase translocation, resulting in immediate chain termination and induction of structural changes in the viral DNA. Islatravir is under evaluation in multiple ongoing early and late-stage clinical trials in combination with other antiretrovirals for potential daily and once-weekly treatments for HIV-1, with islatravir serving as the anchor medicine in these two-drug regimens. Islatravir in combination with Gilead’s lenacapavir is in Phase 3 development as a novel oral once-weekly treatment for HIV-1 [ISLEND-1 ( NCT06630286 ) and ISLEND-2 ( NCT06630299 )], and islatravir in combination with our company’s investigational non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) ulonivirine (MK-8507) is in Phase 2b development (MK-8591B-060, NCT06891066 and MK-8591B-062, NCT07266831 ) as an oral once-weekly treatment. MK-8527 is the company’s investigational, novel, once-monthly, oral candidate for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV-1. The Phase 3 EXPrESSIVE-11 (MK-8527-011, NCT07044297 ) trial is evaluating the safety and efficacy of MK-8527 as PrEP to reduce the risk of sexually acquired HIV-1 infection among people likely to be exposed to HIV-1 in 16 countries. The Phase 3 EXPrESSIVE-10 (MK-8527-010, NCT07071623 ) trial is evaluating the safety and efficacy of MK-8527 as PrEP to reduce the risk of sexually acquired HIV-1 infection among women and adolescent girls in sub-Saharan Africa. Both trials are now enrolling. For an overview of Merck’s HIV treatment and prevention clinical development program, please click here . Indications and usage for PIFELTRO ® (doravirine) and DELSTRIGO ® (doravirine, lamivudine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) in the U.S. PIFELTRO is indicated in combination with other antiretroviral (ARV) agents for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in adult patients with no prior ARV treatment history or to replace the current ARV regimen in those who are virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL) on a stable ARV regimen with no history of treatment failure and no known substitutions associated with resistance to doravirine. DELSTRIGO is indicated as a complete regimen for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in adult patients with no prior ARV treatment history or to replace the current ARV regimen in those who are virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL) on a stable ARV regimen with no history of treatment failure and no known substitutions associated with resistance to the individual components of DELSTRIGO. Selected Safety Information Warning: Posttreatment Acute Exacerbation of Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) for DELSTRIGO All patients with HIV-1 should be tested for the presence of HBV before initiating ARV therapy. Severe acute exacerbations of HBV have been reported in people with concomitant HIV-1 and HBV who have discontinued products containing lamivudine or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), which are components of DELSTRIGO. Patients coinfected with HIV-1 and HBV who discontinue DELSTRIGO should be monitored with both clinical and laboratory follow-up for at least several months after stopping DELSTRIGO. If appropriate, initiation of anti-HBV therapy may be warranted. Contraindications PIFELTRO and DELSTRIGO are contraindicated when coadministered with drugs that are strong cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A enzyme inducers (including the anticonvulsants carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, phenobarbital, and phenytoin; the androgen receptor inhibitor enzalutamide; the antimycobacterials rifampin and rifapentine; the cytotoxic agent mitotane; and the herbal product St. John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum)), as significant decreases in doravirine plasma concentrations may occur, which may decrease the effectiveness of DELSTRIGO and PIFELTRO. DELSTRIGO is contraindicated in patients with a previous hypersensitivity reaction to lamivudine. Warnings and Precautions Severe Skin Reactions Severe skin reactions, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), have been reported during the postmarketing experience with doravirine-containing regimens. Discontinue PIFELTRO or DELSTRIGO, and other medications known to be associated with severe skin reactions, immediately if a painful rash with mucosal involvement or a progressive severe rash develops. Clinical status should be closely monitored, and appropriate therapy should be initiated. New or Worsening Renal Impairment Renal impairment, including cases of acute renal failure and Fanconi syndrome, have been reported with the use of TDF. DELSTRIGO should be avoided with concurrent or recent use of a nephrotoxic agent (e.g., high-dose or multiple NSAIDs). Cases of acute renal failure after initiation of high-dose or multiple NSAIDs have been reported in people living with HIV with risk factors for renal dysfunction who appeared stable on TDF. Prior to or when initiating DELSTRIGO, and during treatment, assess serum creatinine, estimated creatinine clearance, urine glucose, and urine protein in all patients. In patients with chronic kidney disease, also assess serum phosphorus. Discontinue DELSTRIGO in patients who develop clinically significant decreases in renal function or evidence of Fanconi syndrome. Discontinue DELSTRIGO if estimated creatinine clearance declines below 50 mL/min. Bone Loss and Mineralization Defects In clinical trials in adults living with HIV, TDF was associated with slightly greater decreases in bone mineral density (BMD) and increases in biochemical markers of bone metabolism. Serum parathyroid hormone levels and 1,25 Vitamin D levels were also higher. Cases of osteomalacia associated with proximal renal tubulopathy have been reported with the use of TDF. The effects of TDF-associated changes in BMD and biochemical markers on long-term bone health and future fracture risk in adults are unknown. Immune Reconstitution Syndrome Immune reconstitution syndrome can occur, including the occurrence of autoimmune disorders with variable time to onset, which may necessitate further evaluation and treatment. Drug Interactions Because DELSTRIGO is a complete regimen, coadministration with other antiretroviral medications for the treatment of HIV-1 infection is not recommended. Coadministration of PIFELTRO with efavirenz, etravirine, or nevirapine is not recommended. If DELSTRIGO is coadministered with rifabutin, take one tablet of DELSTRIGO once daily, followed by one tablet of doravirine (PIFELTRO) approximately 12 hours after the dose of DELSTRIGO. If PIFELTRO is coadministered with rifabutin, increase PIFELTRO dosage to one tablet twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart). Consult the full Prescribing Information prior to and during treatment for more information on potential drug-drug interactions. Dosage and Administration/Specific Populations Renal Impairment Because DELSTRIGO is a fixed-dose combination tablet and the dosage of lamivudine and TDF cannot be adjusted, DELSTRIGO is not recommended in patients with estimated creatinine clearance less than 50 mL/min. Adverse Reactions The most common adverse reactions with DELSTRIGO (incidence ≥5%, all intensities) were dizziness (7%), nausea (5%), and abnormal dreams (5%). The most common adverse reactions with PIFELTRO (incidence ≥5%, all intensities) were nausea (7%), dizziness (7%), headache (6%), fatigue (6%), diarrhea (6%), abdominal pain (5%), and abnormal dreams (5%). By week 96 in DRIVE-FORWARD, 2% of adult participants in the PIFELTRO group and 3% in the darunavir+ritonavir (DRV+r) group had adverse events leading to discontinuation of study medication. By week 96 in DRIVE-AHEAD, 3% of adult participants in the DELSTRIGO group and 7% in the efavirenz (EFV)/emtricitabine (FTC)/TDF group had adverse events leading to discontinuation of study medication. In DRIVE-FORWARD, mean changes from baseline at week 48 in LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-HDL-cholesterol (non-HDL-C) were pre-specified. LDL-C: -4.6 mg/dL in the PIFELTRO group vs 9.5 mg/dL in the DRV+r group. Non-HDL-C: -5.4 mg/dL in the PIFELTRO group vs 13.7 mg/dL in the DRV+r group. The clinical benefits of these findings have not been demonstrated. In DRIVE-AHEAD, mean changes from baseline at week 48 in LDL-C and non-HDL-C were pre-specified. LDL-C: -2.1 mg/dL in the DELSTRIGO group vs 8.3 mg/dL in the EFV/FTC/TDF group. Non-HDL-C: -4.1 mg/dL in the DELSTRIGO group vs 12.7 mg/dL in the EFV/FTC/TDF group. The clinical benefits of these findings have not been demonstrated. In DRIVE-SHIFT, mean changes from baseline at week 24 in LDL-C and non-HDL-C were pre-specified. LDL-C: -16.3 mg/dL in the DELSTRIGO group vs -2.6 mg/dL in the PI + ritonavir group. Non-HDL-C: -24.8 mg/dL in the DELSTRIGO group vs -2.1 mg/dL in the PI + ritonavir group. The clinical benefits of these findings have not been demonstrated. In DRIVE-AHEAD, neuropsychiatric adverse events were reported in the three pre-specified categories of sleep disorders and disturbances, dizziness, and altered sensorium. Twelve percent of adult participants in the DELSTRIGO group and 26% in the EFV/FTC/TDF group reported neuropsychiatric adverse events of sleep disorders and disturbances; 9% in the DELSTRIGO group and 37% in the EFV/FTC/TDF group reported dizziness; and 4% in the DELSTRIGO group and 8% in the EFV/FTC/TDF group reported altered sensorium. The safety of DELSTRIGO in virologically suppressed adults was based on week 48 data from participants in the DRIVE-SHIFT trial. Overall, the safety pro virologically suppressed adult participants was similar to that in participants with no ARV treatment history. Serum ALT and AST Elevations: In the DRIVE-SHIFT trial, 22% and 16% of participants in the immediate switch group experienced ALT and AST elevations greater than 1.25 X ULN, respectively, through 48 weeks on DELSTRIGO. For these ALT and AST elevations, no apparent patterns with regard to time to onset relative to switch were observed. One percent of participants had ALT or AST elevations greater than 5 X ULN through 48 weeks on DELSTRIGO. The ALT and AST elevations were generally asymptomatic, and not associated with bilirubin elevations. In comparison, 4% and 4% of participants in the delayed switch group experienced ALT and AST elevations of greater than 1.25 X ULN through 24 weeks on their baseline regimen. Pregnancy/Breastfeeding There is a pregnancy exposure registry that monitors pregnancy outcomes in individuals exposed to PIFELTRO or DELSTRIGO during pregnancy. Healthcare providers are encouraged to register patients by calling the Antiretroviral Pregnancy Registry (APR) at 1-800-258-4263. Inform individuals with HIV-1 infection of the potential risks of breastfeeding, including: (1) HIV-1 transmission (in HIV-1–negative infants), (2) developing viral resistance (in HIV-1–positive infants), and (3) serious adverse reactions in a breastfed infant similar to those seen in adults. Merck’s Commitment to HIV For 40 years, Merck has been committed to scientific research and discovery in HIV leading to scientific breakthroughs that have helped change HIV treatment. Our work has been pioneering in the development of new options across multiple drug classes to help those impacted by HIV. Today, we are developing a series of antiviral options designed to help people manage HIV and protect people from HIV. We are researching for real life and want to ensure people are not defined by HIV. Our work focuses on transformational innovations, collaborations with others in the global HIV community, and access initiatives aimed at the goal of helping to end the HIV epidemic for everyone. About Merck At Merck, known as MSD outside of the United States and Canada, we are unified around our purpose: We use the power of leading-edge science to save and improve lives around the world. For more than 130 years, we have brought hope to humanity through the development of important medicines and vaccines. We aspire to be the premier research-intensive biopharmaceutical company in the world – and today, we are at the forefront of research to deliver innovative health solutions that advance the prevention and treatment of diseases in people and animals. We foster a diverse and inclusive global workforce and operate responsibly every day to enable a safe, sustainable and healthy future for all people and communities. For more information, visit and connect with us on X (formerly Twitter) , Facebook , Instagram , YouTube and LinkedIn . Forward-Looking Statement of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, N.J., USA This news release of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, N.J., USA (the “company”) includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the U. Contacts Media Contacts: Eilyn Segura (203) 940-6259 Deb Wambold (215) 779-2234 Investor Contacts: Peter Dannenbaum (732) 594-1579 Damini Chokshi (732) 594-1577 Read full story here

Gilead is looking to target unmet needs in HIV and present a new, unique treatment option with a single-tablet combination of its bictegravir and lenacapavir. In 2006, Gilead Sciences and Bristol Myers Squibb left a permanent mark on the HIV treatment paradigm by fusing together three antiretrovirals and creating the first once-daily single tablet HIV regimen. Now 20 years later, Gilead is combining two of its powerhouse HIV drugs to create another single-tablet option that the company believes can fill in some treatment gaps by replacing more complex regimens. The investigational combo pill pairs bictegravir, one of the three ingredients in Gilead's leading HIV treatment Biktarvy, with its novel capsid inhibitor lenacapivir. The latter drug was recently launched as a long-acting pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) drug called Yeztugo, but it first hit the market as Sunlenca, a treatment option for those living with multidrug-resistant HIV.  Together in one tablet, currently dubbed BIC/LEN, Gilead figures that the proposed combo could present a new tailored option for those currently taking complex multi-tablet regimens or those looking to switch from other drugs such as Biktarvy. The company painted a picture of the combo’s prowess in different populations of people living with HIV with virologic suppression through its pair of Artistry clinical trials, results from which were presented this week at the 33rd Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI) in Denver. The detailed data build on previously announced top-line results that left Gilead plotting regulatory filings late last year. Gilead’s Artistry trial program was designed to include a broad range of people living with HIV who could benefit from the BIC/LEN combo, the company’s SVP of clinical development and head of virology, Jared Baeten, M.D., Ph.D., told Fierce Pharma in a recent interview. Both studies assessed the percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA levels ≥50 copies/mL, a standard indicator of detectable HIV, as their primary endpoint.Artistry-1 included patients currently managing their HIV with complex multi-tablet regimens due to a variety of factors, such as acquired drug resistance, tolerance issues or drug interactions, to name a few. The phase 2/3 study was conducted across a diverse population of 557 people who were taking between 2 and 11 pills a day at baseline to manage their HIV.  At week 48, BIC/LEN proved noninferior to the complex regimens in maintaining patients' virologic suppression (or low levels of HIV), with 0.8% of participants who switched to the investigational treatment having HIV-1 RNA levels ≥50 copies/mL compared with 1.1% of those who stayed on a complex antiretroviral regimen. To put it another way, 96% of participants had low levels of HIV on the BIC/LEN combo compared to 93.5% who were on complex regimens, according to the study. Switching to the BIC/LEN combo was also linked to an improvement from baseline in fasting lipid levels and, importantly, an increase in patient-reported treatment satisfaction. This was demonstrated by a mean boost of 7 points on the HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ).A 96-week follow-up showed that trial participants who joined the extension period still maintained virologic suppression, researchers found. Detailed Artistry-1 results were also published in The Lancet on Feb. 25.Artistry-1 enrolled patients of various ages and with a range of HIV treatment durations. The median age was 60 years old and the median treatment duration was 28 years.The older population in particular may be especially prone to drug resistance or other intolerance based on decades of experience with early, “less robust therapies of the past,” Baeten explained. “This is a medicine, really, that is addressing some of the challenges of aging with HIV,” Baeten said of BIC/LEN.  The subset of the HIV population covered in the Artistry-1 enrollment criteria represents about 5% of people living with HIV in the U.S., but as Baeten points out, some who are already stable on a single-tablet regimen could also be interested in a different option, meaning the combo could be “beneficial beyond that 5%,” he said.  This is where Artistry-2 comes in. That trial included 574 people with HIV and stacked the combo against Biktarvy, a common standard of care that Gilead notes is recommended in global treatment guidelines. Through week 48, the proposed combo treatment again proved non-inferior to the standard of care Biktarvy in maintaining virologic suppression among those who switched. In this study, 1.3% of those who switched to the BIC/LEN combo had HIV-1 RNA levels ≥50 copies/mL, compared to 1% on solo Biktarvy.Biktarvy’s proven efficacy and safety has long served as an “internal bar” for Gilead when developing new treatments, Baeten said, making the randomized double-blind comparison study of Biktarvy versus BIC/LEN a “high challenge to ourselves.” “With efficacy shown to be comparable to a guideline-recommended therapy, we look forward to the prospect of having another meaningful treatment option for adults with HIV who are virologically suppressed,” trial investigator Eric Meissner, M.D., Ph.D., said in Gilead’s recent release.   Next-generation HIV portfolio  Biktarvy has long been a standout in Gilead's HIV portfolio, but as the med approaches its patent cliff in the next decade, the company is looking to lenacapivir as its next foundational therapy. The novel med forms the bedrock of Gilead’s current HIV pipeline, as the company looks to offer “the right suite of options” for HIV treatment and prevention across medication formulation and dosing timelines, Baeten said. “We are several important steps into this next generation of Gilead‘s HIV portfolio, but we've got a vision that extends well into the next decade,” he added.  The company is planning seven new HIV launches over the next seven years and is studying lenacapivir in various combinations, such as with Merck’s investigational islatravir and with broadly neutralizing antibodies. Gilead doesn’t report specific Sunlenca sales, but Yeztugo generated $150 million in 2025 after its mid-year launch. Upon BIC/LEN's top-line readouts late last year, Citi analyst Geoffrey Meacham, Ph.D., previously wrote that the novel combo “targets a key unmet need within the HIV market” and could allow Gilead to expand its reach in HIV without "cannibalizing its flagship product.” "Overall the positive results across both ARTISTRY (1&2) trials will allow Gilead to provide a simplified 2-drug regimen and provide an alternative for the specific market segments that prefer fewer medications,” Meacham wrote at the time, predicting a 2027 launch and 2030 sales of $630 million.